default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Why amnesty wil make immigration reform fizzle

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Friday, March 8, 2013 1:59 pm

Promises, promises — when Congress debates immigration legislation, it promises the moon. But in the end, it delivers nothing. With today’s Gang of Eight amnesty in full-blown congressional discussions, empty vows about interior enforcement, securing the border and putting immigrants at the back of the line are distractions thrown out to appease a skeptical public.

Congress’ amnesty double-talk could have been lifted word for word from the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act. Not only didn’t IRCA enforce immigration law, shore up the border or impose employer sanctions on companies that hired aliens, its failures resulted in millions more illegal immigrants arriving.

In fact, some of the tough laws that Congress pledges it will write into the 2013 amnesty legislation are being broken as they speak.

As an example, several days ago the Department of Homeland Security released thousands of criminal aliens. Secretary Janet Napolitano disingenuously claimed that, because of looming sequestration, she had no money to detain aliens. After public outrage, the White House and DHS engaged in comical finger-pointing. Each blamed the other, and both insisted they didn’t authorize freeing the detainees. Given the disclaimer dialogue, Americans might logically expect that that the in-your-face policy wouldn’t be repeated.

But this week the House Judiciary Committee obtained an internal DHS document that revealed the administration’s plan to release 1,000 additional aliens per week through March 31. Recognizing that freeing more criminals blatantly disregards public safety and noting the DHS has “plenty of funding to detain criminal aliens,” Judiciary Chair Bob Goodlatte called the decision part of a political agenda that has nothing to do with getting Congress’ fiscal house in order.

Another example of empty words is Congress’ laugh-out-loud guarantee to provide electronic verification at the workplace. In 2011, the Judiciary passed the Legal American Workforce Act that would have mandated E-Verify. But the Republican-controlled House refused to bring it to the floor for a full vote, even though it had the votes to pass.

Furthermore, the American Civil Liberties Union has repeatedly announced that it would challenge E-Verify, all the way up to the Supreme Court if necessary. ACLU suits would tie up verification for years.

Putting enforcement further out of reach, Cecilia Muñoz is the White House Policy Council Director and former National Council of La Raza Senior Immigration Policy Analyst. Muñoz has a documented 25-year history of opposing any type of mandatory identification. The chance of a mandatory ID provision winning White House support is zero.

Despite what Americans have been repeatedly told, there’s no back of the line. The instant aliens receive permanent legal residency, they go to the front of the line to receive work authorization and Social Security cards, and they qualify for a cornucopia of welfare benefits. Overnight, 11 million previously unemployable illegal immigrants will compete with more than 20 million unemployed or underemployed Americans.

Finally, amnesty’s price tag would be crippling. The Heritage Foundation’s Robert Rector estimated that, based on what the failed 2007 amnesty deal would have cost taxpayers, the 2013 total will easily exceed $3 trillion over the next two decades.

Based on the administration’s ongoing, aggressive immigration law subversion, no one in their right mind could put an ounce of credibility into the false promises it makes.

Joe Guzzardi retired from the Lodi Unified School District in 2008. He lives in Pittsburgh. Contact him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Robert Chapman posted at 4:05 pm on Sun, Mar 10, 2013.

    Bob Chapman Posts: 997

    Hilarious, now you are the screener for the LNS opinion pages? I can understand your sensitivity to Mexican immigrants since you are married to one. Mr. Guzzardi has never railed against LEGAL immigrants from any country. He, like millions of other American citizens are concerned about the ILLEGAL border crossers, especially the criminals intent on expanding their law breaking enterprises in America and the ones that suck resources from the American taxpayers. Liberals love to stick their head in the sand and ignore this problem, YOU included.

  • Robert Chapman posted at 5:23 pm on Sat, Mar 9, 2013.

    Bob Chapman Posts: 997

    "Guzzardi takes a fraction of the truth and then twists it into whatever he wants people to believe."
    Why, Ms. Bobin, are accusing Mr. Guzzardi of being a liberal Democrat?

  • Robert Chapman posted at 11:07 am on Sat, Mar 9, 2013.

    Bob Chapman Posts: 997

    "I've heard hundreds of stories to the contrary." There ya go, proof positive Mr. Guzzardi is wrong. I have heard hundreds of stories myself. The world is full of authors and tellers of stories. I fear, however, most are just that, STORIES.

  • Joanne Bobin posted at 9:03 am on Sat, Mar 9, 2013.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    At the risk of being told by Guzzardi, per his previous accusation, "not surprisingly" his audience here has no ability to "read closely," I'm curious what information he has to substantiate the following paragraph since he states it as FACT and NOT as OPINION.

    "Despite what Americans have been repeatedly told, there’s no back of the line. The instant aliens receive permanent legal residency, they go to the front of the line to receive work authorization and Social Security cards, and they qualify for a cornucopia of welfare benefits."

    If he knows of illegals receiving these perks, let's hear/see the proof. I've heard hundreds of stories to the contrary. But then, Guzzardi is the expert and he "sees all and knows all."

    More grandstanding from a hatemonger who would rather whip up public fear than face a serious issue with reason and logic and truth.

  • Eric Barrow posted at 4:41 pm on Fri, Mar 8, 2013.

    Eric Barrow Posts: 1604

    Comprehensive immigration reform has got to be Pittsburgh Joe's worst nightmare. Yea.


Recent Comments

Posted 3 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Letter: Ron Portal’s letters repeat the…

Kaur, with your slant on my posts [thumbdown]


Posted 5 hours ago by M. Doyle.

article: Letter: No one’s faith should be scorned

Nope, it was: "Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead." He never implied killing anyone. Either way, what's your poi…


Posted 6 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Letter: Suggestions for committee appoi…

Fiske: Another new guy, you state JoAnne hates Bob, BS I know JoAnne and she is the most fair minded person on the counsel, and has been f…


Posted 7 hours ago by Shane Marcus.

article: ‘Taken 3’ takes a wrong turn with no ch…

This is an opinion, nothing more


Posted 7 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Letter: No one’s faith should be scorned

Ben Franklin also said, The best way to keep a secret between 3 people is to dispose of the first two.



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists