Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Tax hikes shouldn’t have passed without cuts to wasteful spending

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, January 5, 2013 12:00 am | Updated: 7:02 am, Sat Jan 5, 2013.

The new year began with good news and bad news, both pertaining to the same subject.

America didn't fall of the fiscal cliff — the good news. The story will no longer capture the headlines and top spot on radio and television broadcasts, more good news for those who believe that too much coverage of a single event eventually dilutes its impact.

The bad news, however, is that Republicans came away empty-handed, at least for the time being, in their attempt to limit federal spending. When the deficit has exceeded $1 trillion for four straight years, as it has, then the quid pro quo — spending cuts in exchange for tax increases — is essential

On the way to avoiding the cliff, the Republicans took a beating. Coming on top of the November pounding the GOP suffered, party leaders should learn a lesson that may enhance their chances in future elections and congressional dealings with their Democratic foes. Namely, Republicans have to do a better job of making their case, which they didn't do in the months leading up to the November election or in the final weeks of the fiscal cliff negotiations.

Originally, the debate was intended not only to raise taxes on some high-income earners, but also to cut spending. President Obama got his tax hikes, but the GOP came away holding the bag. Unless I missed something, the Republicans never mounted an effective argument for what wasteful federal spending must be cut, and therefore never created the necessary leverage to strike the deal they set out to make. Instead, the GOP — and specifically House Speaker John Boehner — let the Democrats — principally President Obama — define the debate.

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., recently said that he could eliminate $600 billion from the budget and no one in Washington save a few policy wonks would notice. Only a small handful of American are aware of Coburn's invaluable 202-page "Wasteful Spending — 2012." Coburn listed dozens of examples of crazy spending that would outrage every American if they knew about them.

Among them are $325,000 for an effort to build a lifelike Robo-Squirrel, and $27 million for a project that included pottery classes for Moroccan artists translated by someone who was not fluent in English — and using materials that cannot be purchased in Morocco. My personal favorite is a $516,000 grant to devise a video game "Prom Night," which allows users to relive their prom experiences.

Here are two more examples announced too late to be included in Coburn's exposé. One, Labor Secretary Hilda Solis announced a $2.2 million grant to Haiti and Peru to strengthen their labor unions. And three weeks ago the Labor Department awarded $35 million to fight child labor in Brazil, Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, Panama, Haiti, Tanzania, Burkina Faso and Indonesia. The United States correctly opposes child labor, but those borrowed millions could be put to better use in the United States.

To prioritize spending and eliminate waste, Coburn urges that the budget be subject to a line item review. Making choices about which programs to cut, Coburn insists, is easy, reduces debt and saves money for the truly important entitlements.

Coburn summarized: "The problem in Washington is politicians are very specific about what we should fund but not specific about what we should cut."

Coburn's entire report is available on his press page's website, www.coburn.senate.gov.

Joe Guzzardi is a fiscal conservative who worked for the Lodi Unified School District until his 2008 retirement. Contact him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Recent Comments

Posted 10 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

The questions I have asked have been to you, M, for your point of view, I and I had to repeat myself because you never answered the first t…

More...

Posted 13 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Letter: We must deal with Islamic State…

I seldom agree with anyone, however Paglia got it right, ISIS is a major threat, and at the present time they continue to grow. The bombin…

More...

Posted 14 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: We must deal with Islamic State…

Kevin Your "As for ISIS, ANYTHING the West does to stop them will only strengthen their cause. The action HAS to come from the Middle …

More...

Posted 14 hours ago by Michael Nedderman.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

Finally, M, you did something right! Now I can show you how it is done! This is how you answer a hypothetical question: In response to y…

More...

Posted 14 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

Mr Doyle Be advised that Mr Nedderton doesn't like answering questions. Your questions can only be considered secondary, or tertiary or non…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists