Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Three of state’s most polluted areas in Stockton

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 12:00 am

Seven of California’s 10 zip codes most burdened by pollution are in the San Joaquin Valley and three are in Los Angeles, according to a new tool developed by state environmental officials to target communities for cleanup.

“People tend to think of more urban areas when they think of pollution effects,” said Sam Delson, a spokesman for the California Environmental Protection Agency. “That isn’t necessarily the case.”

Delson said the most immediate outcome for some of the communities might be investments and grants from the state’s cap-and-trade fund, where 25 percent of the money is supposed to be earmarked to improve the worst pockets of pollution.

The study of 1,769 zip code areas by the Cal EPA looked at everything from pesticide use to traffic density to groundwater threats. It scored the environmental hazards in each community then added in human health factors such as the number of children and elderly in the area, the birth weights of infants, asthma rates and poverty levels.

The resulting CalEnviroScreen released Tuesday on the Cal EPA’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment website is a tool that can be used by planners to identify communities most burdened by pollution and to direct cleanup funding to them.

“This at least gives some idea of what the impacts are on the communities that are overburdened,” said Caroline Farrell, executive director of the Delano-based Center on Race, Poverty & the Environment. “Once you identify them you can make improvements.”

While there have been previous attempts to look at individual types of pollution, Delson said this is believed to be the first to consider cumulative impacts on the vulnerable populations of people who live there, especially vulnerable populations of the very young and the very old.

The top 10 cities include three zip codes in Stockton, three in Fresno and one in Bakersfield, all Central Valley areas routinely listed among the most polluted in the state. In Southern California, East Los Angeles, Vernon, and Baldwin Park are also in the top 10.

Dozens of other cities in the San Joaquin Valley, Inland Empire of Southern California and pockets of industrialized areas around the San Francisco Bay were among the 10 percent of the state zip codes that scored highest in potential impacts on people who live there.

The study looked at 11 types of pollution in each zip code, including pesticides, particulate pollution, ozone and diesel emissions, and seven socioeconomics factors.

The study is the most comprehensive to date on pollution and its impacts on vulnerable populations and communities with high poverty. It comes out of a 2004 mandate by Cal EPA to consider environmental justice when making cleanup and permitting decisions.

“This is all data that is publicly available, but it has never been assembled and combined in an analytical way,” Delson said.

The League of California Cities initially balked at the idea of the study, thinking results would stymie development in blighted areas. In response Cal EPA stressed in the final version that the study was not intended to substitute for local environmental assessments for development.

Also agriculture interests complained that the presence of pesticides in a community does not correlate to exposure levels, a point Cal EPA concedes. The agency said the assessments of pesticides in communities will be updated as more data becomes available in the coming years.

© 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

More about

More about

Reference Links

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

5 comments:

  • Doug Chaney posted at 10:14 am on Fri, Apr 26, 2013.

    advocate Posts: 499

    Mr. Morgan, Lodi/Stockton. Thanks to LUSD.

     
  • Doug Chaney posted at 11:59 am on Thu, Apr 25, 2013.

    advocate Posts: 499

    Lodi/Stockton!

     
  • Josh Morgan posted at 10:45 am on Thu, Apr 25, 2013.

    Josh Morgan Posts: 529

    Doug, article points out that it's three zip codes in the City of Stockton therefore it is not the Stockton/Lodi area. I'm just wondering if they are referring to environmental pollution or political pollution?

     
  • Doug Chaney posted at 5:30 pm on Wed, Apr 24, 2013.

    advocate Posts: 499

    Isn't that Stockton/Lodi?

     
  • Robert Jacobs posted at 8:31 am on Wed, Apr 24, 2013.

    Robert Jacobs Posts: 298

    The thugs or the police will kill you long before any pollution does!

     

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists