Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Joe Guzzardi President Obama should keep aircraft jobs in the U.S.

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Joe Guzzardi

Posted: Saturday, January 28, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:25 am, Sat Jan 28, 2012.

During his State of the Union address, President Obama portrayed himself as a populist whose administration, should it achieve a second term, will focus its efforts on the common American to restore economic equality. Among Obama's proposals will be to improve education and job training initiatives, especially among the long-term unemployed, as well as offer tax breaks to companies that "insource" jobs back to the United States.

On his jobs promise, Obama has zero credibility. During his 2008 campaign, he pledged that within two years 3.5 million additional positions would be created. Because it includes several variables, job creation math is tricky. But regardless of how the economists calculate the figure, it comes up well short of 3.5 million.

What caught my eye more than Obama's jobs and education pledges — favorite ploys of politicians, after all — was his insourcing reference. Last week, the Obama administration did the exact opposite. The Defense Department awarded a $1 billion Air Force Light Air Support contract to a Brazilian aircraft manufacturer, Embraer, which produces the A-29 Super Tucano.

An American competitor, the Kansas-based Hawker Beechcraft, protested that the bidding and award process was "irregular and opaque." Bill Boisture, Hawker Beechcraft chairman and CEO, said that had Beechcraft been awarded the contract, it would have generated 1,200 "high-quality jobs." Hawker Beechcraft, manufacturer of the AT-6, worked for two years with the Air Force and its industrial partners to develop parameters for the LAS competition. Beechcraft invested more than $100 million to meet the Air Force's specific requirements for a light attack aircraft.

Upon hearing that the Government Accountability Office declined to review Hawker Beechcraft's protest against its exclusion from the LAS competition, Boisture said: "With this development, it now seems even clearer that the Air Force intended to award the contract to Embraer from early in this process."

The motive for sending the aerospace jobs to Brazil is Obama's unshakeable love affair with globalism. During his Rio de Janeiro visit a year ago, Obama urged that in the name of the "global economy," Brazil and the United States should "expand trade." Such a commitment always bodes poorly for American workers.

Most Americans correctly feel that today's economy leaves them on the sideline. A Washington Post/ABC news poll taken recently found that 44 percent think that the economy and economic inequality is worsening. Outsourcing is a major factor in their pessimism.

The poll surveyed General Electric, Caterpillar, Microsoft, Wal-Mart, Chevron, Cisco, Intel, Stanley Works, Merck, United Technologies and Oracle. During the last decade, those corporations cut their domestic workforces by 2.9 million people while hiring 2.4 million overseas. This is a sharp reversal from the 1990s.

A few months before he died, Steven Jobs told Obama the brutal truth when it comes to hiring Americans versus outsourcing. In response to Obama's question about why Apple didn't do more United States manufacturing, Jobs bluntly said that building plants in China is easier because domestic "regulation and unnecessary costs" make it prohibitive. Jobs told Obama that once American firms go overseas, there's no returning.

The aircraft jobs should remain in the United States. To outsource them in today's persistently depressed jobs market is unforgivable affront to American workers.

Joe Guzzardi retired from the Lodi Unified School District in 2008. Contact him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

5 comments:

  • daniel hutchins posted at 9:07 pm on Mon, Jan 30, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1338

    If US Citizen-voters think that this year's voting procedure will be any different than 4 years ago, then I can only feel sorrow for such inability to learn.

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 9:06 pm on Mon, Jan 30, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1338

    I called it, that is, in a general sense.

    During the campaign, I mocked the procedure for eliminating Ron Paul, and I basically laughed at US Citizen-voters for buying into the national media campaign to support President Obama.

     
  • daniel hutchins posted at 9:05 pm on Mon, Jan 30, 2012.

    daniel hutchins Posts: 1338

    Good column.
    My only comment is that I called it 3-1/2 years ago.

     
  • Anthony Tellier posted at 4:32 pm on Sat, Jan 28, 2012.

    elchinero Posts: 1

    Frederick is right: Competitive bidding didn't work out for Beech.
    On one hand, Embraer has been building, selling, and supporting this plane for, what?, a decade or more. Beech's entry is new and untested, unproven.
    Second, the aircraft will be built in Jacksonville, Florida. Similar to the Hondas and Toyotas that are built in the US.

    Obama "probably" did not review the specs, proposals, and detailed engineer reviews. I hep that he assigns knowledgeable people to perform those tasks.

     
  • Frederick Goethel posted at 7:26 am on Sat, Jan 28, 2012.

    Frederick Goethel Posts: 50

    Sorry Joe, but the process used to make the award is called "competative bidding" and American companies, especially in the aeorspace sector, have a long list of over bidding because they were the only games in town. Apparently Beechcraft learned nothing from the Air Force tanker project that was originally awarded to Airbus. They should have put their very lowest bid in first and then hoped they were low enough.

    As for Obama having something to do with this......I know you dislike Obama, but President's have better things to do with their time than worry about fixing a single bid. The Air Force made the decision and it should stand if they have the lowest resposible bid.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 16 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Voters should focus on a new di…

Ms Kaur What exactly is wrong with atheists?

More...

Posted 18 hours ago by Jeff Tillett.

article: Letter: New York City is behind modern …

"The false unification of religion, economics, and politics..." But aren't you the one trying to unify religion, economics, and …

More...

Posted 18 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Letter: California needs to become more…

Heuer: In a way I agree with you, the state never had Tesla, but were willing to kiss their a** to get it. With all the concessions that…

More...

Posted 19 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Voters should focus on a new di…

Do you mean mr Schmidt the proportional representation would take fringe group from major party like take away tea party from Republican? …

More...

Posted 19 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Voters should focus on a new di…

Mr Schmidt - I was replying to the person who made claim that I only insult her rather than make the facts. Why be insulted - because some…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists