Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

We could stop this $4 billion taxpayer rip-off — but won’t

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, June 2, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 7:51 am, Wed Jun 6, 2012.

Three weeks ago, an Indiana accountant turned whistle blower exposed the decade-old practice among some illegal immigrant of fraudulently collecting cash refunds for child tax credits. Local network station WTHR broadcast the story that sparked an Internet frenzy creating outrage among citizens.

According to the accountant, thousands of immigrants file false returns claiming, in addition to their own children, neighbors, nieces and nephews. In some cases, even though some of the children may not be their own or even live in the United States, filers receive $1,000 per child. Said the accountant, “It’s so easy it’s ridiculous.”

Crucial to the rip-offs are Individual Tax Identification Numbers, which the Internal Revenue Service issues to workers who pay taxes regardless of their immigration status. Once the immigrants file using their ITINs, the check is in the mail.

Russell George, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, has been hounding Congress for years to close the loophole, something that would be a simple matter of re-writing the tax code and making it mandatory that filers use a valid Social Security number.

Pursuant to an IG report, 72 percent of tax returns filed by ITIN users claimed the ATCT credit compared to just 14 percent of returns filed with Social Security numbers. The bottom-line cost to American taxpayers is $4.2 billion annually.

Since its original broadcast, WTHR heard back from several frustrated former and current IRS employees who described the agency’s pressure-packed policy to process as many ITIN applications as possible even though the applications are obviously fraudulent.

One INS employee said that during a recent day, he saw the same ITIN documentation including the identical photographs and signatures “dozens of times.” According to one disgruntled worker, even though the ITIN’s supporting paperwork is clearly fake, the employees are forced to process “X amount in an hour, or you don’t get your pay grade raise or that great evaluation. You have to kick them out as quickly as possible if you want to keep your job.”

In short, this level of blatant deceit by citizens would result in fines, penalties or possible jail time.

Of the multiple problems Congress faces, correcting the ITIN scandal would be the easiest to resolve — by following Inspector General George’s recommendation to change the tax code to require valid Social Security numbers on returns.

The House, at least, has taken the first step. Rep. Sam Johnson (R-Texas) introduced a provision that would prevent illegal immigrants from collecting the additional tax child credit. Johnson’s proposal was added to a budget reconciliation bill (H.R. 5652) that the House passed.

However, the Democratic-controlled Senate is unlikely to support the House. Last week, Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) introduced S. 577 that duplicates Johnson’s language. But Majority Leader Harry Reid blocked Sen. Jeff Sessions and Vitter’s proposal to ask for unanimous consent on S. 577.

Sessions blasted Reid, the IRS and President Obama for their collective refusal to act in Americans’ best interests. Sessions, noting that the $4 billion annual cost would eliminate the remaining shortfall for the federal highway bill and cover much of the student loan bill’s costs, said: “This should not be a partisan issue: It is wrong for the government to use Americans’ tax dollars to directly subsidize illegality, especially at a time when our nation is spending so much money we don’t have.”

As Sessions noted, the ITIN flim-flam is simply flat-out wrong. The congressionally sanctioned sting is a deeply insulting affront to honest, hard-working Americans.

Joe Guzzardi retired from the Lodi Unified School District in 2008. Contact him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Joanne Bobin posted at 11:53 am on Sun, Jun 3, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Interesting that what Joe Guzzardi does not point out in this column is that this issue has been exacerbated by unscrupulous tax preparers, i.e. one of which was "the whistle blower" who was obviously involved in this scheme, and lazy IRS employees and/or the IRS procedure for processing these returns.

    According to the IRS code for the "Additional Child Tax Credit," there are limits to the refundable portion of this credit which were apparently either ignored when returns were processed and/or manipulated by tax preparers who submitted the returns on behalf of their "clients."

    No doubt, these tax preparers are well known to the illegal worker community and they most likely received a large "commission" for preparing the returns fraudulently.

    Mr. Guzzardi is wrong to place the entire blame on the "ITIN flim-flam." ITINs serve a legitimate purpose, but this amount of fraud could not possibly have been committed by a "number." Willing human participants, including tax preparers and government employees were complicit.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 9 hours ago by Angie McDaniel.

article: Steve Hansen: Climate change is real, b…

So you admit that Dr. Powell is NOT a relevant expert?

More...

Posted 10 hours ago by Simon Birch.

article: Lodi City Council candidates talk jobs,…

The video of the forum is almost 2 hours long. It took awhile to process. It's now online.

More...

Posted 10 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Vote for a better future for all

This must be most similar to the Sarah Palin who make this claim (and before speak about some of the people are the real American and not o…

More...

Posted 10 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Steve Hansen: Climate change is real, b…

This show interest in juvenile exchanges rather than mature thought.

More...

Posted 11 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Gwin Paden: On learning Welsh, and kind…

This has to be one of the strangest and most ill inform claim I have heard. I think you should go back and do some research Mr Lauchland.

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Featured Events

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists