Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Lodi City Council gets first tour of water treatment plant

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 7:19 am, Wed Apr 25, 2012.

Lodi city officials and several members of the public received their first look at the new surface water treatment plant currently under construction near Turner Road and Mills Avenue on Tuesday.

The plant will be able to pump and treat 10 million gallons a day from the Mokelumne River. The water will then go through Lodi's underground distribution system, where it will be combined with the city's current supply of well water.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

3 comments:

  • roy bitz posted at 12:44 pm on Wed, Apr 25, 2012.

    roy bitz Posts: 500

    The contract is for six thousand acre feet a year --- still a drop in the bucket compared to the over draft problem--- this project does next to nothing as far as solving the over draft problem but it sucks up a lot of rate payer money and always will.

     
  • Jackson Scott posted at 11:48 am on Wed, Apr 25, 2012.

    Jackson Scott Posts: 386

    Maggie, perhaps you or Wally can help me, I'm confused with this story. This new plant can process 10M gallons a day? Or 10M per year?

    One acre foot of water = 325,851 gallons. Lodi purchased six acre feet per year so that is only 1,955.106 gallons. Again, only 1.96M gallons per year. Granted, we've banked almost ten years of water so we would want a plant than can process more than we've purchased per year, but something in this story does not add up to me.

    If this plant could process 10M gallons per day X 365 days = 3.65 Billion gallons a year. NO chance this could be correct. Of course,this could be another "Fleecing of America."

     
  • roy bitz posted at 10:22 am on Wed, Apr 25, 2012.

    roy bitz Posts: 500

    Let's be honest!
    The plant alone may only cost rate payers 36 million but total cost of this forty year project is closer to 200 million dollars.
    We were told this plant was needed because our ground water is being over drafted. True. However, the water contract is for 6,000 afa while the over draft is 200,000.
    This project amounts to just 3% of the over draft--- a drop in the bucket-- at great and ongoing cost to rate payers.

     
Readers Choice Awards 2014

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists