Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Opponents hope to stop move of elephants from the Toronto Zoo to PAWS

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:06 am, Tue May 1, 2012.

A Toronto resident has launched a public attack against the Galt-based Performing Animal Welfare Society, with hopes of thwarting plans to move three elephants from Canada to the San Andreas sanctuary.

It started with an unsolicited email in March sent to close to 50 recipients, including local media, national publications such as the New York Times and Huffington Post, and animal rights organizations such as primatologist Jan Goodall’s group.

The letter was signed “a representative of a very concerned group” and came from the email address “truth for the Toronto Zoo elephants.” Among other things, the writer is concerned about PAWS elephants’ exposure to tuberculosis and transferring three aging elephants there from the Toronto Zoo.

Opponents claim the October decision was made hastily and by the wrong people; the Toronto City Councillors approved the move without direct input from zoo staff.

The trio of Toronto elephants — affectionately known as the “TZ 3” — was scheduled to leave Canada for California by cargo airplane Monday.

Now it’s not clear when or even if PAWS will receive the trio. Activist Bob Barker, a friend of PAWS founder and president Pat Derby, has reportedly wavered on whether he will pay for the flight to move them due to legal wrangling, according to newspapers in Canada.

Derby, who could not be reached for comment but has issued a statement via PAWS’ website and written a letter addressing the controversy to the Toronto Star, said she doesn’t blame Barker.

“(His) generous donation deserves a huge vote of gratitude from everyone in the city,” she wrote in a letter to the editor of the Toronto Star this weekend. “If Mr. Barker decides to withdraw his offer, and he should, the city and the taxpayers who support the zoo will be left with a million-dollar financial burden.”

At the center of the latest effort to thwart the move is that the elephants will be joining PAWS’ elephants, which have been exposed to carriers of TB.

Elephants can not only carry the same strain of TB that humans can, but they can transmit the highly contagious disease to both humans and one another. In 1993, the World Health Organization declared the tuberculosis epidemic to be a global emergency, as some elephants come into frequent contact with the public through circuses, elephant rides and exhibitions.

Derby has posted a response on her website’s blog refuting the “truth for the Toronto Zoo elephants” group’s claims and summarizing efforts to combat TB at the organization’s two sites.

On the public blog post, she said there are two relatively new blood tests that are not approved or used in Canada but are required by the United States Department of Agriculture, which indicate if the elephant has ever been exposed to TB. If an elephant is reactive to either test, the USDA recommends more frequent trunk wash testing for that elephant, according to Derby.

Because PAWS accepts elephants from zoos known to have active TB, they are always quarantined for at least one year and trunk wash tested several times. For example, two such elephants were kept at PAWS’ Galt facility — the only elephants on that property — for a year and a half before being moved to San Andreas, Derby wrote. And another, known as “Prince,” is currently in an isolated quarantine area there.

“All of our African elephants, with which the Toronto elephants will be housed, have been non-reactive to the blood tests, and we always keep separate cleaning equipment, feed buckets and supplies for each elephant barn,” Derby wrote. She added that the African elephant habitat and barn is completely separate from all other elephants and barns.

Prince, who has tested reactive to one of the blood tests, receives trunk wash tests frequently and cultures are consistently negative, according to Derby.

The day after her post, the same anonymous “concerned group,” whose writer declined to provide a name to the News-Sentinel, responded with a follow-up email.

“PAWS has ... finally under duress admitted that they do have TB in their elephants. I would imagine they are only admitting to the most obvious once it’s clear they are in denial and not in control of the disease,” the writer claimed.

In the ongoing public debate, Derby has also lashed out at the Toronto Star newspaper after an article was published Friday that implied Barker was among the reasons an international organization that sets the standards for most major North American zoos stripped the Toronto Zoo of its accreditation. Some claim the reason is because the zoo is sending its elephants to PAWS, an unaccredited facility.

But the future of the elephant exhibit became an issue after seven elephants died at the zoo since 1984, according to the Star newspaper.

Consultants were hired to explore the best options, and a staff report released last year recommended phasing out the elephant exhibit due to costs.

In the end, the email author, who told the News-Sentinel they are a Toronto citizen but neither a zookeeper nor a zoo employee, said the group wants what’s best for the original trio of elephants that have lived nowhere else other than the Toronto Zoo.

“I understand that a lot of people feel PAWS is the only place these elephants could go, but they have other options available to them and their caregivers — not politicians — should be deciding the best homes for these specific elephants,” the writer said.

Since the zoo is owned by the city of Toronto, the city council makes decisions about its animals.

“PAWS is a fine facility for circus elephants who have tuberculosis or have been exposed to TB previously — these animals need somewhere to retire from a life of performing,” the writer said in an email Monday.

“(PAWS) is an organization that is fixated on acquiring healthy new animals and placing them into a situation where they may be infected. ... The only way to be 100 percent sure you would not infect a healthy animal is not to move one there in the first place. It is not worthwhile to move the elephants to a home where they will not get a diverse family life but may get TB.”

Contact reporter Jennifer Bonnett at jenniferb@lodinews.com.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Lori Sirianni posted at 2:01 am on Thu, May 3, 2012.

    lorisirianni Posts: 1

    I'm stunned that any serious journalist would write an entire news story like this based on an "anonymous" email? Sorry, but if you cannot confirm - at least to yourself even if you agree not to reveal your source - the identity of the writer, it is yellow journalism at BEST for this absurd article to have ever seen the light of day. I would recommend you read the Facebook page, "Concerned Elephant Keepers", a group in which the Toronto Zoo elephant keepers have written and posted unrelenting lies and vitriol against PAWS since last October, to figure out who your mystery emailer is.

    Secondly, the elephant keepers have ulterior motives for trying to derail the move to PAWS: they are trying, instead, to get the elephants sent to the AZA facility (not even built yet!) called the National Elephant Center in Florida. They are openly stating on the aforementioned page that they also want to get jobs there. Who could blame them, to leave frigid Toronto for balmy Florida? Except that it would be a form of an unethical, if not illegal, payoff for them to thwart the move in order to snag high-paying new jobs for themselves. I would suggest the reporter do some digging into the backgrounds of the Toronto Zoo elephant keepers and their dealings with the AZA.

    And if I'm wrong, I wonder if all the elephant keepers would be willing to sign a 40-year noncompete agreement preventing them from transferring to the proposed NEC or any other American zoo?

     

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 227

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists