Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Joe Guzzardi DREAM Act is a nightmare for California’s taxpayers

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Joe Guzzardi

Posted: Saturday, December 31, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 12:49 pm, Mon Jan 9, 2012.

California Assemblyman Tim Donnelly's signature gathering effort to put the DREAM Act, A.B. 131, on the November 2012 ballot is entering its final days. Undecided citizens could learn valuable lessons from Rhode Island.

In September, Rhode Island became the thirteenth state to allow illegal immigrants to pay lower in-state tuition rates. The measure is scheduled to take effect during the autumn 2012 semester. During weeks of testimony before the Rhode Island Board of Education, supporters insisted that the advanced education that the illegal immigrants would receive will help them get high paying jobs.

But during the same testimony, several students inadvertently exposed the folly behind state-based DREAM Acts. College students told of the multiple and insurmountable obstacles they face in getting a job since hiring aliens is illegal. Like A.B. 131, the Rhode Island law does not provide students with United States citizenship which is a federal government function.

One student told the board that he knew of magna cum laude graduates who worked at restaurants for minimum wage. Another called the Rhode Island bill a "dead end."

That's exactly the point. If the Rhode Island DREAM Act, as well the similar California, Texas, Connecticut, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Texas, Utah, Washington and Wisconsin laws don't provide a path to citizenship, they also don't lead to jobs.

The California DREAM Act is flawed in numerous ways. Not only will illegal immigrant students be able to apply for taxpayer funded financial aid at California's public colleges and universities, they will also be eligible to receive Cal Grants which pay up to several thousand dollars annually per student.

Then, there's the cost beleaguered and broke Californians will have to incur. When Governor Jerry Brown signed the bill in October, he projected that the DREAM Act's cost would not exceed $10 million annually. But a December report released by the non-partisan California Legislative Analyst's Office put the annual sum at $65 million, more than six times Brown's original projection.

Broken down, the LAO reported that the California Student Aid Commission (CSAC) will incur estimated "up-front costs of about $700,000 and ongoing annual costs of about $250,000 to administer the DREAM Act." The California Community Colleges (CCC) Chancellor's office says its cost of administering the program will be near $15 million. And the CSAC estimates that the Cal Grant entitlement program will incur annual additional costs of approximately $13 million in the first year and will total around $50 million by 2016-17.

In summary, A.B. 131 would not lead to jobs but instead does raise taxpayer costs and puts citizen children at risk. Each incoming freshman class has a fixed number of seats. When illegal immigrants compete for them, fewer citizens will be accepted.

If Assemblyman Donnelly's effort fails, the DREAM Act would go into effect in 2013 and would represent another roadblock for American youth trying to carve out productive lives.

Joe Guzzardi retired from the Lodi Unified School District in 2008. Contact him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

4 comments:

  • Account Deleted posted at 5:13 pm on Mon, Jan 2, 2012.

    Jesse Hallum Posts: 57

    Be happy you don't live here anymore, Joe. We can't wait to leave California. This is just one more nail in this state's coffin and just another tax burden for honest, hard-working citizens. Between this and that boondogle train project that everyone thought was such a great idea, we have not only hit financial rock-bottom in this state --we have begun to DIG.

    We're tired of recall petition after recall petition, and we're tired of being taxed to death for stupid pet projects that only serve unions and government. And we're sick of the socialist mentality that stinks this place up. We're saving our nickles and the minute certain obligations are finished, we're gone.

     
  • Patrick W Maple posted at 1:40 pm on Mon, Jan 2, 2012.

    Pat Maple Posts: 1804

    Sorry: Forgot to capitalize and give the proper nomenclature and origin: Sexual Act AB/SB/JB 000...it does include everyone.

     
  • Patrick W Maple posted at 1:37 pm on Mon, Jan 2, 2012.

    Pat Maple Posts: 1804

    Joe: Why didn't you term it what it is...a sexual act.

     
  • Don Honda posted at 10:08 am on Sat, Dec 31, 2011.

    DonHonda Posts: 5

    AB 131, CA DREAM Act, You can now download a recall petition onto 8.5 x 14" legal paper, in color and on both sides only, at:

    StopAB131.com Do it now!

    Deadline is January 5, 2012.

    Here’s how AB 131 does not help anyone:
    http://www.600words.com/2011/10/ca-dream-act-misleads-all-including-its-beneficiaries.html

     

Recent Comments

Posted 14 hours ago by jeffreyrinek.

article: San Joaquin County supervisors approve …

Mr. Chang, from your latest comment concerning out of county comments I presume you are referring to me, at the least. Thank you for partic…

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Frank Gayaldo.

article: San Joaquin County supervisors approve …

My passion is promoting our local economy. When the sheriff does things like waste $9 million dollars on jail design plans, that has a dire…

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Eric Barrow.

article: Letter: Pastor Frank Nolton forgets abo…

Left wing political propaganda nonsense? I thought you weren't caught up in the left right paradigm.

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by nth degree wise.

article: Letter: Pastor Frank Nolton forgets abo…

Now who is promoting political (right wing) propaganda nonsense? That a sign on a school building (Gun-Free School Zone) is the cause of sc…

More...

Posted 16 hours ago by Ron Werner.

article: Chris Piombo: Life can be hard for a Do…

The Dodgers, just like the federal government. They think that if you throw enough money at something you can buy what you want. With the …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 37

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists