Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Case against Lodi teacher dismissed

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 11:40 am, Tue Jan 17, 2012.

Charges against the Lodi Middle School teacher who was placed under citizen's arrest by an administrator in December were dropped.

Jon Lapachet no longer faces an investigation by the District Attorney's office, according to Jeff Johnston, president of the Lodi Education Association. The court declined to follow up on battery allegations against Lapachet by vice principal Lurdes Rosales, with instructions not to resubmit the charges.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

7 comments:

  • Rocky Avitia posted at 12:58 pm on Wed, Jan 25, 2012.

    Rocky Avitia Posts: 20

    I Remember Mr. Lapachet. He was a good man. Hopefully he's consulted a lawyer.

     
  • Jackson Scott posted at 5:33 pm on Wed, Jan 18, 2012.

    Jackson Scott Posts: 386

    What is more interesting is that Cheryl, errrr, Joanne posted on this story but not on today's story which basically backs up my post from last night. Believe me, there is much more to this story.

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 11:35 am on Wed, Jan 18, 2012.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Interesting comments, Mr. Scott. As the spouse of a former administrator of a MS for 15 years in a district that was much tougher than LUSD, I heard just about every night about the teachers who wanted to dictate punishments for unruly students.

    Unfortunately, administrators are bound by the CA Education Code, and what teachers want and what is legal are usually two different things. There was plenty of bullying from teachers who demanded certain things for certain students.

    Believe me, my husband is not a soft-touch - he is ex-military and has no soft spot for kids who are disruptive, and less for parents who coddle their kids and don't want to support teachers and administrators. But there is a code that must be complied with.

    As a teacher, he dealt with kids directly and rarely sent them to the administration. That's called "classroom management," a skill that many teachers lack and then blame admin for not supporting them.

     
  • Jackson Scott posted at 10:03 pm on Tue, Jan 17, 2012.

    Jackson Scott Posts: 386

    Great news for Mr. Lapachet. It is too bad that Ms. Rosales was compelled to do such a legal & public maneuver. And lets get this straight, this was planned as she waited overnight to do this, and consulted with her Principal.

    As Jeff Johnson's comments indicate, the teachers union does not favor the Principal or the VP. Read as: LMS Teachers. And LMS is one of the most pro-union schools in the district.

    The problem exists between not only Rosales & Lapachet, but between the Admin & the PE Staff. The 4 PE teachers are old school type of people, what do you expect they're all ex-jocks and highly competitive. The Admin lives in a daydream world filled with rainbows & unicorns. The PE teachers expect that when rules are broken that the stated consequences are to be given to the rule breaker. That is not the case at LMS. The Admin talks & talks & talks, and then gives the students a tiny wrist slap when the break a rule. For ALL of the teachers it is very frustrating. But I understand that the PE staff has vocalized their displeasure with the lack of punishment enforcement.

     
  • Alex Kennedy posted at 6:04 pm on Tue, Jan 17, 2012.

    Alex Posts: 215

    No duh case dismissed. A cop just wrote an editorial and stated that parolees are no longer being accepted into jails if they only commit a parole violation. We, as in every citizen and alien, cannot afford this blatant waste of resources. How could the administration have believed this was remotely appropriate? To involve LPD and eventually the courts with this seemingly internal matter shows a horrible lack of judgement which was exacerbated by their desire to talk to the press and terrible attempt at a Rosa Parks parallel that followed. And to think not one of them told the other that it may not be the best idea. The teacher could have been the worst teacher/coworker but he comes off as the rational coherent victim. I would hate to have either one of those drama queens as my boss. They should go and quickly or he should consider legal action. I mean who would want to work for people who arrest you willy-nilly?

     
  • posted at 10:42 am on Tue, Jan 17, 2012.

    Posts:

    This will cost the disrtict some major damage control money. Prepare to be sued. They can all thank this admin for talking to the paper.

     
  • posted at 10:41 am on Tue, Jan 17, 2012.

    Posts:

    This will cost the district some major cash for damage control. Lapachet will clean up for his name being slandered in the press. This admin will (should) get the boot.

     
Readers Choice Awards 2014

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists