default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Feckless and clumsy, California's legislators highlight the need for a constitutional convention

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, July 13, 2009 10:00 pm

There will be no state budget in California until October.

What's truly messed up is that it isn't really a bold prediction on my part. The state is already issuing IOUs and its credit rating barely hovers above "junk bond" status, but that doesn't seem to bother anyone in Sacramento, as serious talks about passing a budget are few and far between.

In a move that highlights just how far the leaders are from having a spending plan in place, Assembly Speaker Karen Bass walked away from Big 5 negotiations earlier this week to protest her ideological differences with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. To review, the Big 5 consists of Schwarzenegger, Bass, Senate Minority Leader Dennis Hollingsworth, Senate President Pro-Tem Darrell Steinberg and Assembly GOP Caucus leader Mike Villines.

We need to have a constitutional convention so we can rewrite our laws and create a system that's a little more workable and logical. This yearly song and dance our legislators subject us to must be stopped.

Fourteen states have constitutional conventions every 10 to 20 years, so it's not unheard of or impossible. Even though a constitutional convention in California would feature every bed-wetting special interest group lobbyist clamoring for preferential treatment, it's a necessary evil we must endure. Ninety percent of the budget is tied up in mandatory allocations from past ballot measures. The last time the state passed its spending plan by June 30, "Aliens" was about to premiere in theaters. We can't go on like this.

The Bay Area Council, an advocacy group sponsored by businesses, is pushing for a measure that would mandate a constitutional convention on next year's ballot. It's time to hear them out. Melanie Paulos, communications director for the organization, said the group is pushing for a constitutional convention because it "wants to see Sacramento function again." The four areas the group wants to focus on are the budget, revenue distribution, electoral reform and governance. The group is still finalizing its proposal, but the idea's time has come.

Around this time last year, I was an intern in Schwarzenegger's war room. It's a soul-crushing box with no natural sunlight down the hall from the governor's office. My task was to monitor the media for absolutely anything relating to the governor and send it to his assorted handlers. The position offered me a firsthand look at the utter lack of urgency our legislators displayed during the longest budget standoff in state history.

I was working (more like volunteering) the day Schwarzenegger unveiled the budget clock outside his office as a way of emphasizing the budget crisis. The budget clock featured a digital readout that tracked how many millions of dollars were being wasted while the Legislature went without a budget.

One fond memory is going to the Capitol's cafeteria and seeing the total jump by tens of thousands of dollars in the mere minutes it took to return with my sandwich and Twix. It didn't take long for me to learn not to look at the clock in order to keep my appetite. When they added the framed picture of Jane Fonda due to her induction into the California Hall of Fame, I just started brown-bagging it and avoided the hallway altogether.

Last year's record-breaking stalemate looks more like an appetizer to what will happen again this summer, and the summers to follow, unless the citizens demand a new way of doing things. The special election earlier this year proved Californians are tired of band-aids and temporary fixes.

State law clearly states that legislators must have California's budget agreed upon and in place by the beginning of the fiscal year. For the Assembly and Senate not to have something ready by June 30 every year is not only illegal, it's grossly incompetent. Symbolic gestures like taking a 5 percent pay cut are swell, especially if you are a career politician and can afford it. However, having a budget done when it's supposed to be is a more noble gesture.

Last month, Steinberg naively said, "We're not throwing in the towel on California. There are going to be better days, and we're going to start by getting this done (passing a budget) by June 30."

Surprise. You didn't.

Even more proof that you would be better off throwing in the towel. Only a fresh start will make California any better.

Jordan Guinn is a copy editor at the Lodi News-Sentinel.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • posted at 2:16 am on Mon, Jul 20, 2009.


    anayud, thanks for the link. This part gave me a nice laugh to start my day:"A full-time Legislature, proponents argued, would create a more professional organization and reduce the influence of special interests."I have to say that the suggestion in the article to have "...legislatures made up of people who hold real jobs and spend only part of their time in their state's capital city" is, to me, what our Founding Fathers intended.Great idea!

  • posted at 3:34 pm on Sun, Jul 19, 2009.


    PatI agree with you. Get rid of all of them including the buffoon at the top and start over. Just think how much money we would save in the abused per diem or their wasted salaries.

  • posted at 9:43 am on Sun, Jul 19, 2009.


    Ana: Yep...the three state concept was put forth a few years back. A good idea...but wasted on the way it is. Part-time? Hell...they don't do anything now. Let's just get rid of all of them at all levels and start over. Could it be too much worse?

  • posted at 8:25 am on Sun, Jul 19, 2009.


    Rather than trying to divide the state we ought to return to a part time legislature with strict limitations to their power. Check this article written nearly six years ago: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2003/12/15/jnelson.DTL

  • posted at 7:53 am on Sun, Jul 19, 2009.


    Splitting the state North/South or North/Central/South would be beneficial and many would vote to do such a thing. The problem with this action is Article IV section 3 of the Constitution of the United States. The U.S. Congress would have to consent to it, therefore they would insist on drawing the boundary or boundaries. I don't want to imagine what the result would be.

  • posted at 6:54 am on Sun, Jul 19, 2009.


    Jordan: They don't care! It's all about them and THEIR future.

  • posted at 6:05 am on Sun, Jul 19, 2009.


    RA: Absolutely!!! Great idea!WTF/TF: NCA CCA SCA Three parts gin. We keep the water. No ice!

  • posted at 2:12 pm on Wed, Jul 15, 2009.


    I recommend an even better solution. A politician tax. Politicians always seem willing to stick it to the risk takers and hard working, so why not TAX POLITICIANS (the aristocracy) more than any other group? Initiative anyone? Let's start a true taxpayer revolt. Tax politician pay at an 80% rate and cap their pay and perks.

  • posted at 4:23 am on Wed, Jul 15, 2009.


    Have to say I agree with you on this one, tj.

  • posted at 5:25 pm on Tue, Jul 14, 2009.


    No Jordan, the answer is to split the state, but that will never happen because the liberal coastal cities need the water of the rural north. Ergo, the problem will remain...


Recent Comments

Posted 10 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Ron Portal’s letters repeat the…

So very much the truth Mr Adams - but you forgot to make the mention of the man who spend the millions and finally discover that the Mr Oba…


Posted 10 hours ago by Michael Fiske.

article: Letter: Suggestions for committee appoi…

Ed, everybody knows JoAnne hates Bob. If you don't know that than you don't know squat! Open your eyes. She campaigned against two candidat…


Posted 10 hours ago by Jien Kaur.

article: Letter: Our leaders need to be better r…

The Mr Kindseth wrote that 'America’s attitude toward Royal Emperor Obama changed when he went from “We the People” to “Screw the People”' …


Posted 11 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Steve Hansen: Funding, researcher bias …

Skepticism is a smart way of saying "I DON'T KNOW." No more no less. It is not a lofty intellectual endeavor. It is used by the …


Posted 11 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Ron Portal’s letters repeat the…

A correct assumption instead: Mr. Portal, like most conservatives, utilize information that is not true and when they do use the correct …



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists