Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Lodi court to close March 4; services to be transferred to Stockton

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

13 comments:

  • Elise Middlecamp posted at 12:05 pm on Sat, Jan 5, 2013.

    Elise Middlecamp Posts: 20

    Interesting perspective. I'm not sure what budget cuts have to do with the justice system though. If the justice system is not supporting itself by the legal and permitting fees along with the fines and other sources of revenue then those pricing schedules need to be adjusted to support the court. It makes zero sense to need to subsidize the court with a majority of outside tax dollars.

    Based on your comment it makes me think that everyone of my parents generation and older just don't know how to run a government.

    You do know what you're talking about, but you're only incriminating your generation (if you are indeed older than mid forties) for being unable to operate the government of the people in a way that honors future generations.

     
  • Teresa Johnson posted at 10:38 pm on Fri, Jan 4, 2013.

    lodigrl Posts: 5

    Although sad this should have happened last year. Every court in California is feeling the cuts and some have already made the sacrifice of shutting courts to save money. Although an inconvenience for some there are more services offered at the main courthouse that was not offered here. And yes with trials not just LPD, but CHP, stockton and Sheriff officers/deputies have to attend th and wait to be called not to mentioned. The investigating officer who sit in on the entire trial. That comes with gthe job and they know it. Since we like to find people to blame blame the aoc for mismanaging money for the courts and blame the courts who didn't realize being efficient means running your court I'm the black not the red and them go to the state for a bail.out. so sorry but the rose colored glasses should have come off two years ago. Oh and before you say I do not know what I am talking about guess again.

     
  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 10:38 am on Fri, Jan 4, 2013.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2255

    This isn't about "smaller government," it's about having a necessary part of our city's services located in OUR city. Now since we've already got the court-rooms in place, the savings would be for heating/cooling them and the support staff to keep them operating. But rest assured Stockton will be expecting a rather tidy sum for sponsoring our court-related operations in their not-so-fair city.

    With the cost of gasoline still high and the wear and tear on police vehicles just to go back and forth (as Ms. Middleton outlines below), how much would the City actually save? Or is this just a knee-j-e-r-k reaction by one judge? After all, until this article I hadn't heard one word about closing down the court-house in favor of moving to Stockton. Is this a unilateral decision by Judge Warner? And why doesn't he have the figures to support this (his) decision? On what basis was it made then?

     
  • Josh Morgan posted at 9:54 am on Fri, Jan 4, 2013.

    Josh Morgan Posts: 529

    Acquiring property through eminent domain does not mean the City would get the property free. Many times the property owner prefers eminent domain because they actually get a higher price for their property plus add tax breaks. Be careful what you wish for.

     
  • Doug Chaney posted at 9:33 am on Fri, Jan 4, 2013.

    advocate Posts: 499

    Does the city of Lodi really need a law enforcement officer just to patrol the few parks in Lodi that are all no further that two or so miles apart? Isn't this just overkill to protect the affluent neighborhoods that contain nearly all of the parks? There are three members of this city council who have no vision or care whatsover what happens to Eastside, CA 95240, now only a dream and plan on buying the decrepit, abandoned car lot properties from Geweke for their new and much needed fire station. I certainly hope if that deal in the works happens that the price is in line with what that blighted property is worth and not some exaggerated amount way out of line not appropriate to today's still struggling economy. I'd suggest the city attorney consider eminent domain and just get the property free.

     
  • Jerry Bransom posted at 9:26 am on Fri, Jan 4, 2013.

    Jerry Bransom Posts: 363

    And all of you hypocrites tell me just what is wrong with smaller government? You cannot have your cake and eat it too. Or maybe you really are no different than the liberals you demonize. Stay out of trouble if you don't like it!

     
  • Doug Chaney posted at 9:22 am on Fri, Jan 4, 2013.

    advocate Posts: 499

    Those empty courthouses and buildings could be used for city departments and some of those spaces the city is leasing at ridiculous rents/leases to house city employees from various departments would amount to tremendous savings to the city. This would consolidate city employees nearer to city hall. It would be an ideal place for the DLBP, Wine & Visitors center, or any entity that is funded by the city of Lodi.

     
  • Doug Chaney posted at 9:15 am on Fri, Jan 4, 2013.

    advocate Posts: 499

    Perhaps the city of Lodi and LPD, along with the parks and recreation department could reconsider hiring that police officer just to patrol the parks and assign him/her to the task of transporting prisoners from Lodi to Stockton. With one supervisory position for every four police officers, maybe one of those "desk sergeants" could also be assigned to that duty.

     
  • Elise Middlecamp posted at 9:45 pm on Thu, Jan 3, 2013.

    Elise Middlecamp Posts: 20

    I don't know the numbers. I was thinking that we all go there maybe once every 3 years for something. Which is something like 19,000 trips per year, or about 70-75 per working day. I could be way off, maybe double I don't know.

    That's approximately 600,000 miles of extra driving Lodi residents will need to do annually. That is about $100,000 in fuel. $6000 in oil changes. $4000 in tires. The associated waste. This isn't counting police costs, which we pay for as well.

    I wonder how much this move is saving annually. In either case, Stockton or Lodi, billable hours for the service should be about the same. The thing that comes to my mind is that Stockton is just larger so they can do it for less money per case from sheer volume efficiency.

    This all doesn't sit well really, especially with respect to decisions that will be made in the coming 20 years, Lodi has had a court for decades. Downtown is looking really good. These aren't that hard of times for a functioning city.

     
  • Ed Walters posted at 7:10 pm on Thu, Jan 3, 2013.

    the old dog Posts: 352

    Makes one wonder what will happen to the empty court houses. Mr. Kinderman expressed good points as to why the city of Lodi should have its own justice system. If, for any reason a Lodi police officer doesn`t appear in Stockton, the person that must appear in court, walks. If a trial is needed, that officer might spend a week or more waiting to testify. [sad]

     
  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 5:46 pm on Thu, Jan 3, 2013.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2255

    And yet we still have a library when the Internet is fast becoming a one-stop resource center for all books, periodicals and other items that are easily found with the click of a mouse or on a "smart" phone. I think it's time we thought seriously about closing that waste of money.

     
  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 5:43 pm on Thu, Jan 3, 2013.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2255

    A 60,000-person population city without its own court house? Somehow this just doesn't seem right. I do hope the numbers will be released soon regarding the savings over such a move. Clearly Stockton's courthouse will charge rent and other service-related charges to the City of Lodi for this move.

    And what about removing Lodi's police from the streets while they travel to/from and spend all that time waiting to be called to testify? I would suspect that many of them might opt to not making a showing at all for traffic-related appearances or even non-violent misdemeanors. So much for justice being served.

     
  • Josh Morgan posted at 4:27 pm on Thu, Jan 3, 2013.

    Josh Morgan Posts: 529

    This is extremely unfortunate. [sad]

     

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 32

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists