Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Joe Guzzardi Finally, California’s population is stabilizing

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Joe Guzzardi

Posted: Saturday, May 5, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:25 am, Sat May 5, 2012.

In last week's national news, several mainstream media stories reviewed a new and optimistic University of Southern California report about the Golden State's slowing population growth.

According to the USC School of Public Policy, the state's growth has slowed to about 1 percent per annum, a much lower rate than in recent years, especially in the 1980s. During the 1980s, California's population exploded by 26 percent, or 6 million residents. One of the leading reasons for the current decline is, according to the study's authors, a sharp drop in migration — mostly from Mexico.

The report, titled "Generational Projections of the California Population by Nativity and Year of Immigrant Arrival," pointed out the benefits in slower growth, but took an overly positive view of what the new and slightly smaller California will look like. And the report ignored the crucial fact that despite slower growth, California, now at 37.8 million residents, will have 44 million people by 2028. Even if California is fortunate enough to have a 1 percent per annum growth rate for a prolonged period, that would still mean an unsustainable population doubling within about 70 years.

Historically, migratory declines are linked to a depressed U.S. economy. California, more than any other state, has been ravaged by relentlessly high unemployment, steep budget deficits and a catastrophic real estate market. As conditions gradually improve, immigration will undoubtedly return to its previous high levels.

Had the USC professors authored a more comprehensive analysis, they would have included a compare-and-contrast study. Compare California in the mid-1960s, when the population stood at 15 million, to the overcrowded California five decades later. Half a century ago, California, with its best-in-the-nation schools, rich farm lands and a manufacturing base that provided well-paying jobs with comprehensive benefits, was the place to live.

In 21st century California, its bottom-of-the-barrel schools turn out some of America's most poorly educated children. Farms have been pushed to metropolitan areas' edges. American Farmland Trust reported that in the last 25 years, 616,000 acres of prime agricultural property have been paved.

The study also overlooks another important point. Among those leaving (and thereby contributing to the declining population) are California's top earners. A statistical review published by California's Franchise Tax Bureau showed that between 2007 and 2009, returns with adjusted gross incomes topping $500,000 fell to 98,610 in 2009, the latest year available, from a recent peak of 146,221 two years earlier. For California, with its $10 billion deficit and a plan to cut $5 billion from the education budget, losing the tax base that generates most of the social services, funding is a killer.

A more worthwhile perspective on California's temporarily stabilized population would be: "At last! Now let's do everything we can to keep it that way." Measures to prevent another uptick in population growth should include sensible family planning with the goal of no more than two children, stronger border enforcement, vigorous internal ICE enforcement and mandatory E-Verify legislation, which will slow migration to a crawl. E-Verify is a free online program that instantly confirms if an individual is legally authorized to work in the United States.

As long as we're promoting sensible population control measures, 2012 is an excellent time to stop issuing a million permanent residency visas each year. Many settle in California. Those visas include work permits, a foolish practice that's inconsistent with the reality of 20 million unemployed or under-employed Americans.

The USC report does a valuable service by indicating that one of California's most serious challenges, overpopulation, has abated. But at the same time, it misleadingly suggests that the problem has been solved. That's false.

The hard work — making sure future growth is sensibly managed — is just beginning.

Joe Guzzardi, a Los Angeles native, was born during a decade when California's population was 7 million. Contact him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

7 comments:

  • Eric Barrow posted at 8:39 am on Tue, May 8, 2012.

    Eric Barrow Posts: 1348

    The best proven way to slow population growth is through education as women become better educated and are more empowered with well paying jobs they tend to have less children. This is the phenomenon we have seen in many European countries these same countries are encouraging immigration to account for their declining populations.

     
  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 12:51 pm on Mon, May 7, 2012.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2255

    Mr. Guzzardi writes, “Measures to prevent another uptick in population growth should include sensible family planning with the goal of no more than two children, . . .”

    Am I reading this correctly? While we might be somewhat fiscally beholden to China, since when are we to adopt their population goals? This notion of suggesting not having more than two children could easily become a mandate–and then how will that be enforced?

    I would think a better way to achieve population stabilization would be to BEGIN tightening our borders and then returning to their native countries those who have no legal right to be here in the first place.

    But then such ideas will only fuel the fires of a “racist around every corner.” I say, “‘At last,’ bring it on!”

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 12:42 pm on Sun, May 6, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4316

    Do me a favor, Mr. Docktor - never apologize for me again. It really reflects poorly on you.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 12:39 pm on Sun, May 6, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4316

    Interesting that what "Mr. Francis" claims he copied from a "national newspaper" turns out to be a comment from an anonymous poster (probably himself) in response to articles in just two publications that I was able to identify - the Savannah Morning News and the Denver Post.

    See comments at the bottom of this news article:

    http://savannahnow.com/column/2012-05-04/leubsdorf-expect-close-race

    It is clear that this "Mr. Francis" has no connection to this community, nor to California. This is the equivalent of a pampheteer who wishes to spread misinformation in order to someone "prove" his point.

    Another example of Mr. Docktor's wish to believe everything that agrees with his opinions. Try doing some research for a change, Mr. Docktor.

    And, LNS, I find it very suspicious that "Mr. Francis" somehow tracked down Joe Guzzardi's article in order to copy and paste this comment. Looks like he does this as his own personal mission.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 9:40 am on Sun, May 6, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2747

    Actually,
    the majority of Mr. Francis's post has nothing to do with race. All too often, liberals such as Ms. Bobbin attempt to silence a voice of reason by calling them a racist. Tiring it has become. However, when this happens it is an indication something is being published Liberals aren't in agreement with. Hence, the immediate character assasination.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 9:33 am on Sun, May 6, 2012.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2747

    Mr. Francis,

    Thanks for all the info. and you'll have to excuse Ms. Bobbin. She has this idea
    that anyone who cites facts about Hispanics in our public schools they are automaticly a racist.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 11:08 pm on Sat, May 5, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4316

    Don't know where this poster came from. Racist propaganda.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 7 hours ago by Kevin Paglia.

article: Letter: Pastor Frank Nolton forgets abo…

So let's see: Donate your own money to a cause you believe in and get fired amid social outcry. Spend 1/2 hour beating your girlfriend hi…

More...

Posted 8 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: It is now time for honest change

Obama's own words have left you speechless? I understand.[lol]

More...

Posted 8 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: It is now time for honest change

Clarification: Exactly! [thumbup] Mr. Palmer.

More...

Posted 8 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: It is now time for honest change

Can you provide "some documentation" confirming 8 million enrollees? The White House can't. [sleeping]

More...

Posted 8 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: It is now time for honest change

"We the people" doesn't mean the power of government comes from the people? [huh]

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 261

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists