default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Joe Guzzardi How the exploding human population affects Lodi, too

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Bob Marconi posted at 6:11 pm on Tue, Nov 15, 2011.

    Bob Marconi Posts: 39

    Joe has trouble wrapping his mind around the number "billion". Try linking up with our illustrious president who has no problem squandering money we don't have to the tune of "trillions." There's a mind-bender for you.

  • Andrew Liebich posted at 8:01 pm on Mon, Nov 14, 2011.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    Ms. Bobin,
    The fact that the world's recources are grossly mismanaged does not negate the fact that the earth is not over-populated.

    Science Czar John Holdren's book "EcoScience" advocates extreme population control techniques including forced abortions and mass sterilization. Perhaps you agree with him?

  • Joanne Bobin posted at 2:28 pm on Mon, Nov 14, 2011.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Very nice analogy, Mr. Liebich, if all people did was live on their own little 1/4 acre and mind their own business. The amount of land we have has absolutely nothing to do with population explosions.

    What about all of the other resources that humans consume? All the resources that go into the products that are manufactured and purchased? Currently, the US is one of the populations in the world that consumes more natural resources than any other - consider food, water, televisions, cell phones, furniture and on and on and what it takes to manufacture and deliver these products.

    I think that you need to educate yourself on the amount of resources the world's population uses and will continue to use and demand before you can declare that we "have plenty of room" for everyone on earth.

  • joel naatus posted at 6:58 am on Sun, Nov 13, 2011.

    joel naatus Posts: 7

    Mr. Guzzardi,
    In my humble opinion your article purports to follow Europe and China towards a demographic graying of a workforce, which will hinder our country, long after you are gone, through the demise of my generation’s hope of a retirement.
    Your assessment of world population and relating it to the United States and then linking it to Lodi is pure poppycock that focuses on the past rather than the future. The world is a changing place and because of our current population demographics we are well positioned as a country to have a working populace to support retired teachers in Shangri La’s like Pittsburg. Because of immigration and population growth we will have a young workforce that can fill those $25,000 dollar homes in the rust belt like near your current home in Pittsburg. There is plenty of room to grow in areas like Detroit where the population has shrunk by hundreds of thousands in the past 10 years. California has grown because of its diverse economy and government policy over the last 30 years. Drive across this country like I did this summer and you will see a place with great natural wealth, room to grow, and huge economic potential because of our willingness to expand, compete in large melting pot, and grow as other generations did in the past.
    According to an article today in the Wall St. Journal (a bastion of right wing thought) “Whose Economy Has It Worse?” http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204358004577029972941870172.html?mod=WSJ_GoogleNews&mod=igoogle_wsj_gadgv1
    “But the longer-term future appears much brighter for the U.S. than for either Europe or China. America is still the leader in the kind of cutting-edge technology that expands a nation's long-term economic potential, from renewable energy and medical devices to nanotechnology and cloud computing. Over time, these advantages will yield more robust economic growth.
    The U.S. also has a demographic advantage. In Europe, declining birthrates and rising sentiment against immigration point toward a population that will shrink by as much as 100 million people by 2050. In China, thanks in part to its one-child policy, the working population has already begun to contract. By 2030, nearly 250 million Chinese will have passed the age of 65, and providing them with pensions and health care will be very costly.
    Despite debate over illegal immigration, the U.S. population will likely rise from 310 million to about 420 million by midcentury. Between 2000 and 2050, according to Mark Schill of Praxis Strategy Group, the U.S. workforce is expected to grow by 37%. China's will shrink by 10%. Europe's will contract by 21%.”
    In short, please Mr. Guzzardi try looking on the bright side once and awhile regarding immigration and population growth.
    Sincerely, Joel Naatus
    P.S. I live and work near (less than 2 miles) from Wall St. in Jersey City, NJ, I am a former News Sentinel paperboy, and I was born and raised in Lodi.

  • Andrew Liebich posted at 12:34 am on Sun, Nov 13, 2011.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    We could hypothetically give every person in the world a 1/4 acre block of land and they would all fit into an area the size of Australia, each would have enough land that they could all have gardens and grow a substantial supply of their own food, and we would still have 1,603,200,000 1/4 acre blocks, or an area roughly half the size of Queensland left over - plus the entire rest of the world. Now just pause to let that sink in to your brain for a second. ALL the people, thats every man woman and child on earth would comfortably fit inside Australia, each individual person could have a 1/4 acre block of land and we would still have half of Queensland and the entire rest of the planet left totally unoccupied.

    The world is not over populated at all.

  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 12:55 pm on Sat, Nov 12, 2011.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2370

    While Mr. Guzzardi would want us to not try to wrap our minds around the concept of a "billion" anything, I suggest that we don't follow his lead - not just yet.

    He's correct when he states that "the sum is liberally tossed around in everyday language," as it comes to money we're now addressing the issue of a "trillion," which for some actually makes the notion of a billion dollars seem rather paltry. Heck, a "million" dollars is today's "thousand," if we keep with Guzzardi's thinking and I suppose our government’s as well.

    No, people will continue to procreate and in the overall scheme of things that's really a good thing. Hopefully out of all these births will come just a few who might actually be able to wrap themselves around a billion, trillion or more when it comes to our runaway spending and decide to do something about it. After all, what's 7 billion dollars nowadays anyway? Not much. But I suppose that’s far too many people for this tiny little planet to handle. Actually it’s not; and even if it is, what does Guzzardi suggest we do about it? Interestingly, he fails to offer even one possible solution of his own.


Recent Comments

Posted 1 hour ago by Walter Chang.

article: Letter: How is free community college g…

"Gruber" Joel is a dedicated FAUXNEWS viewer and that's ok. But I wonder if he prefers Bill O'Reilly over Megyn Kelley? Since…


Posted 1 hour ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Large class sizes are good for …

File this letter with all the ones about global warming isn't really here ("we don't know what the weather will be like in three days.…


Posted 2 hours ago by Rick Houdack.

article: Letter: The drought is punishment

After reading today's deluded rant I sat for some time, thinking about the mind that fervently believes such things. Then I thought of the…


Posted 2 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Large class sizes are good for …

This is so sad I feel bad for this elderly gentleman who is still living in "the early half of the last century" and has only pro…


Posted 3 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Parents study English, computer skills …

Aside from the technology component that is very useful it is a shame that these parents must learn English using an outdated method such a…



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists