default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Joe Guzzardi Why family planning equals going green

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Joe Guzzardi

Posted: Saturday, April 14, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:56 am, Sat Apr 14, 2012.

Going green is all the rage. "Consider the environment before printing out this email," is one of many cautionary notes office administrators sound to encourage their employees to respect our diminishing resources.

During Earth Day, more than any other, Americans acknowledge the importance of recycling and using alternative public transportation. On college campuses, engaged students spread warnings about the negative long term consequences of excessive consumption.

But preserving our precious space is a challenge that requires full-time attention, especially since popular culture celebrates procreation. Famous celebrities' baby bumps are pictured on tabloids with fawning headlines. Conversely, discussions that stress the importance of limiting children to replacement level or lower are taboo.

Yet, although family planning is considered politically incorrect, nothing is greener. The basic science is beyond dispute: The more children born, the more toxic carbon dioxide emissions are eventually created.

Three years ago, the Optimum Population Trust commissioned the London School of Economics to study childbirth and its long term environmental impact. The report concluded that meeting the unfulfilled birth control needs of women who indicated a desire to limit reproduction would reduce unintended births by 72 percent and cut the projected 2050 world population by half a billion to 8.6 billion. Extending its calculations, the LSE concluded 12 billion fewer "people-years" would be lived and 34 gigatons of CO2 that would otherwise be generated could be saved. In short, condoms and other safe birth control methods represent the maximum green.

One reason so few intelligent debates about overpopulation occur is that the mind can't grasp the staggering numbers at the issue's core, like billions and gigatons. To break population growth into more digestible bites, consider California and the data contained in the 1940 and 2010 U.S Bureau of the Census reports. For natives like me who remember California back when, the findings are stunning.

Comparing the 1940 census to today, a host of negatives appear obvious. Seven decades ago, only six California cities had populations of 100,000 or more: Long Beach, Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento, San Diego and San Francisco. But overpopulation, which is fueled in large part by another unmentionable, over-immigration, has created 67 cities in 2010 with populations greater than 100,000. In 1940, California was the nation's fifth-largest state. As California approaches 40 million people, it's the most populated and the most adversely impacted by sprawl and pollution. According to Forbes Magazine, California has four of the top five dirtiest cities in America, including three in the once pristine San Joaquin Valley: Bakersfield, Modesto and Fresno.

As a result of California's unsustainable population increases, the Golden State, once synonymous with unspoiled beaches, vineyards and the magnificent Sierra Nevada, now has the nation's most densely urbanized areas.

California ranks in the top three nationwide when measured by population density: Los Angeles, San Francisco/Oakland and San Jose. In Los Angeles, an average 7,000 residents live on each square mile — people on top of people. Even tiny Delano with its 54,000 residents ranks fourth, with 5,500 humans per square mile, higher in density than New York/Newark.

Unchecked population growth makes every social challenge harder to resolve. Each time a new person is added to the existing population, the crises facing education, crime, medical care and mass transit have fewer solutions.

There's good news to report, however. After years of conservationists pounding away about limiting population, a key demographic may finally have gotten the message.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of Vital Statistics reported that the teen birthrate declined 9 percent between 2009 and 2010 to 34 births per 1,000 women ages 15 to 19. A CDC spokesman called the drop "phenomenal."

The climb back to population stability is still uphill. But teen awareness is a first, important step to a smaller and greener society.

Joe Guzzardi is a Los Angeles native, born when the city was still considered a small town. Contact him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Recent Comments

Posted 13 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Ron Portal’s letters repeat the…

Joanne Its so good to see your name on these boards again. I miss your insightful commentary. Don't stay away [thumbup]


Posted 13 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Our leaders need to be better r…

Great Letter Eric [thumbup]


Posted 15 hours ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: Our leaders need to be better r…

Obama is a socialist in the same sense that Mitt Romney is a fascist.


Posted 16 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Our leaders need to be better r…

"Conservatives as the culprits in ever human evil that has befallen mankind. THAT is the legacy our political leadership (both Parties…


Posted 16 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Our leaders need to be better r…

So you're part of that 30%? You (and the rest of your percentage) hate him because his father was black and his mother was white. You thi…



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists