default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Welcome to our Web site revolution

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Friday, January 27, 2006 10:00 pm | Updated: 10:51 am, Tue Jun 26, 2012.

Lodinews.com, the Web site of the Lodi News-Sentinel, entered a new era earlier this month with two new services: We began accepting unedited reader comments at the end of local stories posted online and established an online discussion board, Lodinews.Conversations.

Although certainly not unique among online newspapers, these ventures are a significant step in the development of our Web site. In fact, News-Sentinel Publisher Marty Weybret called the changes a "revolution" at a staff meeting to discuss the efforts.

Revolution may be an apt description. Revolutions are, by nature, fraught with risks and uncertainty - but may also offer great rewards.

Richard Hanner

Readers are at the center of these changes, and we urgently want your feedback. More on that in a moment.

Right now, we're continuing to observe the new services. We're debating such things as how extensive our involvement needs to be in moderating the services and what standards, if any, we want to impose on the story comments and Lodinews.Conversations.

At this point, we're delighted with the number of responses to our stories. But we are also worried about the tone and content of some of the comments, especially ones posted to the stories about the tragic deaths of the two teenage girls in Lockeford on Christmas Eve.

Yet many of the comments on those stories were thoughtful and actually led us to do a follow-up story about the policies and laws the California Highway Patrol must follow when testing drivers for blood alcohol levels.

Some readers have accused us of exploiting a personal tragedy. We feel the comments have been useful in raising awareness of an important social issue: teenage drinking.

While we're pleased with the response to story comments, we're disappointed more people aren't using the Lodinews.Conversations discussion board.

Unlike story comments, there is no word limit on Lodinews.Conversations, which we hope will develop into an online destination for thoughtful debate, rather than the quick, off-the-cuff story comments.

Lodinews.Conversations also has open forums, so your comments don't have to be associated with a particular story.

How to comment

Story comments can be entered at the bottom of every local story posted online. Simply type in a user name, your comment and click the "Post Comment" button.

The Lodinews.Conversations discussion board is available at http://www.lodinews.com/shared-content/phpbb/

Registration is required, but is fast and easy.

Private suggestions or comments may be e-mailed to Editor Richard Hanner at richardh@lodinews.com.

And unlike story comments, Lodinews.Conversations submissions will remain freely available indefinitely, while stories and their associated comments get placed in our paid-access archives after one week.

Lodinews.Conversations also requires users to register with a user name, password, e-mail address and short verification code that is supplied by the software during the registration process. Despite those requirements, you can still remain anonymous if you wish.

Quite frankly, the anonymity we currently allow in both the story comments and on Lodinews.Conversations makes us queasy. It goes against our long-established precedent of requiring full and verifiable identification from people writing letters to the editor, the "old" way of having your comments published.

But such anonymity is common on the Internet, and we wonder if requiring posters to identify themselves might stifle debate. In fact, we suspect that may be one reason why the Lodinews.Conversations discussion board has not taken off as fast as the story comments, even though registration is fast and easy, and users can remain anonymous.

Putting readers directly in touch with others through story comments and discussion boards are opportunities without precedent in the newspaper business. But they are opportunities we felt we needed to embrace if we are to continue our historical role as the voice of the community, and the place where the community can have its voices heard.

Our responsibility now is to use these opportunities to stir debates and conversations about the issues we all care about, to use this closer contact with readers to develop more and better stories. Please take time to visit our Web site, contribute your thoughts, and tell us what you think of all this. You're welcome to post comments at the end of this column, of course. But we've also set up a forum on Lodinews.Conversations where we hope you'll take the time to post ideas about policies we might develop in relation to story comments or the discussion board.

Welcome to the revolution.

Richard Hanner is the Lodi News-Sentinel's editor. He can be contacted at (209) 369-7035 or by e-mail at richardh@lodinews.com.

News-Sentinel Internet Services Manager Simon Birch contributed to this column.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Recent Comments

Posted 1 hour ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Ron Portal’s letters repeat the…

So very much the truth Mr Adams - but you forgot to make the mention of the man who spend the millions and finally discover that the Mr Oba…


Posted 1 hour ago by Michael Fiske.

article: Letter: Suggestions for committee appoi…

Ed, everybody knows JoAnne hates Bob. If you don't know that than you don't know squat! Open your eyes. She campaigned against two candidat…


Posted 1 hour ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Our leaders need to be better r…

The Mr Kindseth wrote that 'America’s attitude toward Royal Emperor Obama changed when he went from “We the People” to “Screw the People”' …


Posted 3 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Steve Hansen: Funding, researcher bias …

Skepticism is a smart way of saying "I DON'T KNOW." No more no less. It is not a lofty intellectual endeavor. It is used by the …


Posted 3 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Ron Portal’s letters repeat the…

A correct assumption instead: Mr. Portal, like most conservatives, utilize information that is not true and when they do use the correct …



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists