default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Residents confused over lack of due dates on utility bills

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, October 17, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 6:07 am, Mon Oct 17, 2011.

When Sandra Schoch opened her father's recent Lodi Electric Utility bill, she was confused because there was no due date.

Starting in September, Lodi residents started receiving utility bills that said "due upon receipt."

Schoch said she did not remember receiving a letter explaining the change. She worries that residents will not be able to keep track of when the bill is due and be charged a late fee, especially seniors like her father, who has dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

"For people who don't understand it, it might catch them off guard ... It's just one more thing to tack on to somebody. We all have a lot to think about, let alone that, too," she said.

Here's some basic information on the change:

Q: Why did the city make the change?

A: Deputy City Manager Jordan Ayers recently realized that the city was not in compliance with a 1991 ordinance on when bills were due, while reviewing city code for another issue, he said.

Bills are "due and payable upon receipt thereof, at the finance department, City Hall, Lodi, California," the 1991 ordinance reads.

"What we are trying to do is bring ourselves in line with our ordinance," Ayers said.

Q: When does my bill become delinquent?

A: The ordinance says that bills become delinquent 20 days after the post-mark.

Before bills were due 21 days after the billing date, so the time frame has not significantly changed, Ayers said.

Q: Why were residents not informed of the change?

A: The bills sent out in September could have caused some of the confusion, Ayers said.

The front of the bill said it was due upon receipt, but the back of the bills had old language that said residents needed to send in the bills by the due date that should be listed on the front.

"We went out to the printer to get the back sides of the bill changed, and we were a little ahead of ourselves," Ayers said.

As the city finishes out the old stock of bills, Ayers said the backs of the bills will have the new language that also says the bills are "due upon receipt."

Q: Will this save the city money?

A: The city loses about $500,000 a year from people not paying their utility bills, Ayers said.

By telling residents that they have to pay as soon as they get the bill, the hope is that people will pay it right away rather than waiting for a later date, he said.

"It's an attempt to have our good-paying customers stop subsidizing those who do not pay on time," Ayers said.

Q: What are residents saying?

A: On Thursday, eight different residents paying their bill said they did not notice the change, and it would not affect how they pay their bill.

But some members of the Lodi City Council have received questions. Mayor Bob Johnson said he has received about seven calls or emails from residents with concerns.

"People are feeling that without some type of fixed date to pay their bill, they might be subject to a late fee," he said.

John Keagy, who wrote his first letter to the editor ever on the topic (“City of Lodi uses sneaky billing tactics”), said he feels like the city did it to boost its cash flow by having people pay two to three weeks earlier than they normally would.

He also feels it could increase the number of late fees the city collects because many people wait until the due date to pay their bills, and without a specific date, they could miss it accidentally.

"I don't see how it helps the customers. It only makes it better for the city. This shouldn't be an adversarial relationship between the citizens and the city government. They should be making it as easy as possible for its citizens," Keagy said.

He said with the expensive everyday costs residents face — from $150 for an office call at the doctor to $100 an hour to get your car tuned up — the city should be trying to give people as much time as possible to pay their bill.

"It's the city's utility, which is supposed to be owned by the people who live here, and they are trying to gouge people here," Keagy said.

Q: Is the city thinking about changing the bills further?

A: Johnson and several other council members asked staff to evaluate whether having no due dates is the best idea.

"It's an opportunity to tighten up the system. Has it been perfected yet? Probably not. Is there room for improvement? Probably so," Johnson said.

Ayers said city staff is looking at the issue internally and seeing what other utilities are doing in the area. Staff will discuss whether to revise the ordinance, and will come back before the council at a future meeting.

Contact reporter Maggie Creamer at maggiec@lodinews.com. Read her blog at www.lodinews.com/blogs/citybuzz.

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • roy bitz posted at 12:44 pm on Tue, Oct 18, 2011.

    roy bitz Posts: 489

    Ayers says staff will review the ordinance and come back to council before a future meeting----this would be a two minute meeting and the matter would be resolved in minutes in the real world.

  • Elise Middlecamp posted at 5:19 pm on Mon, Oct 17, 2011.

    Elise Middlecamp Posts: 20

    I don't think compliance from 1991 should be enforced 10 years later all of a sudden when they notice it wasn't in compliance. They made the change in 1991, it is not the residents' fault that they did not make this change then.

    It's hard times right now, and Lodi knows it. Not putting a due date on these bills, especially when people have to dance around due dates, is ridiculous.

  • Timothy Tyler posted at 12:19 pm on Mon, Oct 17, 2011.

    Timothy Tyler Posts: 8

    The real question is:
    "How much did it cost us to think up, discuss/debate, get approval and implement this fun little change?" Anyone.....Bueller? No wonder there is no money for a flag pole.

  • Laura Rouzer posted at 11:15 am on Mon, Oct 17, 2011.

    Laura Rouzer Posts: 55

    If they don't want to print a due date and instead make us count days from postmark, then the bill should not be delinquent until the 1st of the next month. They shouldn't be allowed to charge late fees if there is no due date.

  • roy bitz posted at 9:37 am on Mon, Oct 17, 2011.

    roy bitz Posts: 489

    Deputy city manager says " what we are trying to do is bring ourselves into compliance with our own ordinance" that reads-- bills are due upon receipt. Why not simply change the wording in the old ordinance to be in compliance with common practice and common sense?
    It's unbelievable to me--- our highly compensated Deputy City Manager trys to defend this nonsense with more nonsense.

  • Lori Cotten posted at 8:45 am on Mon, Oct 17, 2011.

    LKC Posts: 8

    Do you really have to see what other utilities are doing just post it on the bill Payment Due **** If not paid buy**** a late charge will be applied so simple! don't make us read the small print stop trying to trip us up so you can collect late fees I think the city should be above the sneaky tactics.

  • Kim Lee posted at 8:12 am on Mon, Oct 17, 2011.

    Kim Lee Posts: 1798

    Sounds like we have to count out 20 days from the postmark on the bill to know our actual due date (last day to pay). It seems odd that they just can't post that date on the bill.

  • Bob Smith posted at 6:55 am on Mon, Oct 17, 2011.

    Bob Smith Posts: 128

    How does this affect those of us who pay our bill through automatic withdrawals from bank accounts? In the past, the amount was deducted on the due date. Now when will it be taken out?



Popular Stories


Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 100


Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists