Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Galt City Council supports alternative to Bay Delta Conservation Plan

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Friday, February 8, 2013 12:00 am

A letter signed by Galt Mayor Marylou Powers will be forwarded to the state, after the former executive director of the Chamber of Commerce asked the city council to support an alternative Delta water plan. It received unanimous council support at Tuesday's meeting.

Water expert and engineer Robert Pyke, asked to attend Tuesday's meeting by former chamber director Frank Gayaldo, wants natural water flows to be allowed to pass through the Delta before any surplus is extracted for export to Southern California.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

More about

More about

Reference Links

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

3 comments:

  • Robert Pyke posted at 2:53 pm on Fri, Feb 8, 2013.

    Robert Pyke Posts: 1

    Mike Wade is to be commended for his persistence in responding to every criticism or alternative to the BDCP, but the suspicion that he never actually reads these criticisms is confirmed by the fact that in this instance he is responding to the NRDC alternative approach to the BDCP and not to what I proposed to the Galt City Council and what they unanimously agreed to. What I proposed to the Council was that any broad solution to the current crisis in the Delta has to comply with two principles: (1) Allow natural flows to pass through the Delta before any surplus is extracted for export; and (2) Extract more water during high flows and less or no water during low flows. I actually agree with Mike Wade’s conclusion that the NRDC potpourri approach does not solve the problem, in my case because it does not comply with these two basic principles, but neither does the BDCP apparent preferred project. Years of study provides no guarantee that the consultants who have been feeding at the trough have found the optimum solution. It only confirms the obvious which is that it is more in the interest of a bureaucracy or a consulting team to study a problem to death rather than to solve it.

     
  • Mike Wade posted at 10:48 am on Fri, Feb 8, 2013.

    farmwater Posts: 5

    Years of study have gone into the Bay Delta Conservation Plan to achieve the goals of achieving a reliable water supply and a restored Delta ecosystem, as mandated by the California Legislature. Scientists and researchers have studied multiple options and the current proposal includes the twin tunnels with a capacity of 9,000 cfs.

    Contrary to those who believe the tunnels will drain the Sacramento River or take away flows needed for the Delta, the water flowing through the tunnels will increase and decrease according to available water supply.

    The alternative plan being pushed by NRDC features a single 3,000 cfs tunnel is insufficient to meet the needs of all water users, especially farmers in the San Joaquin Valley. BDCP researchers studied a similar undersized proposal more than a year ago and concluded that it did not meet the legislative directive that governs the BDCP. Results of that research can be found here- http://su.pr/1L2lpr

    Mike Wade
    California Farm Water Coalition

     
  • Doug Chaney posted at 6:31 am on Fri, Feb 8, 2013.

    advocate Posts: 501

    The only problem with the Delta issue is that now that the powerful, super majority, power hungry dems have control of the legislature, who will be powerful enough to stop the absurd peripheral canal project. Since water has become such a valuable commodity, being bought and sold for tremendous profits, it appears to me that the Delta issue will be decided on a financial basis, who will stand to profit the most with the canal bypass in place and not a decision based on whether the Delta will survive. The farmers and public will literally be giving this much needed resource away to the southern part of the state to those who will make the huge profits controlling, buying and selling this additional water supply while those who depend on it here in the central valley and Delta will see even less of the paltry amounts they are allotted now. Any Delta water should be taken after the supply passes through the richly laden soils and agricultural venues upstream. Great response, city of Galt.

     
Readers Choice Awards 2014

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

What would you like to see in Lodi's parks?

Lodi's Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department is hosting a public workshop at 7 p.m. at Hutchins Street Square to find out how it can better meet the needs of the community. What would you like to see in Lodi's parks?

Total Votes: 28

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Featured Events

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists