default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Joe Guzzardi: California needs a realistic strategy to use less water

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Friday, July 11, 2014 10:39 pm

Thirty years have passed since the Academy Award winning movie “Chinatown” revisited California’s infamous Water Wars between Los Angeles and farmers in the state’s eastern Owens Valley. To this day, water and how to use it remains a controversial but critical debate, which the current three-year-long drought has exacerbated.

As Californians enjoy the summer months, how to manage water in face of its increasing scarcity amidst growing population and less rain fall is essential.

According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly, all of California is under at least severe drought conditions, with one-third of the state — including the San Joaquin Valley — listed as exceptionally at risk. The 33 percent in the exceptional category is the highest since 2000, when the Drought Monitor first published its findings. California is also experiencing the hottest year in its history, with temperatures averaging 5 degrees above normal and anticipated to remain above normal for at least the next three months.

Raising awareness of what scientists call our “water footprint” is the first step Californians must take. The water footprint accounts for the total volume of freshwater used to produce the goods and services we consume, and represents the most holistic way Californians can identify and eliminate wasteful water habits.

Californians, like other American consumers, are addicted to water and use, either directly or indirectly, about 2,000 gallons of water daily, twice the global average.

The State Water Resources Control Board anticipates setting tighter, mandatory restrictions on outdoor residential use and levying stiff fines up to $500 for violating the new policy, which they’ll introduce next Tuesday, to will take effect in August. The control board predicts that by banning wasteful lawn watering, car washing and sidewalk spraying, California could save enough water to supply more than 3.5 million people for a year. Local police will be empowered to enforce the regulations.

Previously imposed restrictions resulted in only a 5 percent water usage reduction, far below Gov. Jerry Brown’s hoped for 20 percent.

The Public Policy Institute of California recently analyzed what might realistically be expected from conservation measures. While acknowledging that new technology and changing attitudes toward water uses have already yielded long-term declines in per capita consumption, the prediction which many environmentalists make that urban and farm conservation can create as much as 10 million acre-feet of new water simply aren’t credible, the PPIC determined.

PPIC contends that conservation doesn’t necessarily yield new water, because saved water is already reused, particularly in agriculture. Worldwide studies analyzed by PPIC showed that increased irrigation efficiency isn’t as likely to decrease net water use, but to instead encourage more planting more crops.

The conclusion PPIC reached is that the only way to achieve the level environmentalists aspire to would be to fallow millions of acres of farmland, hardly viable in California.

Nevertheless, since 1990 and despite the addition of millions of new California residents, reductions in urban per capita water usage has remained steady at about 8.5 million acre-feet annually, an encouraging trend, but one that without continued efforts by concerned Californians will not be sustainable.

Joe Guzzardi is a Los Angeles native who grew up when the state’s population was about 10 million, nearly 30 million fewer people than today. Joe retired from the Lodi Adult School in 2008. Contact him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Recent Comments

Posted 6 hours ago by Brian Dockter.

article: Steve Hansen: Driving through the gaunt…

Chuckle, I don't know how many times you have muttered (in so many words) you are on the side of those who are opposed to an armed society…


Posted 6 hours ago by Brian Dockter.

article: Steve Hansen: Driving through the gaunt…

And those of you planning a trip to Phoenix. It's one of the most bicycle unfriendly metro areas. I suggest a rear view mirror on your helm…


Posted 6 hours ago by Brian Dockter.

article: Steve Hansen: Driving through the gaunt…

Steve, I sympathize with you. However, the Phoenix, AZ metro area is the red light running capital of the country from what I hear. The pau…


Posted 6 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Eat at Chili’s to help Raymond …

Why is it that people such as that below who claim to have a belief in God and throw around their religious beliefs are the ones most likel…


Posted 6 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: No one’s faith should be scorned

The hypocrisy here is just amazing. One only has to enter the name of this letter writer into the Lodi paper search and find all of the …



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists