default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Christmas comes to Galt early this year

State's high court rules city is entitled to funds withheld by Sac County

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Friday, November 23, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:19 am, Fri Nov 23, 2012.

The city of Galt will receive $144,000 after the California Supreme Court ordered Sacramento County to pay its cities money it improperly withheld.

Counties collect property tax revenue and then distribute shares to cities and schools after taking out administrative fees for doing so.

But in an unanimous decision handed down Monday, the state's top court decided Sacramento County, like others in California, improperly charged administrative fees on education money that is exempt from such fees under state law.

Now they must pay up. Statewide, the ruling means a difference of about $40 million a year for cities, according to the League of California Cities.

"That's good for us," City Manager Jason Behrmann said. "I feel good about it. I'm glad it worked out."

Galt had been waiting for the ruling, and on Monday will formally be seeking a refund from the county, according to Behrmann.

He said Sacramento County has held the cities' money in an escrow account. In Galt, it will go into the general fund to be used for public safety, community development and administration personnel costs.

Last year, several cities opted to settle with Sacramento County and split the amounts being challenged. Folsom, for example, split its $700,000 in question, Behrmann said. They won't be getting the full fees back retroactively.

Galt, instead, decided to file a lawsuit against Sacramento County to collect all of its administrative fees dating back to 2006.

"We felt it was not the right thing to do," Behrmann said of the county's proposed settlement. "We didn't want to give the county money that wasn't theirs."

It is not clear whether Lodi was part of the Supreme Court lawsuit, but its property tax administrative fees would likely be two to three times the amount of Galt's, according to Behrmann.

The ruling will put an additional $30,000 annually back into Galt coffers since Sacramento County can no longer collect the fee in question.

Contact reporter Jennifer Bonnett at jenniferb@lodinews.com.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.


Popular Stories



Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists