default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

No glamour when police are required to use deadly force

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, March 8, 2010 12:00 am

Most people recall the incident at the county courthouse involving Detective Eric Bradley a year ago. A defendant stabbed Judge Cinda Fox during a break in the court proceedings.

Eric reacted instantly and, in an effort to save Judge Fox's life, mortally wounded the suspect. By all accounts Eric is a hero.

But what happened to Eric after the chaos in the courtroom settled down? What happens to any officer involved in a critical incident in which someone is seriously injured or killed?

It's absolutely nothing like television or the movies. It's not fun; it's not cool. The officer who pulls the trigger doesn't simply give a sarcastic one or two sentence statement to their boss, then ride off with their partner with a subtle grin on their face.

These life-changing events are extremely emotional for the officers, not to mention the dispatchers who were interacting with them on the radio as the dangerous situation unfolded. Everyone in the organization, from the records clerks manning the front counter to the volunteers shredding papers, gets a sick feeling in the pit of their stomachs as the news that an officer has been involved in a fatal incident races through the building.

I've been involved in a few of these incidents over the years. What happens in the first few minutes after the shooting is seared in the officers' minds for years. Things like what the first arriving supervisors say to them, the looks on the faces of their fellow officers, or the sights and smells of the scene.

Moments after a shooting the Special Investigations Unit was involved in a few years ago, I felt it was important to gently pat each officer on the shoulder or the back and quietly ask them if they were OK. I was trying to reassure them and, in some way, reassure myself.

Their training had kicked in and they were busy giving first aid to the downed suspect, securing the area and looking for witnesses. They took a second to acknowledge me then went back to what they were doing. Other supervisors, officers, and emergency personnel arrived quickly and we relinquished the investigation to them.

Once the situation is stabilized, the officers involved in the incident are driven from the scene by another officer or supervisor. They are taken to a secluded area at the station out of the view of other employees. Supervisors make it a point not to embarrass an officer by taking the weapon used in the shooting from them in public. They are allowed to keep their weapons until they get to the station. Once there, they give their gun to a Department of Justice official for examination at a later date. Their duty weapon is quickly replaced with one from the department armory.

Police officer association officials are notified. Legal representatives arrive along with peer counselors. Chaplains respond just in case the officers need to talk with someone.

Officers find a quiet place to phone loved ones and tell them they are OK. News travels at lightning speed nowadays on the Internet and Twitter. A family member would rather hear from the officer themselves instead of from a friend who saw something on television about a Lodi officer being involved in a shooting. People assume the worst when they find out that way. All they remember from the news account are the phrases "Lodi officer … shooting … no further details at this time."

The officers are supposed to use the next few hours to gather their thoughts prior to being interviewed. Sometimes it takes a couple of hours, sometimes it takes a lot longer than that. They realize that somehow the shooting changed them forever. People look at them differently now. They make eye contact with the other officers who were at the shooting, knowing most civilians, most officers, will not understand what they just went through. That shared experience will bond them for the rest of their careers.

Fellow employees text or call to make sure they are all right. Others peek in the room and ask, "How you doing?" The officers might have a bite to eat or have a soda. Most are not hungry. Depending on the situation they might have had to give a blood sample for later analysis. They are dealing with the post-shooting adrenaline. They have a tough time sitting still. They walk around thinking, "Did that really happen? Was that really me?"

The word "surreal" is overused nowadays, but in these types of situations it's totally appropriate.

The waiting can last two hours or 12 hours. In something of this nature, the officer-involved critical incident protocol is invoked.

The protocol procedure was instituted in 1994 and involves all county agencies, including LPD. The goal is a fair and impartial investigation. Several investigators from the district attorney's office arrive along with evidence technicians from the Department of Justice. The D.A. investigators pair up with LPD detectives to form teams that will interview everyone who was on scene during the incident.

There were more than 50 people in Judge Fox's courtroom at the time of the shooting, so Detective Bradley was not interviewed until late in the evening. The investigations teams interview officers separately. That in itself is unsettling. The interviews are videotaped and recorded. One of your fellow LPD officers is sitting across the table from you asking questions.

Even more disconcerting is when the Department of Justice representative asks for your gun, then slowly counts all of the bullets left in the magazine. You hear the "click, click, click" as they peel each round off of the magazine. They are checking to make sure all the bullets from the officers on the scene are accounted for.

These teams will speak with witnesses, process the scene for evidence, and attend the autopsy. Their investigation can take months and the final product usually involves a very detailed report that takes up several large binders.

The officers finally get to go home and hug their relatives. Each officer deals with it differently. Most handle it positively. Unfortunately, the stress from these events has ended more than one career at our department. The key is the support the organization and the community gives them, from the first supervisors on scene to the counseling sessions to how a citizen treats them when they recognize them in a restaurant.

The effects of a critical incident last much longer than the time it takes to get to next week's episode.

Any comments, questions or advice for Behind the Badge can be e-mailed to Jeanie Biskup at jbiskup@pd.lodi.gov; mailed to Lodi Police Department, 215 W. Elm St., Lodi, CA 95240; or asked by phone at 333-6864.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • posted at 12:08 pm on Fri, Mar 12, 2010.


    I had a very good friend who had a News Stand and liquor store in EurekaCalifornia. One morning a young man walked in looked at a few magazinesAnd went over to the counter. He asked for a half pint of Canadian Club, when my friend turned to get it he pulled out a 45 auto and said give me theMoney. My friend opened the till and the young man pulled the trigger it was pointed right at his head. He said the click was so loud it was almostDeafening!! The young man made a mistake that cost him his life, he forgotto pump a round into the chamber, my friend grabbed his gun from under the counter and shot the young man between the eyes. The splatter was allover the place.. Even though he Had no choice it changed him dramatically and basically ruined him. I left town not long after that and a few yearsLater he passed away.. My dad said he took the sadness to his grave…

  • posted at 5:08 am on Thu, Mar 11, 2010.


    Lt. Piombo:Your column is one of the best written in the LNS. I respectfully submit that some of our reporters should study and emulate your excellence. As to the subject matter, I sincerely support our officers. Each time they leave their homes for the work day or night, they are literally putting their lives on the line for us here in the community. I may not always agree with the politics and personal conflicts that go on within the department, but I definitely respect all plain clothes detectives and those in uniforms at LPD.My gratitude and thanks to all of you.

  • posted at 4:01 am on Tue, Mar 9, 2010.


    I personally think that this was a case of "suicide by cop".

  • posted at 1:24 pm on Mon, Mar 8, 2010.


    Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.

  • posted at 11:44 am on Mon, Mar 8, 2010.


    The Delta is good, but don't we get our water from there? No, I was thinking more about dropping the body in front of a meth house and placing an anonymous call.

  • posted at 11:12 am on Mon, Mar 8, 2010.


    wujek, concerning hiding the body better, there`s a place called the Delta, you could hide an army out there.

  • posted at 9:50 am on Mon, Mar 8, 2010.


    t jefferson:You just have to learn to hide the body better.

  • posted at 9:27 am on Mon, Mar 8, 2010.


    I agree with Lt. Piombo's assessment of what happens after a shooting is traumatic. Now picture the poor homeowner or taxpayer who is put into the same situation and has to use deadly force to defend themselves. Afterward they don't get counciling, a pat on the back from the chief or disability pay. Instead they get arrested and possibly face a criminal charge of homicide, and a civil wrongful death suit from some bottom feeding lawyer. Kind of a messed up system if you ask me.....makes you almost for a second wonder if you really want to protect yourself...oh wait a second who else is going to. So in addition to the actual act don't forget to include the extra after effects when it is a normal taxpayer who has to use deadly force.

  • posted at 4:51 am on Mon, Mar 8, 2010.


    From what Lt. Piombo says, any police officer that discharges his weapon much appear before a review board, and if deadly force is used the officer will live with the fact that he took a life in the performance of his duties. On the other hand any gang member that shoots and kills another person could care less, like water off a ducks back, will reload smoke some meth and get ready for the next battle. This thinking most certainly seperates the humans from the animals.

  • posted at 4:08 am on Mon, Mar 8, 2010.


    I know the feeling first hand and Chris hit the nail on the head. I was involved in a shooting and had to go to the station and wait for the investigators to arrive. This was around 2 AM and the Deputy Chief came in and patted me on the back and asked if I was ok. That was great assurance. An hour or so later my parents called and asked what was going on as they started receiving phone calls asking if they were related to me. This was back in 1968 way before cell phones and twitter. So news travels fast. You would not survive if it wasn't for the support from your brother and sister officers. Thanks Chris for you input into this stressful situation.


Recent Comments

Posted 1 hour ago by Steve Schmidt.

article: Letter: New York City is behind modern …

Mr Arthur, your letter is a perfect distillation of modern conservative American thought.


Posted 2 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: New York City is behind modern …

Has Mr. Arthur been in a bunker for the last 20 years? He would love the Simpson's episode "Homer vs. New York City" He sounds l…


Posted 2 hours ago by Mike Adams.

article: Letter: New York City is behind modern …

Kevin: You just can't win, especially with allies like this.... Still fighting the cold war, 20 years after it's over... We may not agree…


Posted 10 hours ago by Ron Werner.

article: Tule Lake exhibit weaves story with art…

The Manzanar Japanese relocation historical site is just over the mountains near Bishop. It has an excellent visitor center and museum. It …


Posted 11 hours ago by Christina Welch.

article: Letter: Voters should focus on a new di…

After finding the source of your quote, I read the article. It was very good, praised proportional representation in many ways and said, &…



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists