Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Rancho Seco moving nuclear fuel rods to dry storage

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, June 6, 2000 10:00 pm | Updated: 7:22 am, Tue Dec 4, 2012.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has its eyes on the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, which plans to transfer 464,000 gallons of fuel stored in a pool at Rancho Seco in August to a dry storage area less than a quarter-mile away.

Moving the spent fuel into dry storage is a temporary move as SMUD waits for authorization to move the nuclear fuel to a permanent storage site. That won’t happen until about 2013, said Steve Redeker, who is in charge of decommissioning Rancho Seco, located on Highway 104 about 15 miles northeast of Galt.

U.S. Department of Energy officials say they hope to transport the nuclear fuel to Yucca Mountain, Nev., an isolated area about 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas. However, the federal government’s ability to send its nuclear waste to Yucca Mountain is on hold because of environmental concerns in Nevada.

SMUD and other agencies shouldn’t have started using nuclear power without already having a location to deposit the fuel once the plants are decommissioned, said Karen Pella, who lives on two acres less than a mile from Rancho Seco.

Anticipating community interest for the upcoming transfer of the 493 fuel rods from liquid storage to dry storage, SMUD officials conducted a tour on Saturday for 125 local residents, most of them from Herald. The regulatory commission will also conduct a community meeting June 20 in Galt.

Pella, who toured the plant Saturday, said she is confident in SMUD’s ability to move the nuclear fuel safely despite her opposition to nuclear power.

“I heard that dry storage is a lot safer than wet storage,” said Pella’s neighbor, Shirley Grennell, who has lived in Rancho Seco’s back yard for 32 years.

The main safety risk from a nuclear power plant, Redeker said, is melting fuel. However, the fuel at Rancho Seco isn’t hot enough to melt, he said. The fuel isn’t any hotter than six 100-watt light bulbs, he said.

Rancho Seco was built for $350 million in 1970 because of the United States’ concern about its dependence on foreign oil and because of the need to find an alternative to fossil fuel plants produced by coal and oil, Dennis Gardiner, a decommissioning team leader for SMUD, said in a January interview.

In an advisory ballot measure in June 1989, Sacramento County voters asked SMUD to shut down the plant, and the district’s board of directors immediately voted to shut it down.

“If it had been operating, I wouldn’t have purchased this property,” said Pella, who moved to the area a year ago from Portland, Ore. “Chernobyl comes to mind. Three Mile Island comes to mind.”

The 1979 Three Mile Island accident in central Pennsylvania was reported to be the worst nuclear accident in the United States. No one was injured, however.

However, 30 people were reported killed in the 1986 accident in Chernobyl, Russia.

It’s been 11 years since Rancho Seco was closed as the supplier of Sacramento County’s electricity, but the plant has yet to be decommissioned. It’s a long, tedious process.

Pella said she doesn’t expect any catastrophes in moving the nuclear fuel to dry storage because earthquakes aren’t common in the Sacramento Valley.

“Even when it was running (as a nuclear power plant), it never really bothered us,” Grennell said.

The Nuclear Energy Commission’s community meeting on the decommissioning of Rancho Seco is scheduled for 7 p.m. June 20 at the Chabolla Community Center, 630 Chabolla Ave., Galt.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 100

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists