default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Joe Guzzardi Illegal immigrants don’t need legal driver’s licenses

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Joe Guzzardi

Posted: Saturday, March 10, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 7:18 am, Sat Mar 10, 2012.

Los Angeles Police Department Chief Charlie Beck and I have something in common. We're both Southern California natives who grew up in the 1950s when the state deservedly earned its nickname, "Golden." Beck's from Long Beach, I'm from Santa Monica — but I'm sure our memories of California a half a century ago are similar.

Given our shared history, I'm baffled why Beck would be so foolish as to endorse driver's licenses for illegal immigrants as he did two weeks ago.

No one, not even Beck, can argue that giving aliens driver's licenses wouldn't further incentivize more illegal immigration. As it is, California offers plenty of benefits. Parents enroll their children in K-12 schools and can access emergency health and pre-natal care.

But California offers a deal sweeter than most other states. Gov. Jerry Brown signed the Dream Act, which allows alien children to attend California state universities with access to taxpayer funding. Brown has also quashed E-Verify, which confirms an employees' legal working status. Without E-Verify, illegal immigrants can keep jobs that unemployed Californians might want.

Adding to the mystery of why Beck is such an impassioned illegal immigrant supporter is that his family includes five sworn law enforcement officers. Beck's father George retired in 1980 from the LAPD as deputy chief; his two sons are police officers. His sister was a detective, and his wife a K-9 narcotics drug investigator. Let's hope that at least some among them advocate for upholding the law.

Here's how Beck sees the license issue: Referring to what he calls "reality," Beck claims licensing aliens somehow leads to safer road conditions. Beck favors a "provisional" or "non-resident" license. In a farfetched example Beck offered, he speculated that a licensed driver would be less likely to flee the scene of a hit-and-run accident than one who does not have a license. This may make sense to Beck, but it doesn't to me.

With or without a license, multiple variables are at play when a driver flees: Is there a probable fatality? Is he intoxicated? Does he have outstanding warrants? Furthermore, licensed or not, illegal immigrants are the most dangerous drivers according to a study conducted by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. Since California has the nation's highest number of aliens, it also has the most hit-and-run fatalities.

Beck's advocacy calls his judgement into question. Beck's predecessor, William J. Bratton, advocated for licenses without success. During the last 15 years, driver's license legislation has been soundly defeated multiple times. In the late 1990s, Assemblyman Gil Cedillo introduced a bill which he re-introduced so frequently he became known as "One Bill Gil." In 2003, Gov. Gray Davis' promise to sign an alien license bill lead to his recall. Davis's successor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, vetoed similar legislation multiple times. Even the ultra-liberal sitting governor Jerry Brown doesn't like the idea. A history of defeat that long and pronounced should give Beck an idea of how unpopular licenses for aliens are.

Beck is neither a legislator nor a lobbyist. He's appointed to enforce the laws on the books. As part of his duties, Beck oversees nearly 10,000 officers and 3,000 civilian staff. In 2011, Los Angeles had 300 murders as well as thousands of assaults, property crimes and car crashes.

Beck has plenty to do without taking on the irresponsible and impossible task of licensing aliens. The debate about whether aliens deserve licenses wouldn't exist if they were where they should be — back home

Joe Guzzardi retired from the Lodi Unified School District in 2008. He lives in Pittsburgh, Pa. Contact him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Joanne Bobin posted at 11:12 am on Thu, Mar 15, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Joe Guzzardi wrote: " Brown has also quashed E-Verify, which confirms an employees' legal working status. Without E-Verify, illegal immigrants can keep jobs that unemployed Californians might want."

    Why Mr. Guzzardi knowingly continues to mischaracterize this California legislation (AB 1236) signed by Jerry Brown is beyond me. I am sure that Joe Guzzardi knows full well the content of this law, i.e., is does not "quash" E-Verify, it simply says that employers in CA under certain circumstances are not required to use it.


    Mr. Guzzardi states: " Without E-Verify, illegal immigrants can keep jobs that unemployed Californians might want."

    Since E-Verify is used ONLY for new employees, his claim that illegals "can keep jobs" is false.

    According to the DHS website that Mr. Guzzardi cited himself back in October 2011:

    "For most employers, the use of E-Verify is voluntary and limited to determining the employment eligibility of NEW HIRES ONLY."

    Mr. Guzzardi's columns would be much more informative if he did not continually shape the facts to suit his case. I am sure there are many more factual points and statistical evidence that could be used to support his POV.


Recent Comments

Posted 18 hours ago by Walter Chang.

article: Letter: Our leaders need to be better r…

Anyone else hearing the theme song from the Twilight Zone after reading this rant??? [lol]


Posted 18 hours ago by Shane Marcus.

article: Letter: I was impressed with students a…

Yeah Its too bad the blood bank doesn't compensate these giving people in some way. Like maybe a free lunch. After all, giving blood takes …


Posted 18 hours ago by Walter Chang.

article: JoAnne Mounce: California gas tax is a …

[sleeping][yawn][sleeping] ZZZZzzzz....


Posted 18 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Steve Hansen: Funding, researcher bias …

I don't know when you became a scientist Mr Maurer. So far you have claimed a career in music with famous musicians and several other care…


Posted 19 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Steve Hansen: Funding, researcher bias …

Mr Maurer Congratulations on advancing your childhood experimenting with your adult ice chest experiments. Now if I can induce you to advan…



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists