Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

JoAnne Mounce I urge all Lodians to support Proposition 22 — here's why

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

JoAnne Mounce

Posted: Thursday, October 28, 2010 12:00 am | Updated: 7:04 am, Thu Oct 28, 2010.

As the Central Valley Division Director of the League of California Cities and your council member, it is my job to fight for you and to help protect your tax dollars.

It is time to stop state politicians from raiding local taxpayer funds that are supposed to be used at the local level for vital local services like emergency 911 response, police, fire, libraries, parks, transportation improvements and more. Your "yes" vote on Proposition 22 will stop state raids of local government funds.

For too long, Sacramento politicians have used loopholes in the law to take billions in taxpayer funds dedicated by the voters to local government and transportation services. The state Legislature took and borrowed $5 billion in 2009 with no plan to pay the money back. Lodi was raided for $1.2 million, which means a whole department would have been shut down if the City Council did not find a way to sell the loan at no cost to the taxpayers. The state Legislature should not be able to take back property tax, sales tax or transportation tax that belongs to you, the citizens of Lodi.

Lodi cannot be left at risk of the state balancing its budget on our backs.

But by voting "yes" on Proposition 22, we can stop state lawmakers in Sacramento from raiding funds that don't belong to them. Prop. 22 will:

  • STOP the state from taking or borrowing local tax dollars dedicated to cities and counties to fund vital local services.
  • STOP the state from taking or diverting gas taxes we pay at the pump that voters have dedicated to transportation purposes.

By stopping state raids, Prop. 22 will protect the vital local government services that protect public safety, improve our local economies, and enhance our quality of life, including:

  • Police and sheriff patrols.
  • 911 emergency dispatch.
  • Paramedic response.
  • Fire protection.
  • Senior services.
  • Youth anti-gang and afterschool programs.
  • Neighborhood parks and recreation programs.
  • Local libraries.

By voting "yes" on Prop. 22, we also protect gas tax funds from state raids and ensure that gas taxes we pay at the pump are used as voters intended, to:

  • Fund road safety improvements.
  • Fund pothole repair.
  • Fund traffic congestion relief.
  • Fund mass transit, like buses and commuter rail.

Prop. 22 is a straightforward measure. Prop 22 simply ensures that our existing local tax dollars and existing gas taxes cannot be taken away by the state politicians. It requires state legislators to stop raiding funds that don't belong to them. And most important during these tough economic times, Prop 22 will not increase taxes.

That's why Prop. 22 is supported by such a broad and diverse coalition of public safety, labor, business and taxpayer groups, community groups, senior and local governments groups, including the California Fire Chiefs Association; the Peace Officers Research Association of California, representing 60,000 public safety members; the California Police Chiefs Association; Automobile Club of Southern California; the California Library Association, representing 3,000 librarians across California; the California Transit Association; and the League of California Cities.

Literally hundreds of groups support Prop. 22 because it will protect the services you and I depend on every single day. Remember: for your community, for your family, and for you, vote "YES" on Prop. 22.

I would be delighted to speak with anyone who may have questions or concerns. You may reach me at 333-2814 or at jmounce@lodicitycouncil.com.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

3 comments:

  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 6:29 am on Fri, Oct 29, 2010.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Josh, I like your fathers technique.... the paper is a great measure since they are likely to have staff that can read and comprehend what they read. Since they have investigated the item of concern, and it is most likely well thought out, you can be assured that by voting the opposite the paper, you will not make many mistakes in voting what you approve of.

     
  • Josh Morgan posted at 10:15 am on Thu, Oct 28, 2010.

    Josh Morgan Posts: 532

    Darrell, when I was growing up the local paper my father read was quite liberal. If he was ever in doubt how to vote he would check the paper to see who they were endorsing and vote the opposite.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 5:55 am on Thu, Oct 28, 2010.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Opponents of Proposition 22, includes the California Teachers Association, and therefore that alone would suggest a yes vote is in order here.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 1 hour ago by Thomas Heuer.

article: Letter: La Raza does support illegal im…

[thumbup] Thank you Walter I couldn't have said it better myself without taking 4 times as many words.

More...

Posted 2 hours ago by Joseph Wood.

article: Lodi Academy students on their way to h…

Another example of the incredible community spirit that exists in Lodi. It's a never-ending story.

More...

Posted 5 hours ago by Joe Baxter.

article: Letter: Friend’s car was wrongfully tow…

I have no sympathy for people who blatantly violate the law then whine when they have to suffer the consequences. The signs at the Lodi Pos…

More...

Posted 15 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Letter: Surprised by water bill

Until the meters were put in that flat rate was outstanding since you could use all the water you could get through a hose anytime you want…

More...

Posted 17 hours ago by Walter Chang.

article: Letter: La Raza does support illegal im…

"some bloggers here" Kevin, I was referring specifically about a handful of Archconservative/Retrogressive "Christain"…

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists