Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

We could stop this $4 billion taxpayer rip-off — but won’t

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, June 2, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 7:51 am, Wed Jun 6, 2012.

Three weeks ago, an Indiana accountant turned whistle blower exposed the decade-old practice among some illegal immigrant of fraudulently collecting cash refunds for child tax credits. Local network station WTHR broadcast the story that sparked an Internet frenzy creating outrage among citizens.

According to the accountant, thousands of immigrants file false returns claiming, in addition to their own children, neighbors, nieces and nephews. In some cases, even though some of the children may not be their own or even live in the United States, filers receive $1,000 per child. Said the accountant, “It’s so easy it’s ridiculous.”

Crucial to the rip-offs are Individual Tax Identification Numbers, which the Internal Revenue Service issues to workers who pay taxes regardless of their immigration status. Once the immigrants file using their ITINs, the check is in the mail.

Russell George, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, has been hounding Congress for years to close the loophole, something that would be a simple matter of re-writing the tax code and making it mandatory that filers use a valid Social Security number.

Pursuant to an IG report, 72 percent of tax returns filed by ITIN users claimed the ATCT credit compared to just 14 percent of returns filed with Social Security numbers. The bottom-line cost to American taxpayers is $4.2 billion annually.

Since its original broadcast, WTHR heard back from several frustrated former and current IRS employees who described the agency’s pressure-packed policy to process as many ITIN applications as possible even though the applications are obviously fraudulent.

One INS employee said that during a recent day, he saw the same ITIN documentation including the identical photographs and signatures “dozens of times.” According to one disgruntled worker, even though the ITIN’s supporting paperwork is clearly fake, the employees are forced to process “X amount in an hour, or you don’t get your pay grade raise or that great evaluation. You have to kick them out as quickly as possible if you want to keep your job.”

In short, this level of blatant deceit by citizens would result in fines, penalties or possible jail time.

Of the multiple problems Congress faces, correcting the ITIN scandal would be the easiest to resolve — by following Inspector General George’s recommendation to change the tax code to require valid Social Security numbers on returns.

The House, at least, has taken the first step. Rep. Sam Johnson (R-Texas) introduced a provision that would prevent illegal immigrants from collecting the additional tax child credit. Johnson’s proposal was added to a budget reconciliation bill (H.R. 5652) that the House passed.

However, the Democratic-controlled Senate is unlikely to support the House. Last week, Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) introduced S. 577 that duplicates Johnson’s language. But Majority Leader Harry Reid blocked Sen. Jeff Sessions and Vitter’s proposal to ask for unanimous consent on S. 577.

Sessions blasted Reid, the IRS and President Obama for their collective refusal to act in Americans’ best interests. Sessions, noting that the $4 billion annual cost would eliminate the remaining shortfall for the federal highway bill and cover much of the student loan bill’s costs, said: “This should not be a partisan issue: It is wrong for the government to use Americans’ tax dollars to directly subsidize illegality, especially at a time when our nation is spending so much money we don’t have.”

As Sessions noted, the ITIN flim-flam is simply flat-out wrong. The congressionally sanctioned sting is a deeply insulting affront to honest, hard-working Americans.

Joe Guzzardi retired from the Lodi Unified School District in 2008. Contact him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Joanne Bobin posted at 11:53 am on Sun, Jun 3, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4306

    Interesting that what Joe Guzzardi does not point out in this column is that this issue has been exacerbated by unscrupulous tax preparers, i.e. one of which was "the whistle blower" who was obviously involved in this scheme, and lazy IRS employees and/or the IRS procedure for processing these returns.

    According to the IRS code for the "Additional Child Tax Credit," there are limits to the refundable portion of this credit which were apparently either ignored when returns were processed and/or manipulated by tax preparers who submitted the returns on behalf of their "clients."

    No doubt, these tax preparers are well known to the illegal worker community and they most likely received a large "commission" for preparing the returns fraudulently.

    Mr. Guzzardi is wrong to place the entire blame on the "ITIN flim-flam." ITINs serve a legitimate purpose, but this amount of fraud could not possibly have been committed by a "number." Willing human participants, including tax preparers and government employees were complicit.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 14 hours ago by jeffreyrinek.

article: San Joaquin County supervisors approve …

Mr. Chang, from your latest comment concerning out of county comments I presume you are referring to me, at the least. Thank you for partic…

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Frank Gayaldo.

article: San Joaquin County supervisors approve …

My passion is promoting our local economy. When the sheriff does things like waste $9 million dollars on jail design plans, that has a dire…

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Eric Barrow.

article: Letter: Pastor Frank Nolton forgets abo…

Left wing political propaganda nonsense? I thought you weren't caught up in the left right paradigm.

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by nth degree wise.

article: Letter: Pastor Frank Nolton forgets abo…

Now who is promoting political (right wing) propaganda nonsense? That a sign on a school building (Gun-Free School Zone) is the cause of sc…

More...

Posted 16 hours ago by Ron Werner.

article: Chris Piombo: Life can be hard for a Do…

The Dodgers, just like the federal government. They think that if you throw enough money at something you can buy what you want. With the …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 37

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists