default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Was using ‘handicapped’ insensitive?

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Friday, July 23, 2004 10:00 pm | Updated: 10:42 am, Tue Jun 26, 2012.

Were we callous in using the term "handicapped parking?" Jon Withers of Lodi thinks so. Jon fired off a letter to the editor, published this week, chastising us for using the term in a story about a crackdown by Lodi police.

Handicap may still be OK in golf, Jon contends, but it is no longer acceptable in referring to someone who is physically impaired.

"Disabled" is the proper term now, he said.

Richard Hanner

Jon raises a fair point. His letter reflects how usage can evolve to reflect new or deepened sensitivities. Quite frankly, it also shows how usage may not evolve as quickly as some would prefer, because handicapped is a term that continues to be used despite the rancor of its critics.

In the '60s and even '70s, I can recall the word "invalid" used to describe people, mainly older, who suffered from a variety of impairments. I also recall the word "cripple" being used from time to time, though even in that era it was in disfavor.

Today those words are clearly off-limits.

First, they were replaced with handicapped. But with the passage of the Americans With Disabilities Act in 1990, disabled gained increasing popularity. Why the switch from handicapped to disability occurred is not entirely clear.

According to some references, leaders of the disability rights movement in the 1980s insisted handicapped was put into use by special-education authorities, instead of the movement itself.

The Associated Press Stylebook, considered the top reference for newspaper usage, suggests that journalists avoid the word handicap altogether. It says disabled is preferred. Yet it urges that even disabled be used sparingly to describe "a condition that interferes with an individual's ability to do something independently."

Advocates for the disabled suggest that the emphasis be on the individual and on a specific condition, not a generalized description. So "a person with cerebral palsy," is considered preferable to either a disabled or handicapped person.

"We should put the person first," said David Miller, chief executive officer of the Goodwill of the San Joaquin Valley, whom I consulted for this column. He said the word "challenged" is gaining more use, as in "he is physically challenged," for a person who has had polio.

In fact, among some advocates, "challenged" is now preferred over both handicapped and disabled. Other terms are also bring tested, as well, such as "handicapable" or even "inconvenienced."

Like it or not, handicapped is still in common use today. A Google search of "handicapped parking," for instance, brought 600,000 hits. A search of "disabled parking," found more than 1.2 million.

This week a friend dropped off a copy of the Las Vegas Review-Journal. Scanning it, I noticed this headline: "Handicapped access on the buses."

The News-Sentinel story Jon referred to told of efforts by the Lodi police to enforce disabled parking restrictions. Our headline was "Crackdown in Lodi on handicapped parking." The text of the story, too, referred repeatedly to handicapped parking. (I edited the story myself and did not cull out the handicapped references.)

In fact, the notice of deficiency used by Lodi police includes different phrases, including:

"Parking stalls for disabled persons."

"Handicapped stall."

"Handicap accessibility."

(I wasn't able to connect with the police supervisor in charge of the crackdown this week to ask about the language of the notices.)

From my limited research, I gather the preferred term is now "accessible parking," though that strikes me as downright confusing. Aren't parking spaces, by their very nature, accessible?

Over the years, some terms thought to be offensive have pretty much vanished from the usage screen.

Why does handicapped stubbornly persist?

Surprisingly, dictionary definitions seem to support handicapped over disabled.

Frank Smart of Lodi, for one, prefers handicapped. He made his case in a letter to the editor in response to Jon's, which I am including here in edited form because of its relevance:

(Jon's letter) got me thinking as to why someone would get so upset about being referred to as handicapped … when we examine the meanings of the words handicapped and disabled, maybe political correctness has gotten this one wrong. Let's see, handicapped means someone has something that prevents full function in some way, but in all other ways is functional and useful. Not bad. However, if someone or something is disabled, they're not functional at all. If your car is disabled, you can't drive it. If your computer is disabled, no e-mail or Internet. So it seems to me the more compassionate term for a person who is blind, paralyzed, etc., would be handicapped. I would rather be partly functional than disabled. Just a thought from a member of the great unwashed mass.

As the tides of usage shift, we in the newsroom need to be sensitive but also pragmatic.

I can't see adopting "accessible parking," for instance, nor do I see much of a future for the gimmicky "handicapable."

And the logic of Frank Smart's argument regarding handicapped is clear.

On balance, though, for the sake of both consistency and sensitivity, it makes sense for us to follow the counsel of both Jon and the Associated Press and use disabled - at least for the near future.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Recent Comments

Posted 3 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Ron Portal’s letters repeat the…

So very much the truth Mr Adams - but you forgot to make the mention of the man who spend the millions and finally discover that the Mr Oba…


Posted 3 hours ago by Michael Fiske.

article: Letter: Suggestions for committee appoi…

Ed, everybody knows JoAnne hates Bob. If you don't know that than you don't know squat! Open your eyes. She campaigned against two candidat…


Posted 3 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Our leaders need to be better r…

The Mr Kindseth wrote that 'America’s attitude toward Royal Emperor Obama changed when he went from “We the People” to “Screw the People”' …


Posted 4 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Steve Hansen: Funding, researcher bias …

Skepticism is a smart way of saying "I DON'T KNOW." No more no less. It is not a lofty intellectual endeavor. It is used by the …


Posted 4 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Ron Portal’s letters repeat the…

A correct assumption instead: Mr. Portal, like most conservatives, utilize information that is not true and when they do use the correct …



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists