Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Cynthia Neely It is time to reconsider our involvement in Afghanistan

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Friday, July 16, 2010 10:11 pm | Updated: 6:01 am, Sat Jul 17, 2010.

It is ironic that it took the quixotic chair of the Republican Party to make one of the most realistic assessments of the eight-year American war in Afghanistan.

After blaming President Obama for "choosing" this war, Michael Steele stated: "If he is such a student of history has he not understood that, you know, that's the one thing you don't do is engage in a land war in Afghanistan? All right? Because everyone who's tried, over a thousand years of history has failed."

While he can legitimately complain that Obama has kept us in Afghanistan, he cannot honestly say that "This was a war of Obama's choosing. This is not something the United States has actively prosecuted or wanted to engage in." Those statements are patently untrue.

When the Taliban were hiding Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan after 9/11, the United States went into Afghanistan to attempt to find bin Laden and his al-Qaida operatives to obtain justice for the 2,976 people who were murdered on that day.

Michael Steele has made so many gaffes that there are grumblings in the party to replace him. However, with mid-term elections around the corner, Republicans do not need this distraction, so they just try to deflect his statements and offer mild criticism. Republican Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham have been critical about the latest Afghan remarks, but both fell short of asking for his resignation. They were critical because they, like many Republicans, still support this war and do not want President Obama to set a timeline to withdraw.

Perhaps this latest gaffe and the recent firing of Gen. McCrystal will raise our awareness of what is happening in the war in Afghanistan and may galvanize a movement to rethink our purpose there. While I personally opposed the war in Iraq from Day 1 and wrote letters to our senators and members of Congress explaining my objections, I supported our entry into Afghanistan to search for Osama bin Laden and other al-Qaida terrorists who were being supported and hidden by the Taliban. But we lost bin Laden in Tora Bora and then began to get mired in a long, bitter struggle between competing tribes and warlords, a struggle which mirrors the ones between factions that have occurred in that country for thousands of years.

Leon Panetta, the head of the CIA, recently reported that there are fewer than 100 al-Qaida operatives in Afghanistan. Most, including Osama bin Laden, have apparently fled to Pakistan and other countries, from Somalia to Germany. So now should we invade Germany and Somalia?

For once, Michael Steele had it right when he said that a land war in Afghanistan is doomed to fail. We can look back to recent history when the Afghanistan War took its toll on the Soviet Union. Their long, unsuccessful invasion of Afghanistan was a blow to their standing in the world and was one of the major factors that led to the breakup of the Soviet Union and the subsequent economic chaos that followed.

We have been at war for more than eight years in Afghanistan, longer than we were in Vietnam. Americans should be getting answers to some questions about the prosecution of this war. What is the purpose of the war in Afghanistan? Does our presence in that country really make us safer? Now that bin Laden is no longer in Afghanistan, why are we there? Does it take 100,000 American troops to go after 100 al-Qaida operatives? Since the war will cost $105 billion dollars this fiscal year, is it reasonable to spend over $1 billion for each of the 100 al-Qaida members? Do we even know who our real enemy is in Afghanistan?

On July 7, NATO forces killed five Afghan soldiers, mistaking them for insurgents. Later that week, an Afghan soldier killed three British soldiers and wounded four others. These occurrences are all too common.

In a recent Newsweek article, Jonathan Alter said, "The country simply cannot afford a trillion-dollar commitment to nation building." We have now spent more than $1 trillion dollars on our Iraq and Afghanistan Wars. We are building schools, hospitals and infrastructure there, much of which is soon destroyed after it is completed, if it is completed.

We should spend those dollars to rebuild our own nation. Rebuilding and repairing our own decaying infrastructure could create jobs that would have to stay in this country.

Sadly, we have brought literally millions of American dollars by the truckload to Iraq and Afghanistan. Instead of providing for security and rebuilding those countries, many of those dollars fill up the pockets of corrupt politicians and contractors.

The two wars have cost us dearly in dollars, but even more dramatic is the toll on the lives of Americans. Our troops have had devastating losses — lives lost, limbs missing, not to mention the traumatic stress on troops and families. The costs in dollars and in negative effects on troops are already staggering. They will continue to increase the longer we keep spending $8 billion per month on those wars.

Wars are easy to start, not so easy to end. But there is a time when a realistic assessment of our involvement must be recognized and addressed. And that time is now.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

9 comments:

  • Brian Dockter posted at 8:06 am on Sat, Aug 7, 2010.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2813

    Ms. Neely wrote:


    Wars are easy to start, not so easy to end.

    -As if the U.S. and the international community's intentions are to do everything they can keep this war going. Ms. Neely's ignorance of the history of this area is quite profound.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 7:57 am on Sat, Aug 7, 2010.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2813

    Ms. Neely wrote:


    This is not something the United States has actively prosecuted or wanted to engage in." Those statements are patently untrue.

    -Chuckle,

    Ms. Neely. Are you also saying Alexander the Great was anxious to have to take care of business in Afghanistan? How little you know about the history of conflicts in this area.

     
  • stan taves posted at 10:31 am on Mon, Jul 19, 2010.

    Stan Taves Posts: 302

    ...Maybe Ms Neely should try a little more honesty herself. Although it is true that Afghanistan is not a war of Obama's choosing; it's costly escalation, in lives and treasure, surely is. Do many republicans believe in a long term presence for us in Afghanistan? probably, but they also believe that a presence can be maintained without the costs that Obama is demanding. As for the firing of Gen McCrystal: It seems pretty clear to me that the good General would have lit a bomb under his own rear end just to get away from Obama's unworkable policy. Yes Ms Neely, it is time to "reconsider..."; but maybe we should all start by considering how to render this Presidency impotent.

     
  • Jerry Bransom posted at 4:44 am on Sun, Jul 18, 2010.

    Jerry Bransom Posts: 363

    You bet'cha, Larry!!

     
  • Larry Whitted posted at 11:30 am on Sat, Jul 17, 2010.

    Larry Whitted Posts: 2

    The U.S. government's intention to enter Afghanistan and capture Osama Bin Laden was publicly announced at the time:

    "President George W. Bush vowed that US troops will hunt down terrorists and "smoke them out of their holes" in a long, unrelenting war. He said prime suspect Osama bin Laden will not be able to hide from America's forces." Unfortunately, he was mistaken and Osama Bin Laden was able to hide from America's forces.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/bush-says-us-will-wage-long-and-unrelenting-war-751947.html

     
  • Jerry Bransom posted at 11:28 am on Sat, Jul 17, 2010.

    Jerry Bransom Posts: 363

    Since you posted a link, I decided I would too. There was a hearing in 1998 in the congress (not advertised but available in the congressional record) where middle east policy is most definitely influenced by oil. Simply look at all the references to the pipeline through Afghanistan, influence of Iran and decisions about the Taliban to see the truth of the war in Afghanistan. Only one way to get this pipeline - elect Bush.

    Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you the 48–119 CC 1998 HEARINGS on U.S. INTERESTS IN THE CENTRAL ASIAN REPUBLICS. Given before the subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific. ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS FEBRUARY 12, 1998.

    http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/intlrel/hfa48119.000/hfa48119_0.HTM#0

     
  • Jerry Bransom posted at 11:05 am on Sat, Jul 17, 2010.

    Jerry Bransom Posts: 363

    Larry said "thinking that we could just go in and capture him"? So you are privy to the decisions made at the highest levels of government? My hat's off to you!

     
  • Larry Whitted posted at 9:24 am on Sat, Jul 17, 2010.

    Larry Whitted Posts: 2

    I think many people forget that after the attacks of 9/11/01 the Taliban offered to turn over Osama Bin Laden for trial. The U.S. government turned down the offer, thinking that we could just go in and capture him. There were news article about this negotiation in the newspapers at that time. Here is one: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/bush-rejects-taliban-offer-to-surrender-bin-laden-631436.html

     
  • Jerry Bransom posted at 8:06 am on Sat, Jul 17, 2010.

    Jerry Bransom Posts: 363

    The war cannot end. There is a pipeline (Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline) going in from Turkmenistan to serve Pakistan and India's future growth. The Taliban are and always were the problem. All of the silliness in this letter has little bearing on the ultimate outcome. That outcome will be the construction of the TAP and troops on guard until the oil and gas run out, same as in Iraq.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 4 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: We need to stop meddling, spend…

Oh, Andrew, just stop it! Or, I guess I should be saying that to myself because I continue to respond. 1. I'm not going to watch a video…

More...

Posted 6 hours ago by Ed Walters.

article: Police: Lodi man attacked by bicycle-ri…

Evidently it takes 6-7 young cowards to make a point, hitting a 70 year old man, oh what courage. Perhaps the older man should have stayed…

More...

Posted 7 hours ago by Andrew Liebich.

article: Letter: Advertisement was inappropriate

A violation of Rules #4, #5 & #6 was not the reason cited.[sleeping]

More...

Posted 8 hours ago by Lisa Cross-Robinson.

article: Letter: Where are the compassionate doc…

That's a good question. My father was a doctor from the late 50's to the mid 1980's and he still made an occasional house call before his r…

More...

Posted 9 hours ago by Jerome Kinderman.

article: Letter: Lodi’s post office needs beauti…

Considering the consistent financial losses enjoyed by the USPS and their abysmal service (they actually look like they're working in slow …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists