Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

A closer look at Lodi Unified School District’s social networking policy

Assistant Superintendent Dawn Vetica discusses how and why policy was created

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Dawn Vetica

Posted: Thursday, August 8, 2013 12:00 am

Lodi Unified School District’s social networking policy has drawn criticism this week from some who believe it infringes on First Amendment rights. Under the policy, students can be suspended from an athletic team or club activity for online bullying or making inappropriate comments about students and staff. Upon multiple offenses, they can be suspended for the entire season.

In response to concerns raised at this week’s school board meeting, two trustees, Bonnie Cassel and George Neely, asked concerned students to help them clarify the policy.

Lodi Unified School District social networking guidelines (PDF)

Lodi Unified School District social networking offenses (PDF)

Dawn Vetica, assistant superintendent for middle and high schools, responded to a News-Sentinel questionnaire regarding the policy. Here are her responses:

What was the reason this policy was developed? Were there any particular incidents that triggered the development of the policy?

The social networking guidelines and contract were developed when school officials realized that athletes, who are high-profile student representatives of the school, were getting involved in cyberbullying and/or inappropriate and slanderous comments about other students and staff. There was not one particular incident that triggered it, but it is an ongoing issue. The policy is meant to be preventive, not reactive.

Was there input from students, teachers, coaches or parents while this policy was being developed?

The policy was researched and developed by Lodi High administrators, shared with administrators at our other high schools and shared with the board of education, which wholeheartedly supported it. Everyone believed that there was a huge need for such a policy.

Who investigates the validity of a tweet, Facebook or other post accused of being inappropriate? Rumor has it that some say it’s the individual coach, while others say the school administration and others say the district office.

These posts are brought to school administrators’ attention by offended parents and students. As in any disciplinary issue at a school, administration would determine the consequences of the student’s actions. School personnel determine what inappropriate behavior and comments are on a daily basis.

This policy doesn’t cover students who are not involved in extracurricular activities. I understand that other students are covered by the district’s anti-bullying policy. What does that policy include, and how is it enforced? What are penalties for those not in extracurricular activities?

This policy is an extension of the 24/7 alcohol and drug policy for athletes in their season of sport, which is approved by the California Interscholastic Federation and the district.

In the 24/7 drug and alcohol policy, it states that posting inappropriate alcohol/drug messages or pictures on social media can be used as evidence of a violation. Penalties are levied on a progressive scale, from a warning up to and through suspension.

Some say the policy is too vague, especially in determining what constitutes an “inappropriate comment.” How is it determined what is and isn’t appropriate?

School personnel determine what inappropriate behavior and comments are on a daily basis. Other students are covered in the district’s anti-harassment policy. Visit www.tinyurl.com/ kybp843 and scroll to policy No. 5145.5.

Are there plans to work with concerned students about clarifying the policy, as board members George Neely and Bonnie Cassel requested at Tuesday’s board meeting? Are there any plans to return the policy, at least as for discussion, at the Aug. 20 board meeting?

Superintendent Cathy Nichols-Washer and I will meet with high school principals to clarify and possibly adjust some of the language of the policy. If changes are made, we will present it to the board of education at our next meeting on Aug. 20. The community is welcome to send any suggestions to us before Friday, Aug. 16. Emails may be sent to dvetica@lodiusd.net.

More about

More about

More about

Reference Links

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

2 comments:

  • Doug Chaney posted at 6:09 pm on Fri, Aug 9, 2013.

    advocate Posts: 499

    What vague answers to nearly all of these questions asked here and for an assistant superintendent this lady gives the appearance of being pretty well uninformed about what's happening in our own school district and a specially on her own job. When will Lodi Unified ever ensure us taxpaying citizens that we are getting the bang for our bucks with some of these overpaid administrators? The reporter should've elaborated on answers for some of these questions rather than just moving on to the next silly retorts.

     
  • Zachary Denney posted at 10:21 am on Fri, Aug 9, 2013.

    zachdenney Posts: 1

    I personally think it's funny how board members Cassel and Neely expressed a desire at Tuesday's board meeting, and when asked about it by the writer of this article, Vetica completely ignored any mention of a discussion with students. Why send or email suggestions to you when you can easily cast them to the side, which I'm certain will happen. Another thing I've noticed with her answers is that she doesn't even fully answer her questions.

     

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 90

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists