default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

San Joaquin County supervisors will decide if farmers pay 10 percent more taxes

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Bruce Blodgett, San Joaquin County Farm Bureau’s executive director

Posted: Friday, November 19, 2010 12:00 am | Updated: 9:19 am, Fri Nov 19, 2010.

Thanks to a state program, farmers enrolled in the Williamson Act may end up paying 10 percent more in property tax. The San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors will decide, probably on Dec. 7, whether to participate in the state program that changes the Williamson Act.

Supervisors will discuss the issue at Tuesday's meeting. They may end up choosing to not participate in the program, according to county staff analyst Phonxay Keokham.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?



You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?



Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Ken Rowe posted at 2:06 pm on Fri, Nov 19, 2010.

    Ken Rowe Posts: 1

    Actually this isn't a 10% tax. Williamson Act property owners would only get 90% of the benefit they nomally would get under contract. This all came about because some of the southern counties were considering getting rid of the Williamson Act and it was thought that 90% of the benefit was better that 0%.

  • Doug Chaney posted at 8:38 am on Fri, Nov 19, 2010.

    Doug Chaney Posts: 1232

    That "food" seems to be dwindling into winegrapes. Tax those who choose to continue to flood the SJ valley with their cheap winegrapes 25% and a "pumping tax" of another 25% and subsidize those who continue to grow life sustaining crops that have been the backbone of agriculture in the central valley forever. Don't forget, old timers, many of you swore that when cotton was gone agriculture would shrivel?

  • Derek Waggoner posted at 4:26 am on Fri, Nov 19, 2010.

    Derek Waggoner Posts: 4

    Here we go again. Though I am not a farmer, I am against urbanization and loss of farmland. Gee, where is our food going to come from? In any event, once again it should not read "County Supes decide if farmers should pay 10% more taxes" (which would be added to our food cost anyway), it should be County Supes need to cut 10% more in spending. Faithfully written from an employee of the great State of California.



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists