Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Faith in Lodi and the region Marriage isn’t church-based; it should be open to anyone in love

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

David Diskin, founder of Stockton-Area Atheists and Freethinkers

Loading…

Posted: Saturday, April 13, 2013 12:00 am

This week, the Stockton-Area Atheists and Freethinkers gathered at University of the Pacific for a live reading of "8 — The Play." We joined with those of other worldviews and faiths to listen to a dramatic, emotional and sometimes comical portrayal of the trial that turned the tides toward marriage equality.

Wearing an "atheist" label has little to do with someone's position on equality, but it's no secret that an overwhelming majority of atheists are in support of it. Without religious dogma holding us back, we've been consistent supporters of equality. Through our volunteering and our checkbooks, we fight just as much for marriage equality and women's rights as we do to preserve the separation of church and state.

Some proponents of "traditional marriage" have claimed that the purpose of marriage is to raise a family. But reason shows us the fallacy in this argument.

If we are to base marriage on the ability to procreate, we would have to deny marriage to millions who suffer from reproductive limitations or choose not to have children. Further, it has been demonstrated that same-sex parents are just as likely to provide a healthy, loving home.

Many of our religious brothers and sisters claim that marriage is a biblical construct, one deeply rooted in our origins when Eve was created for Adam. Even if we ignore that marriage existed prior to religion, we can consider the legal implications to this argument.

Simply put, if marriage is strictly in the realm of religion, it has no place in the state. If we are to take that position, we must do away with the tax benefits that married couples enjoy, the health-care benefits for married partners and even the benefits awarded to widows, benefits that, today, are generally unavailable to the lesser equivalent of a marriage, the civil union.

But the arguments don't matter. Nor does it matter what religion you follow, nor your race, nor your sexual orientation. If two people love each other enough to tie their lives together — their families, their finances, their futures — why should their orientation matter? Why stand in their way?

As we learned at the "8 — The Play" performance, marriage is even more than love: it's a legal contract, it's protection for child custody, it's tax benefits, it's health care, it's end-of-life rights, it's hospital visitation, it's workplace benefits and so much more. It's about being able to refer to someone as — not your "domestic partner" — but as your husband or wife.

In a country that has prided itself on life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, who are we to tell a couple in love that they are not entitled to the social and legal benefits of marriage?

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

3 comments:

  • Thomas Heuer posted at 2:50 am on Sun, Apr 14, 2013.

    nth degree wise Posts: 1404

    Nicely done David. And yes the play "8" was excellent and informative. I enjoyed every minute of it and so did my wife. Your heart goes out to those effected by senseless discrimination.

     
  • Sarah Elizabeth Tygert posted at 12:46 pm on Sat, Apr 13, 2013.

    Sarah Tygert Posts: 50

    Very well said! I think you covered all the arguments, and did so perfectly and succinctly. It was inspiring even to me, who agrees with this perspective. Thank you for writing it.

     
  • David Diskin posted at 9:25 am on Sat, Apr 13, 2013.

    David Diskin Posts: 181

    Those interested in the Stockton Area Atheists and Freethinkers can learn more about our group and upcoming events at www.StocktonAAF.org.

    All are welcome.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 9 hours ago by M. Doyle.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

Christina, words are important. Thomas confirmed for you that using 'truth" is unsatisfactory in this kind of discussion. Facts are …

More...

Posted 10 hours ago by M. Doyle.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

Nedderman. I'm open to any and all evidence in support of whatever you want to claim. If you could demonstrate a violation of the laws of…

More...

Posted 10 hours ago by M. Doyle.

article: Letter: Thanks for the discussion on th…

Kevin, there is no logic in your disingenuous argument. Repeatedly I acknowledged that there was more to life than facts. Repeatedly, I s…

More...

Posted 11 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Letter: We must deal with Islamic State…

Kaur: You state that many countries were against the invasion of Iraq. For the record Kaur, the Congress of the United State were OK with…

More...

Posted 12 hours ago by Eric Barrow.

article: Letter: We should not look to governmen…

Excuse me it should have said Jerome not Darrell

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists