Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

City of Lodi faces steep pension increases

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, May 14, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 6:07 am, Mon May 16, 2011.

For the first time in Lodi's history, the city is asking all of its employees to pay into their pensions to help offset steep increases in retirement costs.

Earlier this month, Lodi's top managers agreed to pay 7 percent of their pension costs, which is the maximum allowed by the state.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

27 comments:

  • roy bitz posted at 8:23 am on Tue, May 17, 2011.

    roy bitz Posts: 499

    In today's paper Mr. Bartlam tells us Lodi police were "gifted" a 20% increase in 2008. This is crazy!

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 8:37 pm on Mon, May 16, 2011.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    mike... I understand your post and you made fair points... however, my point is that there are farmers, self employed, roofers, mom and pop store owners, insurance employees, farm workers, priests, fisherman, construction workers, car repair workers, child care providers, private school teachers, private sector janitors, Walmart employees, Kmart employee, Starbucks employees, Dillards employees, title company employees, clerks, gas station attendants, accountant, lawyers, doctors and all sorts of other employees that are all treated like second class people with substandard retirement plans. None have defined benefit retirement plans like teachers and government employees who have been exempted from social security... why are all these people excluded from what is obviously a better plan... why are teachers and government employees treated as a higher class and more deserving? Its why I get so disgusted when I hear these people complain about their situation...there is nothing to complain about compared to everyone else.

     
  • Mike Adams posted at 6:38 pm on Mon, May 16, 2011.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1380

    Darrell, I don't know why teachers get to participate in an additional retirement plan, but most do. It's one of those "we didn't start this, but we'll take part in it". I think it came about in the early-mid 80's for some perceived problem.

    Back in the day (before my day), teachers weren't paid as much as they are today. They couldn't collectively bargain (1970's), they didn't get health or dental plans.
    To be honest, it wasn't the best job to have, at least if you wanted to live moderately.
    Thankfully, teacher unions evolved as legislation allowed teachers to collectively bargain and as a result (over 30-40 years) it has become a decent wage with decent benefits. Those things are eroding now and we know it.

     
  • Doug Chaney posted at 12:41 pm on Mon, May 16, 2011.

    Doug Chaney Posts: 1232

    Darrell, you knew that, too? LOL

     
  • Charles Nelson posted at 9:20 am on Mon, May 16, 2011.

    Charles Nelson Posts: 259

    Don't worry, the City of Lodi has a fresh new source of income from its citizens. Metered water.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 9:19 am on Mon, May 16, 2011.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    That is easy Josh... as much as they can and more than they have... smile

     
  • Josh Morgan posted at 8:10 am on Mon, May 16, 2011.

    Josh Morgan Posts: 532

    Now Doug, how would you know how much a drunken sailor spends at a brothel?

     
  • Doug Chaney posted at 8:53 pm on Sun, May 15, 2011.

    Doug Chaney Posts: 1232

    Mr. Scott, you sound like a council parrot. Blame it on Dixon Flynn and Allan Vallow? It's the city council, and those 5 votes only, that enact the legislation that rewards them with their own salary and benefit package containing any amount and written in the legalese they choose to benefit themslevesIf you look at the current council, you can see two present members that were assumed to be instrumental in the financial destruction of Lodi Electric and the city of Lodi, still spending like drunken sailors in a brothel.

     
  • Doug Chaney posted at 8:44 pm on Sun, May 15, 2011.

    Doug Chaney Posts: 1232

    Josh and Jackson, if you don't think there are and always have been, backdoor deals that go on in Lodi and any other city or burg in this country, you are either one of those wheeler dealers in denial, or very, very naive.

     
  • Jackson Scott posted at 6:44 pm on Sun, May 15, 2011.

    Jackson Scott Posts: 386

    One of my dinner partners & I last night were discussing this article. She brought up a keen point: It was City Manager Dixon Flynn who was in charge during the early 2000's. We guessed he juiced up his pension during this time.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 10:42 am on Sun, May 15, 2011.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Joanne Bobin posted at 10:09...A company I consulted for "hired" a couple of independent contractors, allowed them to receive medical coverage under their group plan, then terminated the employee-employer relationship a month later. The IC's continued coverage under COBRA, entirely paid for by the company. Just an example of "creative" ways to give coverage...

    I agree... creative... but... if the insurance company found out that what you described actually happened, they could rescind coverage and sue for any claims paid out. The fact that they put them on COBRA in my mind indicates more evidence that what they did was fraud ( they were aware that an employer/employee relationship was needed for eligibility requirements.... can you imagine a million dollar claim denied.... a lawyers dream case... also, if I was a terminated employee from that same employer...who had to pay for my COBRA, I would sue the employer to pay for mine under discrimination basis. Risky behavior by the employer... I would have never advised my client to do what was done.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 10:21 am on Sun, May 15, 2011.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    It surprises that anyone thinks it is appropriate or fair that such a large portion of our society deserves a defined benefit plan while everybody else has a far less superior plan in social security... In addition, it amazes me that STRS's participants are eligible for 403B tax deferred benefits where up to 20,000 can be sheltered from taxes where private sector employees cannot. In my view, all defined benefit plans are far better than anything private sector can get... maybe the debate should be... why are government employees and teachers more deserving and more imortant ? Why do they get so much more? Why are they so privileged?
    I would trade my social security for a defined benefit plan in a heart beat...

     
  • Joanne Bobin posted at 10:09 am on Sun, May 15, 2011.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    Mr. Baumbach at 10:12AM 5/14: Interesting comments - I know your profession compels you to be knowledgeable about these issues, but what about the "go-arounds?"

    A company I consulted for "hired" a couple of independent contractors, allowed them to receive medical coverage under their group plan, then terminated the employee-employer relationship a month later. The IC's continued coverage under COBRA, entirely paid for by the company. Just an example of "creative" ways to give coverage.

     
  • roy bitz posted at 9:39 am on Sun, May 15, 2011.

    roy bitz Posts: 499

    It surprises me the pension program for police and firemen is 50% better than the pension program for other city employees.
    It also surprises me that "part time/elected/volunteers" ( city council members ) receive pension and healthcare benefits---while part-time employees do not.
    Council members have an opportunity "walk their talk"--they could choose to stop receiving city paid pension and healthcare benefits. As long as they continue to accept these "UNEARNED goodies they are part of the problem.

     
  • Mike Adams posted at 8:05 am on Sun, May 15, 2011.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1380

    Teachers pay into STRS...8% of gross monthly. The school district kicks in a
    matching amount + some other factor..8.25%(this may sunset this year). I suppose
    that a school district could negotiate paying the teachers' portion if they wanted, in
    which case a district's contribution would be anywhere up to 16.25%, with teachers
    paying nothing.

    Can someone, who actually knows how the city pension participation plan works and not just some sort of psuedo expert who just types opinion, tell me:
    1. Is the city (or cities or any public entity) paying the entire contribution to CalPers
    so that some groups of employees pay nothing into their own retirement?

    2. If #1 is true, and aside from collective bargaining, why are some groups recieving
    pensions at higher rates. It was my understanding that everyone (inCalPers) was
    getting 3 @ 50 (%per years worked at age 50, assuming they have been vested)?

    Again, I would prefer someone who actually knows the answer and not just speculation on someone's part to respond to this. There is a considerable amount of misinformation out here, some out of deception, some just plain ignorance.

     
  • Josh Morgan posted at 6:17 pm on Sat, May 14, 2011.

    Josh Morgan Posts: 532

    Manuel..........it was a compound sentence.

     
  • Jackson Scott posted at 5:04 pm on Sat, May 14, 2011.

    Jackson Scott Posts: 386

    Doug, Josh's 3:11pm post is 110% correct. I agree with some of what you say, but then you spew your conspiracy theories of GOB's, backroom deals, blah blah blah.

    Doug, I think Rad's "poor" folks was something like "red headed stepchild" at the local level. Meaning the local level gets what's left of the pie, usually not much. You naturally fly off the handle and go straight into another rant about Rad's salary.

    As for the content of the article, I'm so sick of my City of Lodi employee friends complaining. Go get a job in the real world, then see what you have to pay for medical, and what you have to contribute to a 401k. This is why your $60K goes so much farther then your neighbors $60K per year.

    Why did the city contributions shoot up years ago? Because they had to, due to poor performance by the CalPers investments as I recall. This in NOT just a Lodi problem, this is an every city in the state of Calif problem.

    If you think our city is a mess, just look at Stockton and see what true disfunction looks like.

     
  • Doug Chaney posted at 4:17 pm on Sat, May 14, 2011.

    Doug Chaney Posts: 1232

    Josh, look up good ol' boys on Wiki? I think it pertains to any issue or good old boy that controls Lodi. They are the same good old boys that have run Lodi since its beginning and enacted each and every law, rule and ordinance to benefit themselves and their peers, many of them relatives, that not only have the retirement systyem on the verge of bankruptcy, so they say, and who have gotten filthy rich staacking the deck by being one of those 3 out of 5 council reps who have the ability to pass and control issues like nice fat retirement checks, grandiose salaries, and allow themselves to spend Lodi taxpayers into oblivion due to being very ignorant about spending other (taxpayers) money on a whim.

     
  • Manuel Martinez posted at 3:56 pm on Sat, May 14, 2011.

    Manuel Martinez Posts: 641

    Josh, can you explain how references to "the good ol' boys" are indicative of racism?

     
  • Josh Morgan posted at 3:11 pm on Sat, May 14, 2011.

    Josh Morgan Posts: 532

    Doug.....just some friendly advice. Keep your remarks to the subject at hand. You really have some good opinions and then your credibility goes out the window when you start making your racist remarks and claims that the City is run by the "good ol boyz". Your predictions of arrests, indictments, Grand Jury investigations, etal are just undermining your opinions.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 10:12 am on Sat, May 14, 2011.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Doug... if you really want to pursue investigating if the CC can have health care benefits through the city, you need to get a copy of the contract between the insurance carrier and the city. In it are provisions that dictate eligibility. I contacted Blue Shield and asked if I could offer health insurance to a municipality including their board members... they replied only if the board members meet eligibility requirements of 30 hours per week time worked.
    There normally needs to be a employer/employee relationship and a minimum of 30 hours paid income registered on the DE-6 now a DE-9... It is not likely board members qualify by contract just has a board member of a C corporation is not eligible unless verification of full time employee status is submitted to the insurance carrier. If I were a part time employee of the city of Lodi, I would request to view a copy of the contract... there “could be” (might be) grounds to sue for benefits based on discrimination. I think it would be interesting to see this contract... if they have a legitimate way to do what they are doing, I would love to know what that contractual provision is so I could apply it to other organizations that would want to do the same thing. Discrimination has legal teeth.

     
  • Doug Chaney posted at 9:28 am on Sat, May 14, 2011.

    Doug Chaney Posts: 1232

    And city manager Mr. Bartlam makes the statement: Even if the city creates a two-tier system and employees pay their full share, Bartlam has concerns that in the future the city could still come up short.
    "Like so many things, us poor people at the local level are really going to be dependent on the state legislature to change the law," he said. HUH? Us poor people? For someone who corners around $200,000 including seen and unseen perks, that's quite a statement. Poor?
    And after listening to council meetings and researching Lodi corruption on the internet, HighBeam research, and all local papers and links, listening to these self serving blowhards and their self promoting local newspaper who paints them as those they really aren't, I tend to believe the statement by Mr. Doell, who says PERS funds should have been put away in good times and not squandered on projects like the unneeded and unwanted water treatment plant and investment in the NCPA's greenhouse gas spewing gas fired co-gen plant, the Lodi Energy Center, generating gigantic profits for the NCPA and a risky future investment for Lodi with the green energy mandates just around the corner, and the mismanagement of funds in the early 2000's, including the power spot electricity buy by Hansen and the NCPA which nearly bankrupted LEUD and Lodi. These city council reps are just ordinary citizens like you and I and don't have any ideas outside of their own self interests and those of the developers and money families here in this little caucasian dominated town. Just look at the eastside oof Lodi, the strip malls, the dilapidated and rundown buildings all over town, the pecking orders for all these societal little groups and you can see why Lodi is not so livable and lovable anymore for anyone but the wealthy, well-connected, wine drinkers and growers society, and good old boys. Long live Lodi!

     
  • Doug Chaney posted at 9:02 am on Sat, May 14, 2011.

    Doug Chaney Posts: 1232

    Larry Hansen, what is your actual pension amount from LPD and other city pension plans, if any? And how much are those grandiose healthcare plans costing Lodi taxpayers that are provided to city of Lodi employees, some who have their own plan, either private or coverage by another employer oor spouse, who then can put that $13,000 or so for city paid healthcare into their own pockets? Not only does pension need to be reformed, but also the co-pays on healthcare and double-ddipping by those who take the cash payment. And, ex-police chief Hansen, you were the one of the principals who initiated the retire at 50 system that is now breaking coties and little towns like Lodi all across the country when you were with LPD.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 7:47 am on Sat, May 14, 2011.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    "We desperately need to provide an education effort to our employees so they understand with the rising cost of our pension program …

    I think if they want a real education of the true problem, they should print off “JOHN RING'S” post and make it mandatory for each employee to read and memorize his words. John's thoughts hits the nail on the head as to the reality of the situation. Just to add to his thoughts, Ive posted this paragraph from the paper which dispels the notion that city leaders created the problem by mismanaging money Its not only a Lodi problem.

    By: Examiner Staff Writer 08/24/10 3:00 AM
    The Washington Examiner Follow Us @dcexaminer
    Unfunded public pension liabilities, which a Pew Center on the States report calculates is now as high as $1 trillion nationwide, threaten to bankrupt states that fail to address this ticking fiscal time bomb. But in California, which has an unimaginable $500 billion public pension problem and became the object of national ridicule for outrageous pension abuses in Bell, state lawmakers still couldn’t bring themselves to pass legislation preventing highly paid government employees from using unused vacation and sick days accumulated during their last year on the job to pad their life-long pensions.

     
  • John Ring posted at 6:48 am on Sat, May 14, 2011.

    John Ring Posts: 34

    I see where I made a mistake in my post. I meant "thats why the private sector went to a defined CONTRIBUTION system" not benefit system.

     
  • John Ring posted at 6:45 am on Sat, May 14, 2011.

    John Ring Posts: 34

    This is is a simple math problem. The bill for the benefits that have been negotiated by public unions(and agreed to by politicians) all over the country is now coming due. I as a tax payer was not part of the negotiation. Being a private sector empolyee I had no bargaining power in the negotiation but now I am being asked to foot the bill as a taxpayer. It is pretty clear that the politicians are bought and paid for by the unions which helped contribute to the problem we now face. The long term solution will be to shift all these benefits over to a defined contribution mechanism versus a defined benefit system. We can argue and complain all we want about mismanagement of the funds after the fact but that doesn't solve the problem. That's why the private sector went to a defined benefit system years ago. The unions are starting to get it but there really is no choice as the money will be running out with the current system. What we see in concessions by the unions is a good start in recognizing the problem. Hopefully here in Lodi they will restructure the system instead of just asking the taxpayer to pay more to cover the cost.

     
  • Josh Morgan posted at 6:26 am on Sat, May 14, 2011.

    Josh Morgan Posts: 532

    "Blandford and Doell both said the public safety unions are frustrated with the situation because they believe that officials mismanaged funds in the early 2000s, and that is why the city is struggling now.

    According to the chart in the newspapers it was the early 2000's that these pension contributions started to sky rocket. Can anyone direct me to the website that would have the Council members names and who City management was in the early 2000's. The only mismanaged funds I see are the huge increase in pension contributions by the City.

     
Readers Choice Awards 2014

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists