Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

President Obama blatantly panders for Hispanic votes

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, June 23, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:27 am, Sat Jun 23, 2012.

Americans who think that the Constitution is the nation's highest law got a rude awakening last week. As it turns out, an even loftier lawmaking level governs the land: President Barack Obama's personal opinion. Laws Obama doesn't like, like those that enforce immigration, he ignores.

In a demonstration of naked disregard, last week Obama announced that his administration would stop deporting illegal immigrants between the ages of 16 and 31. Of course, there wasn't much deportation going on, but now it's officially dead. The administration conservatively estimates that 800,000 immigrants could be affected; the Pew Hispanic Center more realistically puts the total at 1.4 million. Factor in the inevitable fraud that always goes hand-in-hand with immigration legislation and the final number will be much larger.

Immigration law is set by the Legislative Branch and is not subject to Executive Branch whims. Nevertheless, Obama's edict realizes many of the DREAM Act's objectives — never mind that Congress defeated the DREAM Act in all of its manifestations multiple times during the last decade.

Not only won't DREAMers be deported but — jackpot! — they instead will be given work permits allowing them to immediately compete in a job market where 20 million Americans are either unemployed or underemployed. Many have been jobless for more than six months. From a knee-deep statistical pile of data that underline Obama's callous disregard for non-working Americans, I offer the following. Caution, strong stomach required.

Unemployment for older than 55-year-olds has risen 330 percent in 10 years; 53 percent of college graduates since 2006 cannot find full employment; unemployment among returning African-American vets exceeds 40 percent; and 8 million aliens already hold payroll jobs. Teenagers with or without high school diplomas, and including Hispanics and blacks, have had sustained unemployment levels above 30 percent.

In his Rose Garden speech, Obama ludicrously claimed that his executive order would make immigration policy "more fair, more efficient and more just." But when a reporter asked Obama to explain exactly how his new immigration law is fair to American citizens, Obama turned his back and walked away. The president, knowing that his mandate is the opposite of how he described it — that is, it's unfair, inefficient and unjust — took no questions.

If I were the president, I'd ignore questions, too. Consider this: On the same day Obama exposed his American betrayal, the Bureau of Labor statistics released its latest non-seasonally adjusted data that showed the unemployment rate for foreign-born workers in the United States is lower (7.4 percent) than for native-born workers (8.0 percent).

Obama knows but doesn't care that he's violated the Constitution. Just a few months ago, explaining to a Hispanic audience why he had been unable to fulfill his 2008 campaign promises to deliver comprehensive immigration reform, he said: "I cannot do this alone because there are laws on the books." By end-running Congress, Obama has set out on his own totalitarian and anti-American path.

I'll answer the reporter's question about fairness that Obama brushed off. The only beneficiaries are those who get green cards and their Beltway ethnic identity advocates whose lobbying salaries depend on their successes in subverting U.S. law. Americans — no fairness for them — be damned

Whether Obama will realize his obvious goal of garnering enough Hispanic votes to gain re-election remains to be seen. As his unprecedented executive order receives more publicity and analysis, a backlash from outraged Americans may ultimately undermine Obama's craven pandering.

Joe Guzzardi retired from the Lodi Adult School in 2008. Contact him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

34 comments:

  • Brian Dockter posted at 10:05 am on Sun, Jul 8, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2839

    Ms. Bobin wrote:

    My perception of Mr. Guzzardi and Lodi are much closer to reality than YOUR perception that there are vast numbers of left wingers roaming the streets who are brainwashing individuals into agreeing that George Walker Bush is still to blame for the economy.

    -Chuckle,
    This particular sentiment from Darrell was more tongue and cheek than anything else. I believe it was moreless intended for you since you are the one going around saying there is a bigot around every corner in Lodi. Or do you still believe it is only those who disagree with Obama are the bigots?

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 9:56 am on Sun, Jul 8, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2839

    Joe Guzzardi wrote:

    In his Rose Garden speech, Obama ludicrously claimed that his executive order would make immigration policy "more fair, more efficient and more just." But when a reporter asked Obama to explain exactly how his new immigration law is fair to American citizens, Obama turned his back and walked away. The president, knowing that his mandate is the opposite of how he described it — that is, it's unfair, inefficient and unjust — took no questions.

    -It's clear Obama was put in a position where he had to admit he made a mistake. He chose to not answer the question. Quite revealing.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 9:50 am on Sun, Jul 8, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2839


    Mr Klein wrote:

    Basically, because the administration continues to enforce the law in some form, Obama is in the clear. They are doing what the law intends, deporting those that pose a threat to US citizens and contribute nothing to society. People that grew up here deserve a shot at the American dream. Obama has helped to make this possible for millions.

    -Hmm,
    But how can Obama be so sure all of the parents of the kids are good law abiding parents? And if Obama is doing what the law intends he should be making sure each and every parent is not a criminal. The parents that are criminals should be deported if they are illegals, Or put in jail here if they are citizens. Saying there aren't enough resources to deal with this is just another excuse for Obama not to do anything. No matter how you slice it, Obama is pandering to the Hispanic vote.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 3:14 pm on Fri, Jul 6, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Question Mr Klein. If parents from other countries know that they can enter our country illegally and will make USA benefits like the dream Act automatically available to their children, are will not setting up a strong incentive to break the law.

    If I were one of these parents who wanted the best for my child, I would with out hesitation break the law and risk my deportation knowing my children will reap the rewards.

    Lastly, saying that Obama is still enforcing the law is absurd. You state that Obama is doing what the law intends, deporting those that pose a threat to US citizens and contribute nothing to society. That is equally absurd. If you look at our neighbor, Mexico, they have a complete different view . Anyone caught without papers face jail time. Second offense is prison.

    May I ask, would you be in favor of adapting Mexico's immigration laws and consequences then applying it to Mexican people who do not have papers in USA.

     
  • Stuart Klein posted at 1:30 pm on Fri, Jul 6, 2012.

    Stuart Klein Posts: 6

    The author is attempting to argue that Obama's actions are unconstitutional. However the basis of his discourse is flawed.

    The branches of government each have a very defined function. The legislature creates the laws. The judicial branch determines if the laws are in accord with the constitution. The executive enforces the laws.

    Guzzardi is arguing that by exempting a large portion of undocumented immigrants, Obama has violated the constitution. This is wrong. Obama is still enforcing the law. His resources are limited, and the government cannot deport everyone. Those that were brought here when young did not really violate the law, they were forced to come here. Their parents violated the letter and the essence of the law and are still targets.

    Basically, because the administration continues to enforce the law in some form, Obama is in the clear. They are doing what the law intends, deporting those that pose a threat to US citizens and contribute nothing to society. People that grew up here deserve a shot at the American dream. Obama has helped to make this possible for millions.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 1:00 pm on Wed, Jun 27, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    My perception of Mr. Guzzardi and Lodi are much closer to reality than YOUR perception that there are vast numbers of left wingers roaming the streets who are brainwashing individuals into agreeing that George Walker Bush is still to blaim for the economy.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 9:39 pm on Tue, Jun 26, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Ms Bobin now states...If you have been reading Joe Guzzardi's columns from day one as I have, you would not think that my assertion that he is racially biased was "absurd."

    Ms Bobin previously stated... I replied my reasons, i.e. that Guzzardi uses his status as a columnist with the LNS to promote his racially biased opinions..

    Response... Ms Bobin conveniently changes the character of the post I originally stated as absurd... using one's position to gain advantage is different that just being racially biased...

    However, either way... just has you think Lodi is dominated by bigots and racists, I think your perception of reality is unreliable and distorted asis your opinion of Mr Guzzardi.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 12:05 pm on Tue, Jun 26, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Mr. Baumbach wrote:

    "Let me clarify... I think your assertion that Joe Guzzardi uses his status as a columnist with the LNS to promote what you (Ms Bobin) perceives are his racially biased opinions, is absurd.
    Because it is absurd, it would not surprise me if he did not respond. It does not matter why or if he did not respond as the main point is your absurdity."

    Let me clarify, Mr. Baumbach....I was not speaking of Joe Guzzardi responding to anything. I was speaking of the inquiry that Mr. Hanner made about my use of the word "demagogue" in reference to Joe Guzzardi.

    Apparently, he was satisfied with my explanation - whether he agreed or not, no response was required.

    If you have been reading Joe Guzzardi's columns from day one as I have, you would not think that my assertion that he is racially biased was "absurd."

    I am not the only person to have noticed his blatant bias. I never see any columns in which he complains about any immigrants EXCEPT Hispanics, and in the early days of his columns, he went out of his way to praise all Asians and compare them with Hispanics.

    The only absurdity here is your steadfast claim that Joe Guzzardi is unbiased.

     
  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 3:17 pm on Mon, Jun 25, 2012.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2357

    I expect that the lack of a response to mean that each one of us is entitled to our opinion - regardless of whether or not in agreement. Considering that this is an opinion page and Guzzardi (like all other columnists) are often very opinionated, unless he had written something untrue, the editor of this paper would have very little to say about the matter. This is also true regarding those of us offering our opinions on this forum.

    A "hard news" article, on the other hand would be dealt with under a separate set of rules.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 2:32 pm on Mon, Jun 25, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    I stated...I am not surprised that there was no response. It is such a ridiculous assertion that no response was appropriate. "

    Let me clarify... I think your assertion that Joe Guzzardi uses his status as a columnist with the LNS to promote what you (Ms Bobin) perceives are his racially biased opinions, is absurd.
    Because it is absurd, it would not surprise me if he did not respond. It does not matter why or if he did not respond as the main point is your absurdity.

     
  • Eric Barrow posted at 11:14 am on Mon, Jun 25, 2012.

    Eric Barrow Posts: 1534

    mrm If a person retires today they likely started working around 1963. If you look at the average wages since 1963 through today the grand total of their lifetime income is less than a million dollars. The current social security rate is 6.2% or would be if not for a current tax break that dropped it down to 4.2%. At 6.2% a person retiring today would have paid $62,000 dollars into the social security system. A person retiring today making the average wage last year would retire with a benefit of $872 a month at that rate they would exceed what they paid into SS in less than 6 years. Today’s retirees may have made an agreement with Social Security administration and what a good deal they made but I would not say that they earned the money they receive in retirement. Today there is a lot of talk about revamping the system like raising the retirement age a slashing benefits but those currently retired and those soon to retire are assured that their benefits won’t be touched. It falls to the rest of us to support those who worked during the greatest economic period in history and simply didn’t save enough money.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 10:21 am on Mon, Jun 25, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Actually, I don't know what a "comma" is, Mr. Baumbach.

    I never stated it wasn't pandering. If anyone loves to lie and distort others comments, it is you, Mr. Baumbach.

    I said he was lying about the statements I highlighted in my original post.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 8:38 am on Mon, Jun 25, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Mr. Kindseth wrote: "Joe, good to hear from you and that you are still tweaking the noses of Lodi's Lefties !!"

    Not a surprising comment from a person who associates with an individual who feels the need to warn new non-Anglo neighbors that "he hopes they will be good neighbors - you're not going to park cars on your lawn, are you?"

    True story about one of Mr. Kindseth's associates.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 8:35 am on Mon, Jun 25, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Mr. Baumbach wrote:

    "Ms Bobin stated...I replied my reasons, i.e. that Guzzardi uses his status as a columnist with the LNS to promote his racially biased opinions, but never received a response.

    I am not surprised that there was no responce.It is such a ridiculous assertion that no responce was appropriate. "

    Mr. Baumbach - I have had several email discussions with Rich Hanner on various topics. Some emails do not need a response. I took the lack of response to mean that he had accepted my explanation for labeling Joe Guzzardi a demagogue.

    He stated from the start that he would not delete the comment. He just wanted to know my reasoning for the use of that particular word, which Mr. Hanner apparently found to be legitimate after receiving my explanation.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 8:29 am on Mon, Jun 25, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Ms Bobin stated...I replied my reasons, i.e. that Guzzardi uses his status as a columnist with the LNS to promote his racially biased opinions, but never received a response.

    I am not surprised that there was no responce.It is such a ridiculous assertion that no responce was appropriate.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 8:29 am on Mon, Jun 25, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Since Mr. Baumbach has no ability to make a logical analysis, let me explain.

    The article does not say WHEN they originally commited a crime. Illegals previously deported could have commited their crimes (for which they were convicted in a court of law, not simply for entering the US illegally) prior to the Obama administration.

    Also, you stuck your foot in your big mouth - "ICE number, which boast a 90 percent increase in the number of criminals deported over those in fiscal 2008.

    Since Obama took office in 2009, this means HIS ADMINISTRATION has deported MORE than the previous administrations.

    Amazing how Mr. Baumbach cannot #1: read an entire article so it doesn't come back to bite him in the rear and #2: Make an analysis using those "critical thinking" skills he is always complaining no one has.

    This article was about having ICE concentrate on the deportation of criminals as a priority, rather than concentrating on the average illegal who is doing nothing but trying to make a living.

    Joe Guzzardi lies continually. You just don't recognize it because you agree wholeheartedly with his slanted information.

     
  • John Kindseth posted at 3:39 pm on Sun, Jun 24, 2012.

    John Kindseth Posts: 243

    Joe, good to hear from you and that you are still tweaking the noses of Lodi's Lefties !!

     
  • Patrick W Maple posted at 2:20 pm on Sun, Jun 24, 2012.

    Pat Maple Posts: 1805

    Joe: Are you trying to tell me that BO tells lies? Noooo. Say it ain't so Joe!!

    DB: Are you saying that BO has committed crimes? Not HE DB!

    I have an idea...let's put the older folks, retirees, disabled etc in charge of immigration, education and health care then sit back and watch what happens. These people...who have already paid their "fair share" and who are now getting their "fair share" of the shaft, know how to pinch pennies and have a much better grasp on that which is fair and that which is foul.

    mrc: Half of what you see...none of what you hear. Just keep believing in hope and change...whole heartedly.

    DB: Good post 7:20...factual information always seems to calm them down.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 7:20 am on Sun, Jun 24, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Ms Bobin stated...Joe Guzzardi wrote: "Of course, there wasn't much deportation going on, but now it's officially dead." Why Joe Guzzardi LOVES TO LIE about the facts of the numbers of deportations that have be done under the Obama administration only serves to make himself look foolish.

    Oh my...Why Ms Bobin " LOVES TO LIE and DISTORT"about the facts... it's because she clearly believes the ends justifies the means.

    From "The Hill" (October 2011):Obama Refuses to Deport Illegal Aliens BEFORE They Commit Vicious Crimes... Of the 396,906 people removed from the U.S., more than half of them — 216,698 —had been previously convicted of felony or misdemeanor crimes, according to the ICE numbers, which boast a 90 percent increase in the number of criminals deported over those in fiscal 2008.

    SO unless illegal aliens have committed another crime other than the one they committed by entering our country illegally, Joe is right... there isn't much deporting going on. Since he was also referring to the Dream Act, which guarantees that anyone who benefits from the Act will not be deported, it is beyond obvious the point and intent of Joe's letter was.

    Ms Bobin should be ashamed...but of course...she is not. She is proud to do her part to tear down, destroy or malign Mr Guzzardi no matter what... the ends justify the means.

    I have no problem disagreeing with Joe's positions... but to say he “lies” is disingenuous at best.

     
  • Mark Anderson posted at 8:21 pm on Sat, Jun 23, 2012.

    markanderson Posts: 1

    Gee Joe, it's lucky that Romney wasn't pandering to hispanics. Rubio was trying to cover his huge asinine statements he made in the primary's, but that's all done. Keep trying Joe, sooner or later, someone will believe your hype.

     
  • Robert Chapman posted at 7:18 pm on Sat, Jun 23, 2012.

    Bob Chapman Posts: 997

    Yeah, the nerve of Mr. Guzzardi writing his opinions for all to read. In the opinion section no less. Gazooks, what a dastardly thing to do.

     
  • Robert Chapman posted at 4:28 pm on Sat, Jun 23, 2012.

    Bob Chapman Posts: 997

    Really? A "super majority"? That according to the liberal press. I would love to see the demographics of the supposed poll that showed those results. Polls are easily manipulated to substantiate anything you want them to. I am reminded of a professor that related a story of a politician that asked once of his aides where he was at in the polls. The aide responded, where do you want to be? And so it is. Liberals are so easily manipulated and blindly believe exactly what the liberal establishment tells them to believe.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 3:03 pm on Sat, Jun 23, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Ms Bobin stated...I replied my reasons, i.e. that Guzzardi uses his status as a columnist with the LNS to promote his racially biased opinions, but never received a response.

    I am not surprised that there was no responce.It is such a ridiculous assertion that no responce was appropriate.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 2:58 pm on Sat, Jun 23, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Mr Crowder stated...The last time I called Guzzardi on a blatant lie my post was deleted.

    Hard to believe that someone that perceives he is intelligent would actual believe his post was deleted simply for pointing out perceived truth.

    One could almost classify that kind of thinking as "conspiracy"...

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 2:53 pm on Sat, Jun 23, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Ms Bobin perceives that the end justifying the means debate is ridiculous and has no merit or substance... now that is what I call an embarrassment...really. Instead of making such silly comments maybe you could add something to the conversation.

    In addition, unless Ms Bobin has been in a comma all her life, many politicians including Obama and Bush, pandered and spent like drunken sailors to buy people's votes. It is absurd to think Obama was not pandering to the hispanic vote. If Ms Bobin believes that, Obama would consider himself slick and a political pro if he so easily fooled her.

     
  • Andrew Liebich posted at 12:25 pm on Sat, Jun 23, 2012.

    Andrew Liebich Posts: 2999

    or perhaps we could simply enforce exhisting immigration laws rather than circumvent them via executive fiat...

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 12:06 pm on Sat, Jun 23, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Know this well. Many columns ago, I commented that Mr. Guzzardi was a demagogue and I received an email from Rich Hanner saying he would not delete the post, but wanted to know why I said that.

    I replied my reasons, i.e. that Guzzardi uses his status as a columnist with the LNS to promote his racially biased opinions, but never received a response.

    Rich Hanner or whoever complained about the post, apparently thought the word "demagogue" was an insult.

    Dictionary.com: "person, especially an orator or political leader, who gains power and popularity by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people."

     
  • Andy Crowder posted at 11:12 am on Sat, Jun 23, 2012.

    Andy Crowder Posts: 245

    You're treading in dangerous waters, Joanne. The last time I called Guzzardi on a blatant lie my post was deleted. St. Joe is off limits. He can affiliate with hate groups and racist organizations and still hold a position of honor at LNS.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 10:00 am on Sat, Jun 23, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    And Mr. Guzzardi knows full well that the Constitution was not violated by this executive order. Another falsehood promulgated by this "columnist."

    Perhaps Obama should keep a rolled up newspaper under his shirt and stand at the border. When he thinks no one is looking, he can whack those ill-behaved immigrants and prevent them from doing wrong.

    Just like dog park discipline.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 9:53 am on Sat, Jun 23, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Once again you prove yourself to be a person who only wishes to have his ridiculous comments posted in this forum. No substance.

    Why don't you try "adding to the conversation" for a change, Mr. Baumbach, instead of making up fantasy scenarios of President Obama's "socialist tendencies."

    You are an embarassment, really.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 9:48 am on Sat, Jun 23, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Joe Guzzardi wrote: "Of course, there wasn't much deportation going on, but now it's officially dead."

    Why Joe Guzzardi LOVES TO LIE about the facts of the numbers of deportations that have be done under the Obama administration only serves to make himself look foolish.

    From "The Hill" (October 2011): "The U.S. deported more people — nearly 400,000 — who were in the country illegally in fiscal 2011 than ever before, according to the latest numbers released Tuesday by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) bureau.

    President Obama’s administration touted the startling figures as evidence of its progress in stopping illegal immigration, a record that could help the president win back independent voters who abandoned Democrats in the 2010 midterm elections."

    Mr. Guzzardi - everyone in this town already knows that you are an anti-immigrant fanatic and have a special dislike for Hispanics. That's fine. Just tell the truth and then tell us your reasons for disliking immigrants.

    You would come off as much more credible if you ONLY TOLD THE TRUTH. But you know that lying will garner more support for your racially biased opinions - especially in Lodi.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 8:59 am on Sat, Jun 23, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    I guess the ends justifies the means as long as 51% of the people agree with the desired outcome. Hummm, what else could Obama do that would get the public approval and gain him more votes.

    I know... give every American making less than $60,000 per year a new car
    ( American car of course). There are too many people who cannot get to work or take their children to to baby sitter safely. Im sure he could get 51% approval... and if they register to vote democrat, they get a free tank of gas.

    Then this creates a problem however... to many uninsured drivers. Obama then for the public good, will pay the car insurance for all Americans
    ( who earn less than $60,000).

    In Obamaland, money grows on trees.

     
  • Andy Crowder posted at 8:31 am on Sat, Jun 23, 2012.

    Andy Crowder Posts: 245

    A super majority of voters agree with the president's order as the right and just thing to do. You failed to mention that, Joe. It would appear that the president's action is a reflection of the conscience of a nation.

     
  • Mike Adams posted at 7:23 am on Sat, Jun 23, 2012.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1399

    Pandering for the "Hispanic" vote..... very funny. President already has the Hispanic vote locked up. Same for the African-American vote. One thing that's for certain in the 2012 election is that almost no one in these two groups is going to vote republican and the republicans have no one to blame but their selves.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 13 hours ago by Angie McDaniel.

article: Steve Hansen: Climate change is real, b…

So you admit that Dr. Powell is NOT a relevant expert?

More...

Posted 14 hours ago by Simon Birch.

article: Lodi City Council candidates talk jobs,…

The video of the forum is almost 2 hours long. It took awhile to process. It's now online.

More...

Posted 14 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Vote for a better future for all

This must be most similar to the Sarah Palin who make this claim (and before speak about some of the people are the real American and not o…

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Steve Hansen: Climate change is real, b…

This show interest in juvenile exchanges rather than mature thought.

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Gwin Paden: On learning Welsh, and kind…

This has to be one of the strangest and most ill inform claim I have heard. I think you should go back and do some research Mr Lauchland.

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists