Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Galt elementary school district board makes up for violation of Brown Act

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, December 15, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 6:12 am, Thu Dec 15, 2011.

For roughly six days, Grace Malson was a member of the Galt Joint Union Elementary School District board of trustees. For one hour on Wednesday, she wasn’t. But by the end of that hour, her position had been restored and not much had changed.

In a rare move, the board held a special meeting Wednesday specifically to address a violation of the Brown Act at their Dec. 8 meeting.

Five candidates were interviewed for a seat on the board left open by former trustee Jennifer Collier. They included Malson, former high school trustee Patrick Maple, retired Galt police officer William Hogan, Galt resident Hillary Crownover, and former elementary trustee Robert Ellis.

When resident Al Baldwin asked to address the candidates last week, he was denied by board president John Gordon. Malson was unanimously appointed to the job.

But it turns out that blocking a member of the public from commenting during the allotted time is a violation of California’s open meeting law, also known as the Brown Act.

The board decided to make amends by holding a new special meeting.

“How you operated violated the Brown Act, plain and simple,” Maple said Wednesday.

Each candidate was contacted by Superintendent Karen Schauer about the special meeting. Only Malson and Maple appeared.

“I’m just rolling with the punches,” Malson said before the meeting.

The board had one objective in mind.

“The goal tonight is to correct a misunderstanding regarding public comment,” board president John Gordon said at the beginning of the meeting.

The first step was to rescind Malson’s appointment and re-open the floor to comments from the candidates, the public and the board.

Maple spoke first, reading from a prepared statement directed at Gordon.

“These meetings are not intended to provide the board with time to speak,” he said. “They are to provide the public with time to speak. You should always fall on the side of hearing more, not less.”

Maple said he did not call for a new meeting in an effort to change the outcome of last week’s appointment. Instead, he wanted to highlight the board’s mistake.

“My opinion is that you should have known the rules. You obviously do not. That is against the law,” Maple said.

Gordon could not be reached for comment before moving into an unrelated closed session meeting.

He also addressed comments Gordon made publicly regarding letters to the editor and blog posts written by Maple that have been published in the News-Sentinel and on the newspaper’s website.

“You didn’t ask me, could I check my ego at the door? Yes. I did it for 14 years,” said Maple, referring to his time on the high school board. “Do you? I don’t think you do. You did not give me the benefit of the doubt. You brought your prejudice with you.”

Malson did not speak for the duration of the meeting.

A chain of public speakers made it clear that Gordon’s misstep would not be tolerated.

“A person who has that ability to speak up would be an asset to your board, especially in these trying economic times,” said Dennis Richardson, who spent four of his six years on the high school board serving with Maple. Richardson felt it is in appropriate to address a person’s character in an open meeting.

Baldwin also took advantage of the opportunity to address the board.

“I want to clear the air,” he said, introducing his two part question. “Do you realize you don’t have to pick someone; it’s not forced on you?”

Baldwin felt it might have been more appropriate for the board to conduct the candidate interviews behind closed doors. His second question was whether board members receive training on ethics and following the Brown Act.

Trustee Susan Richardson said board members receive training on those issues. “The problem is that we’re people and we don’t remember everything,” she said.

She is married to Dennis Richardson, who spoke at the meeting.

Baldwin suggested the meeting move public comment about items not on the agenda to the beginning of each meeting, so parents with concerns can address the board without having to wait hours.

“You’ve got to listen. That’s the key right there: Listen,” he said.

The final public comment came from Gene Davenport, who ran for city council last year.

“I think you guys have really botched this,” he said, adding that the board owed each candidate an apology. “They didn’t deserve what happened last week.”

Board members did their best to address the aired grievances.

“The public can fill out a card to comment. We considered that to be sufficient opportunity. There was some opinion that it wasn’t and we needed to take the extra step,” Kevin Papineau said. He also explained that the Brown Act requires interviews for appointments and elections to be conducted in a public meeting.

Schauer clarified that there is a public comment period for each specific agenda item, as well as a time allotted for items not on the agenda. She apologized for the board’s mistake.

“There are things I could have done that night so we wouldn’t be having this meeting,” she said.

When the audience completed their comments Wednesday, Gordon was cautious in moving forward. Board members and candidates were asked repeatedly if they had any comments to share.

When Richardson asked her peers if they needed to discuss the item on the special agenda — appointing a provisional candidate — Gordon, Papineau and board member Wesley Cagle shook their heads.

“I guess we don’t need to discuss, then,” she said.

In the end, the board voted again. The result was unanimous.

After the meeting, Maple and Baldwin said they were satisfied with how it played out.

“They did what they were supposed to do,” said Maple.

Baldwin thinks the board could use a refresher course on the Brown Act.

“The actions determine the training. If they had training, it didn’t show,” he said. “The pressure they are under right now is tremendous, so they need to have that down.”

Contact reporter Sara Jane Pohlman at sarap@lodinews.com.

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Patrick W Maple posted at 11:59 am on Thu, Dec 15, 2011.

    Pat Maple Posts: 1804

    It was commendable for the Superintendent to take the heat for this...however, it is the Board president who runs the meetings. Period. He should have told the people about the procedure (many people come for the first time...are they expected to know the procedures?). Which tells me there could be a systemic problem...one far greater than this one.

    A Board member has no authority outside of the Board...unless directed by the Board to speak on its behalf...anything he writes, says or imposes does not represent the Board or District and should only be contributed to him. Period. Mr Gordon has on many occasions listed his credentials in this paper as "Board President, Galt Joint Elementary School District"...the Board should have corrected him. This practice must stop.

    Mr Richardson was correct in his observations...“A person who has that ability to speak up would be an asset to your board, especially in these trying economic times,” He is an asset, as well as Mr Baldwin and Mr Davenport for their contributions. I commend them as well.

     

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 91

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists