Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

U.S. senators should follow the pope’s lead and resign

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, February 16, 2013 12:00 am

Pope Benedict XVI's admirable decision to resign from the papacy may have inspired at least one of our elderly United States senators, New Jersey's Frank Lautenberg. On Thursday, Lautenberg, who is 89, announced that he would not seek re-election in 2014.

Voluntarily stepping down from one of the world's most demanding positions because of declining heath of mind and body is no shame. To quote Joseph Ratzinger, "I have had to recognize my incapacity to adequately fulfill the ministry entrusted to me."

Of the 100 senators, 21 are older than 70. The oldest, Lautenberg, is four years older than Pope Benedict. Lautenberg was recently seen teetering around with a cane. Had Lautenberg run and won — as incumbents almost always do — he would have served until he's 96.

The oldest ever in the Senate was South Carolina's Strom Thurmond, who died in office at age 100.

For months, Lautenberg has struggled with his decision. Reluctantly, according to insiders, he decided to step down to make way for the candidacy of Newark mayor Cory Booker, 43.

According to actuarial tables, a 90-year-old has only a 1 in 6 chance of living to 96. For those who do, the same data indicates that most will suffer from acute mental and physical decline.

What I'm working up to is that, since Congress has no term limits on its members and is not about to pass any, the responsibility for making a candidate's advanced age an issue — and it's a completely valid one — falls to the media. But, perhaps out of fear that readers will perceive direct questioning about longevity as mean-spirited, journalists minimize age regardless of how elderly the candidate is. A recent story about Lautenberg referred to him as "feisty" when the correct word is "crotchety."

California's Dianne Feinstein is second behind Lautenberg in age. In June, she'll turn 80. Despite nearly 45 years in elective office — San Francisco Board of Supervisors, San Francisco mayor and U.S. senator — Feinstein adamantly refused to debate her 49-year-old opponent, Elizabeth Emken, at least in part because she knew she would come off poorly on television compared to her younger challenger.

In 2010, 79-year-old Sen. Arlen Specter hoped to continue his Senate career, which began in 1980. Even though Specter had undergone several cancer operations, he entered the Republican primary but was defeated. Had Specter won, he would have died in office.

Appropriate lines of questioning from journalists to those of advanced age running again in 2014 — like 78-year-olds Carl Levine, D-Mich., and Jim Inhofe, R-Okla. — should include something like, "Do you think you can fully carry out your responsibilities over the next six years?" or "Don't you think someone younger could do a better job?" While direct responses are unlikely, the audience would have a chance to determine how intelligently the candidates reply.

The Senate's 70-plus membership has served an average of 20 years. They've achieved whatever fame or notoriety that accompanies a long congressional career. Their collective wealth is massive.

The average net worth for a senator is nearly $14 million. Lautenberg — $86 million — and Feinstein — $70 million — are the fifth and seventh wealthiest senators.

To those in Congress older than 70, follow Pope Benedict's example. Go home. Take up stamp collecting. Play with your great-grandchildren. You may not believe it, but the nation can get along without you.

Joe Guzzardi retired from the Lodi Unified School District in 2008. He has written frequently about national politics since 1986. Contact him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

8 comments:

  • Mike Adams posted at 11:14 am on Wed, Feb 27, 2013.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1385

    And for 2nd time I can remember, I agree with Jerome Kinderman.

     
  • Patrick W Maple posted at 9:15 pm on Mon, Feb 18, 2013.

    Pat Maple Posts: 1805

    So to...amen brodder!

     
  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 6:10 pm on Mon, Feb 18, 2013.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2353

    Insofar as the Supreme Court is concerned, I can't help but think the Founders really didn't foresee our lives extending so far into our eighties and nineties and beyond. Even if they did, the notion of dementia and Alzheimer's disease hadn't occurred to them.

    It would be nice if our politicians would recognize for themselves the appropriate time to step aside rather than continuing to hang on to their seats or positions simply because they can. Power is something not easily voluntarily given up. As far as elected positions are concerned, the blame there still rests with the People; we've got no one to blame but ourselves.

    Nevertheless, even with the flaws inherent within our system of government it's pretty darn good. I wouldn't trade it for any other in existence today.

     
  • Patrick W Maple posted at 12:15 pm on Mon, Feb 18, 2013.

    Pat Maple Posts: 1805

    I third...with some reservations...mrc...the SCOTUS justices are appointed for life for a reason...it is called political pandering and re-election payoffs...like BO (and most politicians) did for the unions and his pals. No need for that with SCOTUS.

     
  • Bobcatbob Ingram posted at 10:58 am on Sun, Feb 17, 2013.

    99er Posts: 119

    This kind of thinking is the first tiny step to life age limits. Which may or may not be good for America.

     
  • Robert Jacobs posted at 6:19 am on Sun, Feb 17, 2013.

    Robert Jacobs Posts: 298

    Feinstein is a joke. Same as when she was Mayor of San Francisco!

     
  • Andy Crowder posted at 12:14 pm on Sat, Feb 16, 2013.

    Andy Crowder Posts: 245

    70 is the cutoff age for usefulness, is it? I guess you would then favor all of the elderly members of the Supreme Court resign in mass? Time for Antonin Scalia and the others to go play patty cake with their grandchildren?

    You must be nearing that cutoff age yourself, Joe. I hope you like stamp collecting.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 8:11 am on Sat, Feb 16, 2013.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2830

    I second that, Joe.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 17 hours ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: What is happening in this count…

The Founding Father's would be proud of these students for standing up to these small minded would be tyrants. It is a shame there isn't …

More...

Posted 18 hours ago by Eric Barrow.

article: Letter: What is happening in this count…

"Rip the heart and soul out of this once proud nation" How about a little pride in these young people willing to look unabashed a…

More...

Posted 18 hours ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: What is happening in this count…

Imagine how the story of the Boston Tea Party will have to be taught under these restrictions. Irony... Ya gotta love it!

More...

Posted 18 hours ago by Eric Barrow.

article: Letter: What is happening in this count…

How about the just present the facts and let people decide for themselves what part of the American story is positive and what you are prou…

More...

Posted 18 hours ago by Eric Barrow.

article: Steve Hansen: Climate change is real, b…

Slowly but surely the naysers come around some time in the future the Steve Hansen's of the world will be admitting that man did have a han…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

What would you like to see in Lodi's parks?

Lodi's Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department is hosting a public workshop at 7 p.m. at Hutchins Street Square to find out how it can better meet the needs of the community. What would you like to see in Lodi's parks?

Total Votes: 203

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Featured Events

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists