Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Joe Guzzardi: Judge sends high-speed rail plan off the tracks

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, January 4, 2014 12:00 am

Environmentalists and budget critics of California’s proposed bullet train may be breathing a sigh of relief.

Throughout its brief but tumultuous history, the bullet train has suffered a series of setbacks. Until now, none of them have been fatal.

But last month Sacramento Supreme Court Judge Michael Kenny ruled that the High-Speed Rail Authority could not use $8.6 billion in voter approved bonds. Proposition 1A, passed in 2008, required the rail authority to specify the funding sources for the line’s first operable segment and to have all the necessary environmental clearances in place. Kenny ruled that the agency did not comply with either mandate when it approved the start of construction from Madera to Fresno, about 30 miles.

In a separate lawsuit filed by San Joaquin Valley residents, Kenny also ordered the rail authority to rewrite its $68 billion business plan before undertaking future construction because the state identified only funding sources that are “merely theoretically possible.” Although the rail authority promises it will issue bonds, the judge wants to know who will buy them. What were once considered potential buyers are no long realistic candidates — the federal government is in strict sequester mode, California has no readily available excess cash and private investors show little, if any, interest.

The plaintiffs’ attorney, Michael Brady, provided additional comfort to Californians who think the rail is expensive, frivolous and would rarely be used. Brady wondered how long it would take to complete 300 miles of environmental clearances when it took five years to finish 28 miles. The answer: 50 years.

Another formidable hurdle would have to be overcome. Rail agency spokesmen say they have identified 401 separate parcels of prime acreage needed to complete the first leg, but are only in active negotiations with a handful of owners to acquire them. State officials anticipate asking for the power of eminent domain to acquire at least three of the parcels in early 2014.

Advocates have downplayed the bonds’ significant cost factor. The non-partisan California Legislative Analyst’s Office projected an interest rate at 5 percent with a repayment period of 30 years. Using those estimates, the California General Fund’s cost would be approximately $19.4 billion to pay off principal ($9.95 billion) and interest ($9.5 billion) or about $647 million annually. Those calculations, however, don’t include operating costs and maintenance, which the LAO projects at $1 billion per year and may be only partially offset by passenger revenue.

Despite Gov. Jerry Brown’s repeated assurances, Californians remain skeptical about the rail’s feasibility and concerned about the fiscal brunt of failure. One reason that voters have so little confidence is that rail advocates would have to pull off a masterpiece of intricate planning to make the bullet train effective.

There’s a big difference between the drawing board and reality. Theoretically, job growth and other economic benefits logically follow an integrated transportation system. But success would require a well-designed combination of station location, links to other transportation systems and supportive land-use and zoning policies to make rail stations a catalyst for economic stimulus.

The bullet train is the largest capital project in California’s history. If ever completed, the rail would have devastating, irreversible effects on the state’s environment, encourage further unsustainable population growth and, despite its huge cost, have no guarantee of ridership.

Luckily for Californians, it appears permanently derailed.

Joe Guzzardi retired from the Lodi Unified School District in 2008 and lives in Pittsburgh. Contact him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

3 comments:

  • Kevin Paglia posted at 8:25 pm on Mon, Jan 6, 2014.

    Kevin Paglia Posts: 1903

    Anytime the government can force citizens off their rightfully owned property under the guise of "eminent domain", I worry and am resistant to. Especially when that property is the livelihood of that owner.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 8:41 am on Sat, Jan 4, 2014.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2813

    http://www.ushsr.com/


    "88% of Americans support high speed rail"


    "Building a new system of high speed rail in America will be faster, cheaper, and easier than building more freeways or adding to an already over-burdened aviation system - and everybody stands to benefit."
    -President Obama

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 8:36 am on Sat, Jan 4, 2014.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2813

    Joe,

    In twenty years, when the high speed rail still hasn't been built and the reality that it should have been built twenty years ago comes to pass, it will be even more expensive to build it. Frankly, I don't understand why people are into such a self-fullfulling prophecy..

     

Recent Comments

Posted 13 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Letter: Do you pick and choose which le…

Things I didn`t know, Fox being one of the Clinton's largest donors, and both of those two phonies claim they were broke. Rodham`s book …

More...

Posted 14 hours ago by Kevin Paglia.

article: Cyclefest success sparks hope for Tour …

Lodi may be a cycle loving area, but many of the drivers out there aren't. I routinely have cars pull out in front of me, forcing me to sl…

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Dean Tiernan.

article: Lodi City Council seeks solutions to fl…

Dogs have been effective at moving geese along, temporarily. I know of a border collie that was employed in the Alameda area for twice dail…

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by John Kindseth.

article: Letter: Do you pick and choose which le…

Your comments would convey a better tone of accuracy if you had taken a tally of the comments over a 1-2 or 3 week period and included that…

More...

Posted 16 hours ago by Eric Barrow.

article: Letter: Do you pick and choose which le…

Sounds to me like he's seen enough Fox news to know what's up.

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists