Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

George Neely An Education Multiplier

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

George Neely

George Neely, Lodi Unified School District trustee

“It’s a misconception that we can’t get rid of a teacher who’s not performing. If we’re having a problem with a teacher, there are ways we have dealt with that in the past.”

George Neely, Lodi Unified School District

“I don’t think there was anybody there who didn’t want to bring graduations back, but there are physical limitations.”

Posted: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:36 am, Fri Aug 15, 2014.

The first years of the 1970s saw the U.S. involvement in Vietnam and the military draft coming to an end. The size of our military began to shrink, despite an increased threat from the Soviet Union in Europe as they continued to build a larger and offensively oriented force.

The U.S. military found itself at a real numerical disadvantage, and this problem was further aggravated by the lack of political and public support for the military following the Vietnam War. This was truly the proverbial rock and a hard place. The military was faced with an increasingly difficult mission coupled with declining support and personnel, a situation our current education leaders can certainly appreciate.

Thankfully, our military leaders did not wait for more support to meet their mission. Instead, they recognized their predicament as their new situation. They decided that if they couldn't increase the size of their forces, they would increase the effectiveness of their current forces.

To accomplish this new strategy, they embarked on a mission to make our armed forces the best-trained and best-equipped in the world. They introduced new technology to servicemen and women and taught them how to use it. They gave our forces technologically advanced weapons, equipment and support that had greater capabilities and flexibilities.

This plan was known as Force Modernization, and the new tools employed were known as Combat Multipliers.

In education today, we face a similar situation. A reduction in education funding has resulted in fewer teachers, which in turn has resulted in larger class sizes. We have fewer people to perform a challenging mission. So what impact do increased class sizes have on our students' performance? That's a good question, and one that does not have a simple answer. Intuitively, I would respond that increased class sizes result in lower student performance due to a decrease in individual attention to the students. From my core, I have always believed that to be the answer.

However, the common answer given by those who have studied this question is that the research is inconclusive. Why?

There are a great number of things that affect student performance, both in and out of the classroom. In order to have accurate data, you would need to isolate or compensate for all other variables so that only the issue of class size is relevant to the outcome of the research. Some researchers have gone to extreme lengths to meet that goal, but they still recognize that perfect isolation of class size is impossible.

Most research does agree though that class-size reduction has the greatest impact on the lower grades, and that impact does not materialize until the size of the class gets to be 20 or less. It has been noted that the greatest impact was seen in kindergarten, and the higher the grade, the lower the impact.

Many studies have failed to make any correlation between class size and performance after third grade.

Class size reduction in a district as big as Lodi Unified is extremely expensive. During budget discussions last year, I learned that the cost of lowering our average K-3 class size from 29 to 28 would be more than $400,000, and that number would increase for each succeeding reduction of one student. Additionally, this becomes an ongoing commitment, not a one time cost.

I want to note that there are some state funding incentives for reducing class sizes for K-3 to below 24, but the cost of getting to that point is obviously significant in this period of reduced funding.

There is also the problem of managing class size at the individual schools.

Consider this real world example: You set your kindergarten class size goal of 20, and then have 28 students register for class. The families of those 8 additional students don't want their children bused to another school, but that might be the only option that we can offer, short of hiring another teacher. It's possible in this scenario that we might even lose some of those students to a charter school and thus reduce our funding even further.

So, even though at my core I still believe that the best possible situation for our schools is to have fewer students in any class, I know that we have to understand that achieving smaller class sizes is not, in fact, our goal. As I have said in earlier articles, that goal must be to prepare students for life after high school.

One of the ways to meet our objective in this time of reduced funding and personnel is to take a look at how those military leaders handled their situation back in the 70s. They knew they couldn't increase the number of people they had, so they made a decision to make those people more effective through technology.

This is the same tactic used by almost every business. As a result, we have seen the productivity of individual workers increase.

And yet, we in education still want to do it with sheer numbers.

Yes, I would like to have it both ways, but the bottom line is that we don't have the money. I don't want to replace teachers with computers, but I do want to quit fixating on class size and make the educators we have more effective through the implementation of modern technology. Technology needs to become our Education Multiplier.

Lodi Unified School District trustee George Neely is a former military officer, General Electric executive and public school teacher.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Recent Comments

Posted 1 hour ago by trista aquino.

article: Letter: Evil is always present

Well thats kinda my point- I wasnt saying anything about our soldiers, or theirs for that matter- only the act of taking another humans lif…

More...

Posted 3 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: General Mills announces ‘preliminary de…

Cronin: That smell in the air is the smell of a failing business, otherwise known as sour grapes. [sad]

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by Eric Barrow.

article: General Mills announces ‘preliminary de…

My mistake discussion is still open. Robert if it's been in the works since 82 why do you suppose Anderson had to call a meeting with Katz…

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by Eric Barrow.

article: General Mills announces ‘preliminary de…

I wonder why Walmart tried so hard to move here. Did the LNS really suspend discussion on this topic?

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by Kevin Paglia.

article: General Mills announces ‘preliminary de…

Hmmm, It is painfully obvious that some people are just always in attack mode. NO WHERE did I say General Mills closure was due to their …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Featured Events

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists