Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Joe Guzzardi: Current politicians have lost Americans’ trust

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, November 16, 2013 12:00 am

What a sorry state America is in when voters can’t trust elected officials to keep their campaign promises. A Gallup poll released earlier this week showed that Congress has reached a new low, gaining the approval of just 9 percent of Americans. This breaks last year’s dismal 10 percent, the previous record.

Gallup has been gauging Americans’ perception Congress’ performance since 1974. The average approval rating is 33 percent with the 56 percent all-time high registered immediately after Sept. 11, 2001.

The sad but true joke on Capitol Hill is that if it weren’t for paid staff and blood relatives, today’s 9 percent rating would be lower. On Fox News, Sen. John McCain said that since his 101-year-old mother recently called him out, he’s no longer confident that Congress can even maintain a mother’s support.

McCain may be laughing, but he’s an excellent example of why the country doesn’t believe politicians. During his 2008 presidential campaign, McCain pledged to “complete the dang fence,” a reference to securing the border between Mexico and the United States. In his 2010 Senate re-election bid, McCain repeated his promise.

Then, in 2012, McCain joined the Gang of Eight that introduced a 1,000-plus page bill that translated into huge immigration increases — but with border enforcement to come five years down the line, if ever. McCain told Washington reporters that he expects to run again in 2016 when he’ll be 80. The chances are that’s one promise McCain will keep and, worse, that he’ll be re-elected.

The Washington mindset reflects the devious strategy: Tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, and people will eventually believe you.

Enter President Obama: “If you like your plan, you can keep your plan.” From 2008 to 2010, Obama reiterated the same assurance multiple times.

Because of the Obamacare fiasco, Americans are reasonably asking themselves if the president can be trusted. The polling results on Obama’s trustworthiness are better than Congress’ favorability score, but still troubling. A Quinnipiac University survey found that 52 percent of Americans say that Obama is not “honest or trustworthy.”

For a president elected twice because voters perceived him as honest and competent, losing the people’s confidence represents a major setback. If America spends two more years questioning the president’s good faith, the nation could become permanently cynical by the time 2016 rolls around.

Millions of Americans have already had their health insurance cancelled. Within months, as many as 23 to 41 million could lose also lose their insurance. In October, only 106,000 signed up for Obamacare, less than 2 percent of the 7 million the Department of Health and Human Services predicted would do so.

The next crunch date is two weeks away, when the administration projects that HealthCare.gov will finally be fully functional. Technical experts think the Nov. 30 date is too optimistic. If they’re right, a new crisis of confidence will emerge.

Obama’s best path out of the muck would be to get behind Louisiana Sen. Mary Landrieu’s bill that would let people retain their canceled insurance, allowing the president to keep his often-made promise dating back to 2008.

In an announcement late Thursday afternoon, Obama made a compromise statement that he would allow insurance companies to keep people on their original health care. “Allowing,” however, is not the same as “requiring.”

After everything is said and done, what it boils down to is that the federal government is simply incapable of managing an insurance program as massive as Obamacare. The best option is to cut loses, and repeal Obamacare sooner rather than later. As I recall, the public was never for it in the first place.

Joe Guzzardi retired from the Lodi Unified School District in 2008. Contact him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Recent Comments

Posted 8 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Voters should focus on a new di…

Ms Kaur What exactly is wrong with atheists?

More...

Posted 9 hours ago by Jeff Tillett.

article: Letter: New York City is behind modern …

"The false unification of religion, economics, and politics..." But aren't you the one trying to unify religion, economics, and …

More...

Posted 10 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Letter: California needs to become more…

Heuer: In a way I agree with you, the state never had Tesla, but were willing to kiss their a** to get it. With all the concessions that…

More...

Posted 10 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Voters should focus on a new di…

Do you mean mr Schmidt the proportional representation would take fringe group from major party like take away tea party from Republican? …

More...

Posted 10 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Voters should focus on a new di…

Mr Schmidt - I was replying to the person who made claim that I only insult her rather than make the facts. Why be insulted - because some…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists