default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

North San Joaquin Water Conservation District’s future is topic at meeting

Board hopes to come up with plan to retain area’s water rights

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 12:00 am

In the wake of Measure C’s defeat, the North San Joaquin Water Conservation District discussed ideas to retain the district’s water rights and possible collaborations with other agencies at a public meeting Tuesday morning.

Board president Tom Hoffman recommended the district host a town hall meeting before the end of the month for members of the community to come together and offer solutions to the area’s groundwater problems. The town hall would be the first in a series of meetings intended to bring stakeholders to the table and exchange ideas, he said.

“We need to get as many people and ... proposals as possible,” Hoffman said. “Do we need to change the board? The manager? Shrink the district?”

Manager Ed Steffani said the district could look to local agencies such as the Groundwater Banking Authority and the Eastern Water Alliance for help generating revenue. He also proposed the district could request voluntary payments of a groundwater charge.

The town hall will be held at 6 p.m. inside Crete Hall at Hutchins Street Square on July 27.

Other meeting highlights:

• Four of the five board members, Mark Beck, Dan Parises, Joseph Mehrten and Hoffman, must all run for election in November. The nomination period for potential candidates will run from Monday through Aug. 6.

• The district voted 4-0 to request a removal of a point of diversion to the State Water Resources Control Board. The point of diversion would have been necessary in order for the district to send water to Stockton. Since the district voted earlier this year not to send water outside its borders, the point of diversion is no longer needed, the board said.

• The district also voted to approve a letter in response to a Grand Jury investigation into the board. The letter to the Grand Jury addresses issues that were contained in the jury’s report, and looks at what the district has done to remedy them. Many of the Grand Jury’s findings revolved around transparency and public education. The district said it agrees with the Grand Jury’s findings in the letter, and multiple directors have spoken openly about how the jury’s report shows the district isn’t up to anything illegal.

• Members of the district also expressed displeasure with board member Bryan Pilkington’s appearance before the state’s Natural Resources and Water Committee in late June. Pilkington spoke before the committee in opposition to AB 2483, a bill district members said they have no interest in and doesn’t apply to North San Joaquin. AB 2483 would establish the Santa Clara Valley Water District and give it powers relating to flood management and water supply.

While Pilkington spoke against the AB 2483, it’s unclear if he did so as a spokesperson of the North San Joaquin district. Pilkington did not attend Tuesday’s meeting, and phone calls placed to his residence were not immediately returned.

Directors Mehrten, Hoffman and manager Steffani said Pilkington had not told them he planned on missing Tuesday’s meeting.

The district has sent letters to the chairs of the Senate Local Government and Natural Resources and Water committees saying Pilkington was not speaking on behalf of the board and the district has taken no action in regard to AB 2483.

The district is seeking transcripts or video of Pilkington’s testimony before deciding what it will do next.

“We didn’t take any disciplinary action,” said Mehrten. “We will see what he did and how or if he represented the board when he spoke.”

Contact reporter Jordan Guinn at jordang@lodinews.com.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.


Popular Stories


Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 85


Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists