default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Joe Guzzardi Beseiged and bewildered, Obama’s administration continues to founder

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Joe Guzzardi

Posted: Saturday, September 24, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 3:49 pm, Sat Sep 24, 2011.

On April 9, the News-Sentinel published my column titled "Even with $1 billion war chest, President Obama could be in trouble against Republican rival." Written in response to Obama's announcement earlier that week that he would seek re-election in 2012, I strongly urged him to reconsider.

Among the reasons I pointed to was that Obama has nowhere to go but down. He had been overwhelmingly elected on a wave of public adoration, won the Nobel Prize, hosted White House state dinners and travelled the globe on Air Force One.

What's ahead for Obama in a second term will be an angrier nation and a more divided Congress that would leave his presidency in turmoil. Why should Obama sign up for that?

Obama's best and only move is to retire gracefully, make millions from his autobiography and give speeches. The money would pour in. Obama could live in luxury from his book and public appearances' income which would be supplemented by the generous federal benefits afforded to former presidents.

As I wrote my column, I googled around to see if any other critics shared my views. I wasn't surprised to find that none did. What may have seemed radical in April is now conventional wisdom. Even Obama's hometown newspaper, the Chicago Tribune, has editorialized that he should pull out. In his column "Why Obama Should Withdraw," Steve Chapman theorized that the two recent special House of Representatives' elections, both won by Republicans, spelled disaster. Republicans captured a New York district that had been Democratic for 88 years.

Maureen Dowd, opinion writer for the ultra-liberal, Obama-adoring (until recently) New York Times summarized that the White House team is "flailing — reacting, regrouping, retrenching. It's repugnant."

A neutral source, perennial Green Party candidate Ralph Nader, summarized the Democrats "prescription for defeat" as an incumbent president slipping in the polls, being constantly on the defensive, perceived by his few supporters as wishy-washy and running an unpopular, uninspiring campaign. Nadar listed the Wall Street bailouts, "a unilateral war in Libya," extended, unnecessary, costly war in Afghanistan and the lost the debt-ceiling debate to Republicans as ample justification to dump Obama.

The irony is that the pressure on the most liberal president in history to step aside comes from the Democratic Party's extreme left wing. In what has to be Obama's most bitter pill, a recent poll found that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is America's most popular politician and that many want her to mount a primary challenge against Obama. The pro-Clinton faction hasn't forgotten that a constant theme in her 2008 campaign was that Obama didn't have the necessary experience to be president. In retrospect, Clinton looks prescient.

Clinton insists that this is her last year in public life. But that's what all politicians say until they enter the race. Few question that Clinton would beat Obama. Leading Democrats fear that with Obama on the top of the ticket, the party will lose not only the White House but also both Congressional chambers.

Given Obama's ego, I can't envision him dropping out. But if he does, you can say you got your first inkling of it by reading the News-Sentinel.

Joe Guzzardi is a registered Independent, unlikely to vote for either of the two major party candidates. Contact him at

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 6:02 am on Fri, Sep 30, 2011.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    frown? interesting choice of words... maybe his star struck supporters would simply
    be frowning by now, but people hurt by his actions are doing a bit more that that.

    As far as congress... media hype. No one can vote congress in or out...the presidency is different. I expect even more congressional conservatives to be elected after the dust settles. If Steve's point had any merit, the conservatives would diminish in numbers. We will see next year.

  • Steve Schmidt posted at 1:20 pm on Wed, Sep 28, 2011.

    Steve Schmidt Posts: 2686

    People may frown on Obama but, if public approval ratings are anything to go by, they hate the Republicans in Congress more.

  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:52 am on Tue, Sep 27, 2011.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2866

    Google millionaire tells Obama to raise his taxes.

  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:45 am on Tue, Sep 27, 2011.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2866

    Jerome wrote:

    But equally guilty are those in the media who completely failed in their jobs I suppose because of those peculiar thrills running up their collective legs.


    And I doubt Chris Matthews shares the same sentiments with the Ex Google
    head when he asked Obama to raise his taxes. That thrill he once had up his leg
    has most likely turned into a lurch backwards now that he realizes Obama finds pleasure digging deep into his pockets.

  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 9:42 am on Sat, Sep 24, 2011.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2370

    Mr. Guzzardi wrote regarding Hillary Clinton: “The pro-Clinton faction hasn't forgotten that a constant theme in her 2008 campaign was that Obama didn't have the necessary experience to be president. In retrospect, Clinton looks ‘prescient.’”

    This “theme” wasn’t wholly Ms. Clinton’s – in fact I would attach that label to most everyone who opposed Barack Obama’s irregular rise in American politics. Of course there were plenty of other factors that had him win that election, not the least of which was a pathetic undertaking by John McCain. But equally guilty are those in the media who completely failed in their jobs I suppose because of those peculiar thrills running up their collective legs.

    So here we are about to embark upon another campaign for the presidency. The nation couldn’t be more depressed. Now that Obama has been properly vetted by his own record, let’s hope and pray that the outcome will be different this time around.


Recent Comments

Posted 1 hour ago by Shane Marcus.

article: Letter: The drought is punishment

Greg Myers, There are some truthful things in your comment. However, God isn't punishing anyone for certain sins. Homosexual marriage, (e…


Posted 2 hours ago by Shane Marcus.

article: HIREvent job fair in Stockton on Tuesday

O my, let me just rush over there


Posted 2 hours ago by Shane Marcus.

article: 133-year-old safe delivered to family o…

Keep trying you never know, it may just open one day


Posted 5 hours ago by Steve Schmidt.

Posted 11 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Large class sizes are good for …

Are you really serious, Mr Arthur? When was the last time you were ever in a classroom? [huh]



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists