Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

J. Kurt Roberts San Joaquin County could save big bucks by switching to vote-by-mail

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

J. Kurt Roberts

Posted: Saturday, October 9, 2010 12:00 am | Updated: 6:19 am, Sat Oct 9, 2010.

This past June, a Grand Jury report recommended that San Joaquin County abandon the time-honored standard practice of having voters actually go to their neighborhood polling places each election day. The report stated that the county could experience an average cost savings of more than $500,000 each and every year if vote-by-mail was made the law of the land, or at least the law of the county.

With there no longer being a need to rent out polling places, pay and train inspectors and clerks who run the polling places, and no need to print and distribute the rather large box of ballots and supplies needed at every polling place, you can see how the savings would quickly add up.

Electronic voting machines, once touted as a revolutionary breakthrough in the way Californians vote, have since been shown to be vulnerable to "hacking" or other electronic manipulation of the vote count.

The website openvotingfoundation.org has actually stated that the Diebold voting machines could be compromised with a simple screwdriver by a person with access and motive, and should be recalled. Not exactly what I would want to here if I were Secretary of State or Registrar of Voters.

Even with that knowledge, though, the machines were still used in every precinct, or rather required, to mollify the Help Americans Vote Act (HAVA), supposedly to make voting easier for persons with disabilities.

In the 2008 presidential election, the election that the Grand Jury report focused on, fewer than 200 total votes were cast on the ATM-type electronic voting machines. All 513 precincts had to be fitted with the rather flimsy devices, at a cost of what the Grand Jury reported to be $2,400 per vote, when the total cost of operating, acquisition, storage and maintenance of the machines is factored in.

As one who had served as an inspector for 9-10 elections in a row until stating my frustration at what I then believed to be a tremendous amount of waste of time, energy and money at one of the state mandated preelection training seminars — well, it is a welcome validation of my views.

It is difficult to gauge whether or not there is at this time, the money and energy, or for that matter the will, needed to make this change in California law happen at this point in time. But since the vote-by-mail numbers in San Joaquin County reflect similar numbers in the rest of the state, it may be in California's best economic interests to follow Oregon's lead and go entirely vote-by-mail.

One thing that is certain is that there is a very significant amount of money that could be allocated elsewhere, if the county were indeed able to make the transition to vote-by-mail only. I'd vote for that!

J. Kurt Roberts can be reached at jkurtroberts@att.net.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 1:21 am on Sat, Oct 9, 2010.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2255

    While I wholeheartedly agree with Mr. Roberts that the electronic voting machines should be eliminated (I currently serve as a voting inspector at a local voting precinct and have yet to have one person use the machine), I cannot concur with his notion to force voting by mail.

    The problem with that is Constitutional in nature, not just affection for having an actual voting place open to cast my vote. The upcoming election is to take place on November 2, 2010. As such, the polls are to remain open from 7:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m. In fact, I'm sure Mr. Roberts recalls the requirement that one official must verbally announce the polls open at precisely 7:00 a.m. and likewise verbally announce it closed at 8:00 p.m.

    Election Day is the last day when people are to register their choice for candidates and other items of great importance. Until that day, many things can occur that would have us change our minds. "October Surprises" aren't always limited to days in October. As such, once one places their ballot in the mail, they are unable to change their vote.

    If forced voting by mail is enacted, those ballots would be required to be placed into the mail well before Election Day - for everyone. I believe the courts would view such a move as a "no brainer" and declare it a violation of the Constitution.

    If folks want to voluntarily vote for mail, that's one thing. And I agree that the rolls have far more people now who choose to vote that way than ever before. But it is THEIR choice.

    So yes, get rid of the machines. But no, don't force people to vote by mail.

     

Recent Comments

Posted Yesterday by jeffreyrinek.

article: San Joaquin County supervisors approve …

Mr. Chang, from your latest comment concerning out of county comments I presume you are referring to me, at the least. Thank you for partic…

More...

Posted Yesterday by Frank Gayaldo.

article: San Joaquin County supervisors approve …

My passion is promoting our local economy. When the sheriff does things like waste $9 million dollars on jail design plans, that has a dire…

More...

Posted Yesterday by Eric Barrow.

article: Letter: Pastor Frank Nolton forgets abo…

Left wing political propaganda nonsense? I thought you weren't caught up in the left right paradigm.

More...

Posted Yesterday by nth degree wise.

article: Letter: Pastor Frank Nolton forgets abo…

Now who is promoting political (right wing) propaganda nonsense? That a sign on a school building (Gun-Free School Zone) is the cause of sc…

More...

Posted Yesterday by Ron Werner.

article: Chris Piombo: Life can be hard for a Do…

The Dodgers, just like the federal government. They think that if you throw enough money at something you can buy what you want. With the …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 67

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists