default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

It's not hopeless at Lawrence, Sutherland schools

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, March 13, 2010 12:00 am | Updated: 11:33 am, Thu Jul 22, 2010.

The "bad headlines" concerning Lawrence and Sutherland schools don't mean the situation at these schools is hopeless.

They've been judged to be "Persistently Low-Achieving Schools." But years ago, Lawrence won Lodi Unified School District's first when Distinguished School Award, things weren't always off track. And with good decisions, the kids might dig their way out of the "pit" of being in the lowest 5 percent.

There's no glossing over that students at these schools aren't measuring up. It's been going on so long that state and federal laws are forcing Lodi Unified School District to make changes.

Moreover, the Obama administration wants to use "stimulus money" to improve test scores at under-performing schools. With the right application, Lodi Unified could bring in as much as $2 million for Lawrence and Sutherland. Say what you want about the wisdom of taking borrowed money from the federal government, but helping the kids at Lawrence School is a worthwhile endeavor.

Just ask Dutch Williams. He's the retired principal of Tokay High School, and since 1999, he and his fellow Kiwanis Club members have been volunteering at Lawrence School.

To him, there's no mystery as to why test scores are so low.

"The biggest problem at that school is the kids are second-language kids," he said.

Besides struggling with English, most of them are poor. Some have roots in the most impoverished parts of Pakistan. Most are the children of seasonal workers who take them out of school for long stretches and bring them back when Lodi's vineyards need tending.

High turnover of the student body makes it difficult for teachers to have a lasting impact, explained Linda Kopic, the retired school administrator who has been temporarily assigned to lead Lawrence School.

But Lawrence is not a barrel of bad apples. It's not overrun by drugs, violence or gangs. For the most part, kids are obedient and their parents encourage learning, even if Lawrence is their first encounter with American public education.

When Williams — a grandfatherly guy — walks on the schoolyard, he is smothered in hugs.

"You're like a rock star on this campus," former principal Vince Arias once told Williams. He loves the kids at Lawrence School, and frankly, I do, too.

I spent my time for this column looking into Lawrence School because my kids went there. I was PTA president in 1997-98.

Sutherland, like Lawrence, has many impoverished families and English learners. It's located in Stockton and serves fourth-, fifth- and sixth-graders only. I hope that most of what I say about Lawrence will be useful to parents at Sutherland.

(By the way, Friday's paper reported that the state took Lodi Middle School and McNair High School in Stockton off the problem list.)

The judgment that Lawrence and Sutherland schools are Persistently Lowest-Achieving is important because there's a good possibility something good can come out of it.

The law now requires LUSD to shake things up by choosing one of four actions — "models," in edu-speak.

1) "Turnaround model" means firing the principal, requiring half the staff to re-apply for their jobs, plus "adopting a new governance structure; and implementing an instructional program that is research-based and vertically aligned from one grade to the next, as well as aligned with California's adopted content standards." (To tell you the truth, I don't know what that means, so keep reading the paper.)

2) "Restart model" means creating or fostering the creation of a charter school.

3) "School closure model" means closing the schools and sending the students elsewhere.

4) "Transformation model" means firing the principal, increasing the number of hours of teaching, and implementing "a series of required school improvement strategies." (Again, I'm in the dark.)

Assistant Superintendent Catherine Pennington told me the administration will probably recommend option 1 or 4 "in the coming weeks." The LUSD board, of course, makes the final decision.

She said there's no serious thought being given to close Lawrence or Sutherland.

But what about charter schools?

And, perhaps more importantly, what about the fact that Lawrence doesn't have a principal at all right now?

Forgive me, but this column is running long and I want to discuss the leadership issue and charter options for Lawrence. I'll pick this up on Monday.

Have a nice weekend.

Marty Weybret is publisher of the Lodi News-Sentinel.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • posted at 4:43 am on Sun, Mar 14, 2010.


    It's great to see that Mr. Weybret has finally developed a follower after all these years. And actually signed his own name to an op-ed.

  • posted at 4:09 am on Sun, Mar 14, 2010.


    It is a pleasure reading a column exhibiting interest and experience. Next to the “throw the bums out” crowd, Weybret is a pillar of reason. School spending and student education have always been a battlefield. It doesn’t seem so long ago that a nearby school district had to be taken to court to prevent administrators from punishing students who came to school when the grapes were ready to be put down. Miracles can happen if given the chance and Weybret and Dutch Williams point to issues that are key. (1) Dismissing the performance of students that work hard to move from far below grade level to slightly below grade level is harsh, punitive and unrealistic. (2) Lawrence is not a “barrel of bad apples” but a cohort of students who refuse to measure themselves by their disadvantages. (3) Let the teachers implement programs that increase student opportunity by putting chalk on the board. If these programs increase instructional time, it is a side-effect but not a goal.


Recent Comments

Posted 16 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: Release of CIA interrogation me…

What do you want to bet, terrorists the world over know our methods. The only ones who are expressing wonderment are those who don't like …


Posted 16 hours ago by Shane Marcus.

article: Letter: Michael Brown started events th…

The following is the last sentence in the first paragraph of this story: "He himself put into motion a series of events that ended his…


Posted 18 hours ago by Todd Cronin.

article: Letter: Release of CIA interrogation me…

***GOD & COUNTRY*** That's right mike we will show them heathens who owns it !!!


Posted 18 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: What about others who break the…

Jien Thanks. I heard this on TV news and wanted to look it up but you saved me the effort. The Brown family is hoping to get the court to o…


Posted 19 hours ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: Michael Brown started events th…

Ed, Is there some one you can have proof your writing? Where do you begin with this letter? I would need to... But then... So never mind…



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists