default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Walnut orchard in Lockeford protected from development

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, August 1, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 7:03 am, Wed Aug 27, 2014.

John Galeazzi of Modesto comes from a line of Italian immigrants who began farming in California in 1894. Thanks to an agricultural conservation easement protecting a 250-acre walnut orchard in Lockeford, that family line can continue indefinitely.

Galeazzi and his son-in-law grow three varieties of walnuts on the orchard he purchased in 2004. The orchard acts as a mile-long natural buffer against development in the area. The city of Lockeford is on one side, and the Mokelumne River runs along the other. The rich river soil has lent itself to a consistent walnut crop, said Galeazzi, but land near the river is often bought up to build riverfront ranchettes.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?



You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?



Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Ted Lauchland posted at 2:37 pm on Thu, Aug 2, 2012.

    Ted Lauchland Posts: 261

    A few years back I was part of the "Land Use" committee of the Farm Bureau . The depth of this subject was huge. To answer to what has come up on this blog could start with yes , rights are rights and should be protected. This man has not given up his. His land was sold in the way of an easement out of concern for preservation of the endangered species called " man ". It changed the value of the land to remain at ag level instead of the forced progress that eventually eats up prime farmland. You can't grow food on cement.

    God owns it , the government owns it , we own it and we should all be good stewards. What ?- I'm an enviromentalist? - Of the most practical kind thank you.

    There are several types of easements that are available. Habitat and Ag easements are sometimes combined and separated to their requirements to preserve them as such. For instance river front property that have row crops. The river area is habitat while the ag land is restricted to just that.
    I fought a neighbor that put his into an easement as it affected what I was to do up wind of him. He eventually got it which was actually a good and bad thing at the same time. I believe a man should be able to do what he wants with a piece of property so long as it doesn't affect anyone else's. - Right. The purchase was not made for some time as the county could not do it until funds were available. - Yes , our pockets.

    I also farmed a piece that I did not own but was owned by AT&T - for forty years. We had an agreement to maintain the property as ag but when it came to the point of reinvestment I could not continue. The city had been built out to it's borders and the tidal wave of the public made it impossible to farm. If I had owned it I would have sold it. Buffer land now was the conversation at the FB. Also, - ag land conversion to housing subdivision - fees were a joke and is now a more real equation to help slow down the "general plan" county/city progression.
    School districts and churches are still a problem and are chopping up ag properties.

    The future had been looking alot like "Welcome to the state of Los Angeles Thank You"

    All that was better done with local control than a vision from someone else a world away. Yes - our money. Harney Lane owners are now in the middle of all that. "Government" is supposed to solve big issues involving all of us but we still have a voice as we are all part of it.
    My retirement is in my land. Should I sell it at a premium and eat cement or should I do better than that .- My rights - my decision.

  • Kim Parigoris posted at 4:40 pm on Wed, Aug 1, 2012.

    Kim Parigoris Posts: 470

    A private individual has every right to do what he wants with his land, and that is none of my business...When public monies are being used to acquire these easements, it becomes ALL of our businesses....And there is usually some "endangered species" connected with these easements, and in many California instances it is the Swainson's Hawk, "It should be noted that the Swainson's Hawk was removed from the active Federal list because it was found to be more abundant than previously thought; it is not considered a threatened species by the IUCN due to its wide overall range.[12] It remains listed as a threatened species by the California Department of Fish and Game as it has been since 1983." These conservations easements are nothing but a land the name of ecology, using the good intentions of people's trust and naivety...

  • Karen Bracken posted at 1:18 pm on Wed, Aug 1, 2012.

    Kendra Tilley Posts: 1

    This poor guy just got taken for the ride of his life. He thinks he did a good thing for his land and his heirs but he just got taken but good. And left his heirs to suffer the consequences. Conservation Easements are a way for the government to get your land. These companies that approach unsuspecting citizens are nothing more than used car salesmen. They will flip this easement in time and the rules of engagement change and there will be NOTHING the owner or the heirs can do about it. His once rich farm will someday be worthless to him and to his heirs. There is a golden rule that we should all take the time to remember. IF IT SOUNDS TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT IS! Why does the government or anyone else care about your land………..oh I forgot to protect it from the bad guys. LIE LIE LIE. Read the book HOW TO KILL 1 MILLION PEOPLE. The same principle is being used on the American people to steal their land. UN Agenda 21 is behind it all. The UN wants total control of the NWO and they must destroy the US to do it. Taking our land and abolishing property rights is part of the plan. DO YOU REALLY OWN YOUR LAND? Think about it. More and more each year you are loosing the ability to manage your own private property. WAKE UP PEOPLE. DO NOT GIVE THE RIGHTS TO YOUR LAND TO ANYONE!!!! It is a scam and you are being taken!!

  • Kim Parigoris posted at 12:50 pm on Wed, Aug 1, 2012.

    Kim Parigoris Posts: 470

    So part of this money came from mitigation funds from Stockton..hhmm- I wonder how the retirees of city employees, who are losing their medical benefits due to a lack of funds, feel about that. These easements are perpetual and go with the land. The land holder is no longer in control of their land and if they do decide to ever sell, there are buyers who won't touch conservation easement properties with a 10 foot pole. Who knows what will happen in 50 years when your heirs may inherit this property...maybe walnuts will be passe and your ability to farm what you want will be gone.. Some facts about land easements, even though they vary greatly between properties: Land trusts frequently flip conservation easements to make money quickly..The Nature Conservancy paid 1.2million for an easement and promptly sold it to the Bureau of Land Management for 1.4. This enabled the government to control the private property with no publicity and place the landowner under the scrutiny of a federal bureaucracy. Through "mitigation banking" your property can become part of a databank, condemned and used to offset envrionmental damage to another conservation eased property hundreds of miles away. The trust can then use your land for purposes you never intended. Third party trusts, non-profits or public agencies can attack or enforce the agreement you made with your land trust thereby changing the original agreement.
    Moral of the story? If it sounds too good to be true-it probably isn't!!



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists