default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Rob Reiner's preschool measure ready to collapse

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Friday, April 14, 2006 10:00 pm

Rob Reiner's Proposition 82, the "Preschool for All" initiative that will appear on California's June 6 ballot, is teetering on the brink of collapse.

What's bringing it down is a combination of two things. First, Prop. 82 is the ill-conceived brainchild of a group of Hollywood personalities who - let's face it - don't have a clue about educational realities.

And second, Reiner's First 5 California Families and Children Commission will be the subject of a full-scale state audit for possible misuse of public funds. Reiner, while denying any wrongdoing, has taken a leave of absence from the commission.

Whether Prop. 82 fails because of financial improprieties or because of its own intrinsic shortcomings doesn't matter. The important thing is that Californians realize its folly and chose instead to focus on other, more useful academic goals.

On paper the concept is, of course, appealing. Under Prop. 82, free preschool would be available to any four-year-old who wished to enroll.

And the claims coming out of the Reiner camp are that preschool translates into 13,800 fewer students who repeat grades in primary education, 9,000 fewer kids in special education, and 10,000 more high school graduates.

By adulthood, Prop. 82 proponents insist that those who had preschool instruction are less likely to be dependent on public assistance or to be incarcerated.

And since funding would come from $2.4 billion in taxes imposed upon Californians who earn more than $400,000, Prop. 82 is advertised as a low-cost benefit to the average worker.

So far, so good. But a closer examination made by the non-partisan Rand Corporation found that 66 percent of all California preschool-age children already attend preschool. Prop. 82 would only increase the total to 70 percent. In other words, Prop. 82 would cost $2.4 billion to attain a net increase of 4 percent, or 22,000 students, in preschool enrollment.

According to the Legislative Analyst, the cost of preschool education would be $8,000 per student, per year for a part-time, three-hour per day program.

For the same $2.4 billion, California - badly stretched for educational capital - could hire 69,000 teachers, build or modernize nearly 17,000 new classrooms, or purchase 1.2 million new computers.

In addition to the questionable use of funds, Prop. 82 also raises concerns about creating another layer of a Sacramento bureaucracy that is already a dismal failure.

Under Prop. 82, the state superintendent, Jack O'Connell, would be responsible for establishing the money counties would receive per eligible pupil. Then, those counties can divide their money however they please, but subject to O'Connell's approval.

An interesting side bar, reported by Capitol Weekly News, is that O'Connell campaigned with Reiner in support of Prop 82. In turn, O'Connell was the only statewide candidate to receive financial support - to the tune of $1,500 - from Reiner last year during his re-election effort.

Rather than construct a brand-new administrative and financial monster, as Prop. 82 would certainly do, why not work within the existing system by making kindergarten mandatory?

Look at the California State Board of Education Content Standards for kindergarten, and ask yourself why this grade level is voluntary.

Here are a few of the things expected of children who complete kindergarten:

• In reading, children must be able to distinguish letters from words; read one-syllable, high-frequency sight words; and describe common objects and events in general and specific language.

• In writing, create brief legible sentences using upper- and lower-case letters.

• In math, compare length, width and capacity of objects; identify and describe common geometric objects; and compare familiar plane and solid objects by common attributes.

If I were a parent or activist concerned about California school children's level of academic preparation, I would insist that they attend kindergarten, where the structure for learning is already in place.

And I would forget about more costly and unproven initiatives like Prop 82.

Joe Guzzardi, an instructor at the Lodi Adult School, has been writing a weekly column since 1988. He can be reached by e-mail at joaquin@lodinet.com.

First published: Saturday, April 15, 2006

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Recent Comments

Posted 3 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Ron Portal’s letters repeat the…

So very much the truth Mr Adams - but you forgot to make the mention of the man who spend the millions and finally discover that the Mr Oba…


Posted 3 hours ago by Michael Fiske.

article: Letter: Suggestions for committee appoi…

Ed, everybody knows JoAnne hates Bob. If you don't know that than you don't know squat! Open your eyes. She campaigned against two candidat…


Posted 3 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Our leaders need to be better r…

The Mr Kindseth wrote that 'America’s attitude toward Royal Emperor Obama changed when he went from “We the People” to “Screw the People”' …


Posted 4 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Steve Hansen: Funding, researcher bias …

Skepticism is a smart way of saying "I DON'T KNOW." No more no less. It is not a lofty intellectual endeavor. It is used by the …


Posted 4 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Ron Portal’s letters repeat the…

A correct assumption instead: Mr. Portal, like most conservatives, utilize information that is not true and when they do use the correct …



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists