Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

George Neely Providing some clarity regarding an executive chef for Lodi Unified schools

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

George Neely

Posted: Thursday, April 19, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:41 am, Thu Apr 19, 2012.

It seems that the idea of an executive chef for Lodi Unified School District has stirred the pot a little. Bad puns aside, at last count there was an editorial, a letter to the editor, a guest column, and 36 blog posts, so I think it is only appropriate that we clear up a few things on this subject.

Hiring an "executive chef" was not an item that was being considered by the board at the March 27 meeting; it was part of a report brought to us by our Food Services Department. LUSD departments occasionally report to the board about successes and challenges in their specialty area. They also suggest ways to improve the performance of that department. Warren Sun, the head of Food Services, was doing exactly that.

The idea of an "executive chef" was not up for vote or debate. It was simply part of a report. Board members asked Mr. Sun about his report and proposal and then thanked him of the excellent job he has done managing the Food Services Division.

Having said that, the question still remains: Why would anyone bring the idea of an executive chef to the school board? Like everyone else, when I first saw this on the report, I cringed at the mere thought. I didn't care how much money we have, I did not want to establish a position for an executive chef!

As it turns out, as I looked at our situation and then dug a little deeper into the report, I better understood Mr. Sun's proposal.

The Food Services budget in LUSD is about $15 million a year. About $11 million is from the federal government, about $1 million is from the state, and the other $3 million comes from student purchases. We serve more than 5.4 million meals a year at 48 sites throughout our roughly 350 square mile area. Seventy-one percent of our 28,000-plus student body eats lunch at our facilities daily, and about half that number eats breakfast.

Our Food Services Division is not a small operation.

Mr. Sun has done an excellent job managing his division. He has been able to control cost, increase the use of our facilities, and provide more nutritious meals by, among other things, using fewer prepared and packaged meals and moving more towards site preparation. Our Food Services Division has been able to realize significant savings and produce higher quality meals while staying under budget. Though his efforts, we have a significant reserve in our Food Services budget.

In his letter to the editor, Mr. Weber seemed to believe that this money could be used for other education-related expenses. The same view was shared by some of the bloggers who commented as well.

Unfortunately, that is not the case. Those funds can only be used by the Food Services Division. We cannot use them to lower class sizes, buy classroom supplies, or for any use other than food services.

That is NOT to say that we should be any less vigilant about ensuring the money is used wisely, but we need to remember that these funds are specifically for producing nutritious and appealing meals for our students. That is where the proposal for the executive chef comes in (I still cringe every time I have to use that title).

Mr. Sun's proposal is to add an executive chef with a salary of $81,000 per year. When combined with benefits, the personnel cost of the position would be about $100,000 annually. The other $32,000 mentioned was for position-related expenses such as supplies and technical support.

Still, $100,000 is a lot of money — but if you look at the qualifications and the job description, it starts to be a little more palatable (pun intended).

Mr. Sun wrote in his proposal that the successful candidate for the position would have a four-year degree in business, nutrition, hospitality or a related field and have two years of culinary school. In addition, the candidate would have five years work experience in the culinary arts field at the executive chef level.

The executive chef will have many duties, including developing healthy, appealing menus that meet the new lower sodium requirements from the federal government that will soon take effect. These new requirements will necessitate the further movement away from pre-packaged, prepared meals.

In addition to developing the menus and working with suppliers, the executive chef would also train and monitor the 36 food preparation sites within the district. Another part of the job would be to become involved in the education of students through our own Culinary Academy at McNair High School and assist in the development of nutrition curriculum for our health classes. There are other duties as well, but space here is limited.

I completely understand why people are concerned about a report of spending $132,000 of taxpayer money on an executive chef. But if you look closely at what Mr. Sun is proposing, you can see that his intent is to use the money to improve the quality of food and education for our students, while meeting the stringent new federal requirements.

It's money we have; it's money that has to be spent in the food services area. I just wish that we had called it something besides an executive chef. "Master cook" maybe?

George Neely, a former military officer and Lodi Unified teacher, is a member of the Lodi Unified School District board of trustees.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

4 comments:

  • roy bitz posted at 5:02 pm on Sat, Apr 21, 2012.

    roy bitz Posts: 489

    According to the original LNS article, Mr. Sun said " we believe federal money would be available to pay for this position". He asked "why shouldn't we get it and upgrade our program"?
    I find this mindset troubling. The thinking seems to be ----hey there is federal money available--- let's find a way to get it before some other entity does.
    Folks--- the federal bank account is fifteen trillion dollars in the hole and this mindset is digging the hole deeper by competing for "upgrading" an already massive and in my view overfunded program.
    I sincerely hope the board and Mr. Neely will not add more cost to this massive and again---in my opinion--over funded funded program.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 2:05 am on Sat, Apr 21, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9403

    Ms Bobin stated...Please I find it odd that Mr. Baumbach would propose a title with the word "Tzar" in it given his strident opposition to the presidentially appointed "czars" that have been a tradition in US government since the early 20th century.

    Please leave politics out of this Ms Bobin... I was simply making a point that if we had this position filled, it would be great to give some power to it where real change can take place... I was attempting to be constructive.

    If you want to talk politics, maybe the thread where you identified Kim as a bigot would be more appropriate.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 9:21 am on Fri, Apr 20, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4308

    George Neely provides some excellent and much needed clarification to a topic that was seemingly ill-reported from the start (according to this column).

    Mr. Sun's goal certainly seems to be one that is needed since the LUSD lunch menu hasn't changed very much since my own kids were in elementary school. I remember on occasion they would call me at work and plead not to make them purchase school lunch on the few days we forgot to get their lunch sacks in their back packs. The dreaded "Texas Straw Hat" was perhaps the most offensive - a pile of Fritos topped with greasy chili con carne.

    Mr. Baumbach commented "Maybe the title to the position should be food/nutrition specialist Tzar. A chef normally does not consider what is good for the body but what tastes good.

    I find it odd that Mr. Baumbach would propose a title with the word "Tzar" in it given his strident opposition to the presidentially appointed "czars" that have been a tradition in US government since the early 20th century.

    There are many chefs who focus on good-tasting, nutritious food made from "locally-sourced" ingredients. We certainly don't need a Paula Deen. Perhaps an Alice Waters or Jamie Oliver might better fit the bill.

    The first step - getting the kids to WANT to eat nutritious food. According to Dr. Culler in Wednesday's article, we can't just put a plate of salad ingredients topped with a blob of ranch dressing in front of kids and expect good results.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 11:13 pm on Thu, Apr 19, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9403

    Mr Neely stated...That is NOT to say that we should be any less vigilant about ensuring the money is used wisely, but we need to remember that these funds are specifically for producing nutritious and appealing meals for our students. That is where the proposal for the executive chef comes in (I still cringe every time I have to use that title).

    As normal, Mr Neely writes a responsible informative letter that clarifies. My only concern would be how much power would this position hold. If the goal is better nutrition and better tasting food, I would welcome the position and consider it money well spent. However, if pizza and fried food that simply taste better, still ends up on the menu, what is the point?

    It is one thing to hire a person with intellectual knowledge but quite another for this person to implement changes that nutritionally, is in the best interest of the children.

    Maybe the title to the position should be food/nutrition specialist Tzar. A chef normally does not consider what is good for the body but what tastes good.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 14 hours ago by Joe Baxter.

article: Letter: Pastor Frank Nolton forgets abo…

Fighting for "civil rights". Who defines civil rights? It is clear the LGBT isn't stopping at "civil rights", they are …

More...

Posted 16 hours ago by Brian Dockter.

article: Letter: Obamacare is not the program pr…

And of course it's not a matter of plagiarizing. It's what's plagiarized. Right, Ms. Bobbin?

More...

Posted 16 hours ago by Brian Dockter.

article: Letter: Obamacare is not the program pr…

Chuckle, Had the letter been plagiarism and thus citing the positive attributes of Obamacare, we wouldn't have heard a peep of criticism f…

More...

Posted 24 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Pastor Frank Nolton forgets abo…

Well said, Mr Heuer. Your line about is it a woman or a man made me think of the song "Turn the Page." That'd be the perfect t…

More...

Posted Yesterday by Christina Welch.

article: San Joaquin County supervisors approve …

You are a good man, Walter.... Quack on, baby!! [beam]

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 100

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists