default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Joe Guzzardi: Hillary Clinton in 2016? It’s not likely to happen

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Andrew Liebich posted at 10:18 am on Tue, Oct 1, 2013.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2692

    Millions of Democrats will be fooled once again, as they are invariably. Democrats are especially gullible and politically naïve, followed by mindless Fox News watching Republicans.Both repeatedly prove Einstein right – insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

  • Eric Barrow posted at 10:34 am on Mon, Sep 30, 2013.

    Eric Barrow Posts: 1342

    Joe’s delusions are getting worse. I’m sure he would like to think that we are tired of the Clintons but the liberals I talk to are just itching to give Hillary the nomination sorry Joe but your column is just wishful thinking.

  • John Kindseth posted at 7:42 pm on Sun, Sep 29, 2013.

    John Kindseth Posts: 228

    Joe, in addition to all those you mentioned that are over exposed: the bushes, the clinthongs, the Obamas, the Hildebeast, etc, do not forget the most pitiful: Jerry Brown. The man who has singlehandedly brought California cities to their knees.

  • Ted Lauchland posted at 1:28 pm on Sat, Sep 28, 2013.

    Ted Lauchland Posts: 229

    So long as it continues to take money to be seen in this country I can not say that vying for Presidency is going to change much. I can't say I would want a homeless individual as President either. Finding a balance always will come with it's own baggage. Obama in particular came with a boatload. The Bushes did too. Thus the importance of both Houses and the separate states and counties and cities and families and individuals. None of it should be more powerful than the others. Cooperation between them means Obama is no better than I nor should he be regarded as such. He is not indispensable as so am I.

    The Clintons as being overly visible? - Could be. Palin was accused of just the opposite. How about Guzzardi for El Presidente ?

    Money will always seem like it is more powerful only in that it can do more things than no money. It can be a source for good or a source for bad. So are you suggesting that all political campaigns be restricted to only public moneys by law and not allow influences of any other type? - It won't happen in this free country. -No threat strong enough could exist to keep it in line.

    Watching the patterns over the years ,generally speaking, bounce between the Democrat leaderships and the Republican leaderships proves that a balance is forever being sought. However, the average person does not live forever and that political mix is ever changing just in a new crop of voters every year. Influences that also change. The only thing that is constant is the original plan for this country.


Recent Comments

Posted 12 hours ago by Joe Baxter.

article: Letter: Pastor Frank Nolton forgets abo…

Fighting for "civil rights". Who defines civil rights? It is clear the LGBT isn't stopping at "civil rights", they are …


Posted 13 hours ago by Brian Dockter.

article: Letter: Obamacare is not the program pr…

And of course it's not a matter of plagiarizing. It's what's plagiarized. Right, Ms. Bobbin?


Posted 13 hours ago by Brian Dockter.

article: Letter: Obamacare is not the program pr…

Chuckle, Had the letter been plagiarism and thus citing the positive attributes of Obamacare, we wouldn't have heard a peep of criticism f…


Posted 21 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Pastor Frank Nolton forgets abo…

Well said, Mr Heuer. Your line about is it a woman or a man made me think of the song "Turn the Page." That'd be the perfect t…


Posted 22 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: San Joaquin County supervisors approve …

You are a good man, Walter.... Quack on, baby!! [beam]



Popular Stories


Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 99


Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists