Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Behind the Badge Setting the record straight on asset forfeiture laws

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, November 7, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 7:13 am, Wed Nov 9, 2011.

There seems to be numerous misunderstandings and urban legends regarding law enforcement’s use of our state and federal asset forfeiture laws.

Asset forfeiture laws were designed to attack drug dealers financially. The intent was that drug dealers should not be allowed to keep monies made while selling illegal drugs.

The laws were also designed for the drug dealers to forfeit property such as cars or homes purchased with drug money. These laws have evolved over the years to include what is called “criminal profiteering,” meaning those that profit from crimes such as embezzlement, forgery, bribery, extortion, money laundering, etc., face a seizure of their profits.  

There seems to be a misconception that law enforcement as a whole seizes money, cars, homes, etc., and that we get to keep the money or profits from sale to supplement our budgets or that we get to use things such as seized vehicles for our own benefit. This is not necessarily the case.

The Lodi Police Department maintains both a state and federal asset forfeiture program. This requires detailed accounting, extensive ongoing training, and cooperation with our local and federal prosecuting agencies.

As part of Lodi PD’s program, asset forfeiture investigators receive initial training as well as yearly updates through the California District Attorney’s Association and California commission on Police Officer Standards and Training. We work closely with both the San Joaquin county District Attorney’s office and the U.S. Attorney’s office and are required to keep specific accounting records of monies or property seized.

In order to seize vehicles or real property, the suspect must be in possession of a minimum amount of specific controlled substances possessed for sales. This places the burden on law enforcement to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the suspect possessed the controlled substances with the intent of sales. If we along with the district attorney’s office are unable to prove the sales of a controlled substance, we must return the suspect’s money and/or property, ensuring that it has not lost value. The police department is not allowed to use the seized property, and it must be sold. 

What makes these investigations unique is that they are civil in nature and prosecuted separately from the criminal case. Upon securing a judgment, the money is divided between several entities by statute.

Sixty-five percent goes to the agency initiating the seizure. Fifteen percent of that total must be used specifically for gang and drug prevention.  Twenty-four percent goes to the State of California General Fund. Ten percent goes to the prosecuting District Attorney’s office. One percent goes to the California District Attorney’s Association to pay for ongoing law enforcement training.

While these funds assist law enforcement in their criminal investigations, they are not designed to supplement existing budgets. Using these monies is strictly controlled by state statute to prevent misuse. That being said, Asset Forfeiture remains a valuable tool for law enforcement to use to combat illicit drug sales in our community.

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

2 comments:

  • Mike Magnus posted at 5:34 am on Sun, Nov 13, 2011.

    mmagnus Posts: 1

    Not sure I've ever seen someone "set the record straight" by reaffirming every negative perception the public held in the first place.... Interesting approach.

    He lays out the "misconception" that police can take your money and property, sell it and keep the profits. Then says that's "not necessarily true" then uses the rest of the article explaining how it is exactly true.

    Wonderful....

     
  • Steve White posted at 7:56 am on Sat, Nov 12, 2011.

    In the know Posts: 1

    What urban legend did this article refute? The bottom line is, when the cops seize stuff, they get to keep most of it's value. And he's misrepresented or omitted the fact that forfeiture hearings have far fewer protections than criminal trials, and above all, that they violate the Bill of Rights as it was instituted.

    Basically, while denying it, this cop admits all the negatives people believe about forfeiture laws are true.

     

Recent Comments

Posted 7 hours ago by jeffreyrinek.

article: San Joaquin County supervisors approve …

Mr. Chang, from your latest comment concerning out of county comments I presume you are referring to me, at the least. Thank you for partic…

More...

Posted 7 hours ago by Frank Gayaldo.

article: San Joaquin County supervisors approve …

My passion is promoting our local economy. When the sheriff does things like waste $9 million dollars on jail design plans, that has a dire…

More...

Posted 8 hours ago by Eric Barrow.

article: Letter: Pastor Frank Nolton forgets abo…

Left wing political propaganda nonsense? I thought you weren't caught up in the left right paradigm.

More...

Posted 8 hours ago by nth degree wise.

article: Letter: Pastor Frank Nolton forgets abo…

Now who is promoting political (right wing) propaganda nonsense? That a sign on a school building (Gun-Free School Zone) is the cause of sc…

More...

Posted 8 hours ago by Ron Werner.

article: Chris Piombo: Life can be hard for a Do…

The Dodgers, just like the federal government. They think that if you throw enough money at something you can buy what you want. With the …

More...

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 28

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists