Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Joe Guzzardi Immigration policy means jobless rate will remain high

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Joe Guzzardi

Posted: Saturday, June 11, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 5:52 am, Sat Jun 11, 2011.

According to the latest data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, only 54,000 new jobs were created in May. More than half were in the low-paying service industry. As the 14 million unemployed know all too well, the longer they're out of a job, the more time it takes them to find a new one. About 45 percent of those workers have been unemployed for six months or longer, a higher percentage than at any other time since the Great Depression.

According to Richard W. Johnson, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute, being unemployed feeds on itself. Said Johnson: "The longer you're unemployed, the harder it is to find a job." For workers over 62, only 18 percent who lost a job found a new one in within a year. The least lucky are the 1 million long-term unemployed whose benefits have expired.

As is frequently the case during economic downturns, the San Joaquin Valley is the most adversely impacted. A report recently released by the U.S. Labor Department found that cities in the Valley account for six of the 10 metropolitan areas with the nation's worst unemployment rates. Jobless rates range from about 14 to 18 percent, well above the California and U.S averages of 12 and 9 percent, respectively.

Of all the devastated Americans, none is more likely to abandon hope than laid off, over-50 workers whose prospects are the worst for any age group in at least five recessions. Demographers refer to them as the "involuntarily retired."

Nationwide, the average unemployed worker age 55 or older looked for a job without success for 10 months last year, the longest stretch on record. Tellingly, age-discrimination complaints to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission have risen every year since 2007.

Despite having been elected on a platform that promised 3 to 5 million new jobs, President Obama has overseen an 18-month period where 2.7 million jobs have been lost. The White House is quick to blame the Bush Administration. The GOP, on the other hand, emphasizes that Obama has done a terrible job and hasn't come close to fulfilling his campaign promise of jump-starting the economy.

The claim that Obama inherited the mess is, at least in part, valid. But it doesn't excuse Obama's inaction to correct the problem and give American workers a fair chance at the few jobs still available.

At the risk of returning to terrain I've plowed before, I raise the question of federal immigration policy. In light of relentless unemployment, on what grounds can a sustained policy of granting work permits to a million immigrants each year be defended?

Reinforcing the presence of immigrants in the workforce, the BLS, effective in January 2010, began to publish its statistical jobs analysis broken down into two categories: foreign-born and native-born. Those statistics show that, comparing May 2010 to May 2011, foreign-born employment increased during those 12 months by nearly 3 percent while native-born employment during the same period decreased by 2.5 percent.

As long as legal immigration continues at the same level, and assuming that job growth remains static, 9 percent unemployment won't be an aberration, but rather the new "full employment" rate.

Joe Guzzardi retired from the Lodi Unified School District in 2008. He lives in Pittsburgh, PA. Contact him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

6 comments:

  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:55 am on Sun, Jun 12, 2011.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2814

    Last time I checked, the latest book on how to apply political correctness in your life is written by a Liberal.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:50 am on Sun, Jun 12, 2011.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2814

    And the root cause of this is Political Correctness.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:49 am on Sun, Jun 12, 2011.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2814

    It seems to me the tables have turned on the "American Experiment". The oppressed are now becoming the oppressers.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:45 am on Sun, Jun 12, 2011.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2814

    Joe wrote:

    According to Richard W. Johnson, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute, being unemployed feeds on itself. Said Johnson: "The longer you're unemployed, the harder it is to find a job." For workers over 62, only 18 percent who lost a job found a new one in within a year. The least lucky are the 1 million long-term unemployed whose benefits have expired.

    Yep,

    It used to be the semi-retired would get many of the part time jobs. Now, many employers are hiring Hispanics who are much younger. Not that I am against keeping costs down. But, there's nothing more frustrating than having to look for
    someone to speak Spanish so you can ask the clerk a question at the Hallmark store.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:31 am on Sun, Jun 12, 2011.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2814

    Why would Asians, Europeans, etc, immigrating here want to take Spanish to work
    Jobs where the primary workforce is Hispanic. Didn't they come here to live as Americans and speak the PRIMARY language of this country at their jobs?

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:19 am on Sun, Jun 12, 2011.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2814

    Joe wrote:

    At the risk of returning to terrain I've plowed before, I raise the question of federal immigration policy. In light of relentless unemployment, on what grounds can a sustained policy of granting work permits to a million immigrants each year be defended?

    -Well Joe,
    My wife complains we are shipping too many jobs overseas and you complain
    we are granting too many work permits to immigrants. I know you don't like to accept it and neither do I. But, there is undoubtedly ample jobs to go around. Except,
    many of these jobs are in the service industry where a good majority are Hispanic.
    This amounts out to a work environment where one is at a disadvantage if they don't speak Spanish. So, how do we tackle this conundrum? Simple. Demand
    they speak English well enough so English speaking people can communicate with them. And you know very well these" English As A Second Language" classes
    in public schools is just another way of saying in Hispanics eyes English does not have to be their primary language here. So, let's cut the crap and admit how much
    these classes are counterproductive for the English speaking community.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 1 hour ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Questions for Obama supporters

MR Kinderman Just for your information because I now know it to be important to you Ms Pelosi's full name is; Nancy Patricia D'Alesandro …

More...

Posted 1 hour ago by Kenneth Huntley.

article: Lodi exploring park fees

I must say that I'm truly disappointed in the reporter for writing such a one-sided story. Instead of assumptions and heresy, why not actua…

More...

Posted 2 hours ago by Dana Warner.

article: Pit bull euthanized after review

This story is so heartbreaking I can't even hardly take it. It's actually disgusting. Someone in Stockton is looking for their pet... I hop…

More...

Posted 2 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: There is no contest in the gube…

Eh eh, no it doesn't. It makes an allegation only. Anybody, as you should know by now, can make an allegation. Where's the rebuttal? Where'…

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Walter Chang.

article: Letter: Joe Guzzardi’s June 20 column c…

Hi Joanne, good letter. Debunking Joe's nonsense can almost be a fulltime job!! I have to admit that I seldom read anything that the man …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists