default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Why forcing us to square dance backfired

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:00 am

“Well, NOW do you like square dancing better than ‘sit-ups’”?

My sadistic physical education teacher had just asked a class of 30 eighth-grade boys if they preferred a scheduled co-ed dance activity to 45 minutes of painful exercises.

Although our bodies were aching, and the smell of week-worn gym clothes permeated the air, the boys replied in unison with a firm, “NO!” Some of the students, including myself, stood in defiance, proclaiming we would fight this unjust torture to the end (well, at least until the end of the class period).

So, what was this big protest all about? It was 1958, and the PE department at North Bethesda Junior High School wanted us to participate in a four-week unit on “square dancing.” That’s right: square dancing!

This might have played well in Independence, Mo. or Stillwater, Okla., but we lived in Bethesda, Md. — a sophisticated suburb of Washington, D.C. We had never seen a square dance, let alone participated in one!

Besides, I was part of the new ‘50s generation. Any social activity from another era was simply “square.” Big bands, Patsy Cline and folk dancing were not part of our acceptable entertainment categories. We were rock ‘n’ roll pioneers. At school dances, we moved to the tunes of Elvis, the Big Bopper and Buddy Holly — not Durango Dave and his Do-Si-Do (pronounced “doe-see-doe”) Dogie Callers.

For those who may not know, square dancing is a folk art that has its origins in 17th century England. In the United States, it is most often associated with country and western pop culture.

The dance involves eight people (four couples) who face off in a square. A “caller” orders various movements from the participants, while a “fiddler” band plays a snappy tune. Some of the standard movements are “promenade” (take your partner from a different location in the square to your original starting point) and “do-si-do” (a move where partners circle each other back-to-back and return to their original positions).

The eighth-grade guys at North Bethesda didn’t want any part of this. First of all, we couldn’t get close to our partners, as we could in slow dancing. How could we be “cool” under these circumstances? Secondly, we couldn’t choose who our partners were. Sometimes, we’d get girls who didn’t want to be with us, and visa versa. The former was pretty humiliating in junior high, where egos are built on eggshells.

Also, we all had given up the cowboy thing by the end of the fourth grade. Now, letterman jackets, saddle shoes and crew cuts were “in.” Plastic Western boots, string ties and midnight-colored fake Stetsons with pictures of Hopalong Cassidy were “out.”

But somewhere in a school curriculum department — in a place far, far away — people knew better. Teachers were ordered to carry out their overseers’ wishes. Kids would be forced to appreciate a form of American folk dancing — whether they liked it or not.

Now it’s true that children don’t always know what’s best for them. But one thing is for certain: Punishment for not liking something is an ineffective way to get people to “appreciate” anything.

Since those days, I haven’t looked at or participated in any square dancing. Not that there is anything wrong with this activity, mind you. As a matter of fact, I’ll bet if those teachers had been more in-touch with the dynamics of how human preferences work, we might have actually liked it.

But unfortunately, I’m sure that a number of former students from North Bethesda have put square dancing in the same category as canned spinach, collard greens and Brussels sprouts.

Somehow, the scholastic goal of culturally diverse appreciation simply got lost in the process.

Steve Hansen is a Lodi writer.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Recent Comments

Posted 8 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Ron Portal’s letters repeat the…

So very much the truth Mr Adams - but you forgot to make the mention of the man who spend the millions and finally discover that the Mr Oba…


Posted 8 hours ago by Michael Fiske.

article: Letter: Suggestions for committee appoi…

Ed, everybody knows JoAnne hates Bob. If you don't know that than you don't know squat! Open your eyes. She campaigned against two candidat…


Posted 8 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Our leaders need to be better r…

The Mr Kindseth wrote that 'America’s attitude toward Royal Emperor Obama changed when he went from “We the People” to “Screw the People”' …


Posted 9 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Steve Hansen: Funding, researcher bias …

Skepticism is a smart way of saying "I DON'T KNOW." No more no less. It is not a lofty intellectual endeavor. It is used by the …


Posted 9 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Ron Portal’s letters repeat the…

A correct assumption instead: Mr. Portal, like most conservatives, utilize information that is not true and when they do use the correct …



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists