Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Steve Hansen Why some documents don’t deserve to be stamped ‘secret’

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Steve Hansen

Posted: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:15 am, Tue Jun 19, 2012.

By now, just about everyone has heard of Bradley Manning, the U.S. Army soldier who was arrested two years ago. He allegedly disseminated classified documents to the website WikiLeaks, thus possibly endangering several U.S. operatives and their allies. His trial is scheduled to begin in the fall.

Recently, a similar issue emerged when unnamed White House officials were accused of leaking classified documents, ranging from a terrorist "hit list" to disclosed cyber attacks against Iran.

This national security concern has two sides. One is the public's right to know based on First Amendment principles. The other is irreparable harm to our country. Some taking the latter position have argued that "arrogant" reporters or self-appointed leakers are not in positions to make such judgments since they seldom have all of the facts of covert operations.

When most people think of "covert operations," they tend to imagine James Bond, along with cloak and dagger intrigue. But that's a very small part. For the vast majority in the "business," work involves gathering and classifying data from all over the world. That usually takes place in a central location, such as the National Security Agency. The activity is not particularly exciting. Actually, it is often mundane and rather boring.

Guarding America's secrets is nothing new. Back in the 1970s, our government had over a billion classified documents. One can only venture a guess as to what that number is today — a figure that also happens to be "classified."

In those days, the job of a data analyst could be somewhat interesting. One confirmed story relayed to me at that time was when an OIC (officer in charge) was asked to update a report on a country that was perceived as being hostile toward the United States.

Doing an adequate job on this meant three choices: Travel to the country by an undercover agent, use informants, or get the information from reliable sources in the States. The brass was not about to authorize an all-expense-paid vacation to a place that only an idealistic movie star could love. There weren't any known local informants. That meant only the third option was left. The agency wasn't much help on this one, either. When the assigned OIC asked for assistance, he was told, "That's your job to figure out where to get information!"

At that point, the OIC and his crew headed for a university library. The "reliable source" turned out to be the New York Times. It was amazing how much information was available on a rather secretive and isolated country. His classified written report was based primarily on what was available from this newspaper.

The work was completed and handed to the supervisor, who promptly stamped each page twice with the word "SECRET." "Sir," inquired the report's author, "I know this is a dumb question, but why is this paper 'secret' when the information came from the New York Times?"

"It's like this," the supervisor replied. "One article from the New York Times is no big deal. But several, arranged in this configuration? Well, that's another story."

For years, I thought this approach to classified documents was rather ridiculous and wondered how many other secret reports were out there based on the New York Times. But one day, I was in Barnes and Noble and tried to find out information on another project. I was amazed at how one source could lead to another and presto, like a jigsaw puzzle, a picture of a former state secret began to take shape.

So after all these years, the debate continues: How much should the public know? Has our government become obsessed with secrecy?

There is a positive side to this controversy for those who may be concerned about sinister evil plots emanating from the darkest corners of the intelligence community. If it were so, I'm sure there would be at least one person, from somewhere in the government, who would be more than happy to place all he knows on a weird and wacky website, or give that information to an aggressive reporter, who considers this type of revelation a "patriotic" venture.

Steve Hansen is a Lodi writer.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Recent Comments

Posted 46 minutes ago by kathy grant.

article: Cleaning Lodi Lake by kayak

Thank you, Sara and Bea, for your very fresh story and pictures of the Lodi Lake Cleanup. You really captured the energy of the day. Ver…

More...

Posted 7 hours ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: Evil is always present

Is it possible, I wonder, that Ms Aquino has confused ISIS with some sort of ethnic group? To be clear Ms Aquino, ISIS is a military org…

More...

Posted 7 hours ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: Evil is always present

Very well put.

More...

Posted 21 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Evil is always present

"a group subhuman and evil like weve never imagined" Miss Aquino - have you never seen picture or read account of the German Na…

More...

Posted 2 days ago by Ed Walters.

article: Letter: It doesn't feel safe in Lodi an…

Ragusa: No matter where you go, being aware of your surroundings always helps. My wife and I went to dinner at the Beer Factory last nig…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Featured Events

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists