default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Galt High board chooses programs for high schools

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, January 10, 2008 10:00 pm

After much debate, Galt High School District's board decided on Thursday night to offer agriculture and pre-engineering programs at both Liberty Ranch and Galt high schools in a 4-1 vote.

The board's plan would allow the additions of the two programs as long as the district did not have to dip into the general fund or commit to any long-term borrowing.

Trustee Sue Roberts voted against the item.

The district had originally proposed that it would offer specialized programs at each of its two high schools when it applied for a state grant for career and technical education in June of last year.

By that scenario, students would be able to choose which high school they wanted to attend based on their interest in a particular program.

In its application for the grant, the district said it would place the agriculture and health programs at its new Liberty Ranch High School and put its pre-engineering and auto diesel programs at Galt High School.

When the district's grant application was approved in October, though, its staff realized that the district did not have enough money to match the money it was going to receive from the state, a requirement to receive the grant.

"The 1D grant that we proposed was too expensive and we cannot afford it," said Tom Gemma, the district's superintendent.

The board gathered at a special meeting in November of last year to discuss options. It was then that both the agriculture and pre-engineering advisory committees requested to have their programs at both campuses.

Though Gemma said offering both the programs at each of the two high schools was plausible, he advised the board to stick to the original plan for several reasons.

Galt High School District has yet to decided the future of every program at Galt and Liberty Ranch high schools, but they have pinned down a few programs.
The following is a list of programs will be offered at the two high schools:

Galt High School
• Agriculture
• Pre-engineering
• Auto diesel

Liberty Ranch High School
• Agriculture
• Pre-engineering
• Health
- News-Sentinel staff.

Gemma said he was unsure that the state would even allow the district to change the plan it presented on its application.

Also, afraid that state budget cutbacks would force district to tighten its belt even further, Gemma warned that adding even more expenses to its plate could put the district in a precarious financial situation.

Offering the agriculture and the pre-engineering program at both high schools would cost the district approximately $500,000, according to district estimates.

A few community members agreed with Gemma.

Parent Connie Goethel said that she didn't want the district to go further into debt.

"I don't see melting (the agriculture and pre-engineering programs) down into two if we can have them top notch at one," Goethel said.

However, several other community members argued that by only offering the programs at one high school, the district was forcing students to make choices in the eighth-grade that would impact their career paths.

"Magnet schools don't offer choices; they offer tough choices," said Jim Aschwanden, former Galt High agriculture teacher and executive director of the California Agricultural Teachers' Association.

Galt High agriculture teachers said that students were attracted to the program by seeing it on campus.

Mandy Garner, an agriculture teacher, said in a recent poll students described the program as "a home away from home" and "a niche that we can belong to."

"You want to kill a program, stick it in a cubbyhole and don't let anybody see it," Aschwanden said.

Hugh Mooney, a former agriculture teacher, said offering agriculture and pre-engineering courses at only one school discourages students who have to travel farther to get to the school where their program of choice is offered. Not every student can afford that increased transportation cost, he said.

"Magnet schools don't work, period," Mooney said.

While, ultimately, most of the board members sided with Mooney, not everybody shared the same sentiment.

Roberts said that the board had not discussed what job opportunities are available to students once they graduate and how that impacts the education that the district offers.

Roberts also disagreed with spending more money in the face of proposed budget cuts.

Galt resident Kathleen Amos also disagreed with the board's direction, saying that by offering the agriculture program at each site, the board was spending too much money on too few students.

"They have a single agenda to forward the ag program," Amos said.

Contact reporter Amanda Dyer at amandad@lodinews.com.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • posted at 4:21 am on Fri, Jan 11, 2008.


    Ag is hardly in a cubbyhole. They receive more money than ALL OTHER academic programs combined. Jim Aschwanden, Hugh Mooney (whom he works for) and Ms Garner are all self serving on this issue. They didn't get their Taj Mahal so they are after the next best thing. Go to Plan F. What happened to saving money for the taxpayers, Oelsner? $15K vs $500K??

  • posted at 3:20 am on Fri, Jan 11, 2008.


    Here we go again. Is this The Lodi paper or Galt Herald? LUSD superintendant Huyett just quit and this news should be about LUSD and not Galt. Mr. Huyett didn't just quit out of the blue. Another fluff article by the Sentinel and their inexperienced staff. Galt does just fine and again Lodi tries to make them look like they're in such turmoil in Galt to seemingly make Lodi look good. Let's start exposing these Lodi crooks before chastising Galt!

  • posted at 2:11 am on Fri, Jan 11, 2008.


    This is not a surprise that the board members that promised us that they would not let Galt High become the forgotten High School are doing exactly that. They have lied to us since the beginning about this new school. What about a band, choir, Drama etc. are these kids getting the same oppurtunity at both schools? Of course not, just the ones that effect Terry and her gang! Oh, I guess it is OK for them to suffer undo travel etc(Mr. Ashwanden, Mz. Garner and Mr. Mooney). Please remember this, come next election everyone. By the way when will all the improvements start at Galt High that we were promised as part of this bond that Terry and the Gang promised us. I guess I shouldn't care because my grandchildren will go to the new school but it just does not seem fair that most of the population of that school will be people from Herald, Acampo, and the East side. The magnet school system kept everything somewhat equal. Another thing we were promised this would not happen. Hey people they are doing exctly what they said the would not!! They accuse Sue Roberts of being a "LIAR", Look in the MIRROR!!! She is probably the only one that actually has the young Ladies & Men on her mind in all of her decisions. Just my thoughts early Friday AM.



Popular Stories


Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 90


Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists