default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Charter school sued for alleged molestation

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, October 1, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 7:53 am, Sat Oct 1, 2011.

The mother of a girl allegedly molested last fall by an art teacher at a Lodi Unified School District charter school is suing the alleged assailant, the school and another teacher allegedly involved in the abuse.

The plaintiff, whose 11-year-old daughter was an art student of Michael Hartsock at Aspire Schools, alleges in court documents prepared by attorney Trenton Diehl that her daughter was "systematically and methodically groomed for sexual molestation" by the educator.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?



You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?



More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Mike Adams posted at 7:07 pm on Thu, Oct 6, 2011.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1574

    Perhaps I shouldn't have left off the preamble and part 2 of my warning. In it's entirety it goes like this:
    (For teacher behind closed door with a student, particularly if it's the opposite sex, but not always)
    "When this goes bad and they always go bad', (Preamble)
    Who stands to lose everything?' (Part 1 warning)
    Who stands to gain everything, compassion, sympathy, and probably a big, a very big payday? Not the teacher" (Part 2)

    Also, since the DA has already filed charges, it doesn't look good for either of these two guys and it doesn't matter how nice they were. When this is over, I can't imagine either of them ever getting a teaching job in CA again, probably nowhere in the US. Great career move (if you wanted to get out of teaching).

    Let this be a warning, but every year, some new group of morons gets into the same hot water with the same outcome. What are they teaching in teacher preparation courses these days?

  • Kim Lee posted at 4:41 pm on Thu, Oct 6, 2011.

    Kim Lee Posts: 1798

    Why would their lawyer encourage this civil action before the criminal case is complete?

  • Joanne Bobin posted at 2:04 pm on Thu, Oct 6, 2011.

    Joanne Bobin Posts: 4488

    I think that the most telling part of this story is that the parent(s) are suing even before the criminal case has been resolved. Seems that once the criminal case is resolved, especially a guilty verdict, the chances are better for a civil win.

    Smells fishy....Maybe these parents can't wait to get their hands on that settlement check?

  • Mike Adams posted at 7:00 pm on Wed, Oct 5, 2011.

    Mike Adams Posts: 1574

    Well since mom is suing the school, she believes something happened. When I was in the classroom, I only occasionally emailed students, most of that was to the entire class. Occasionally someone would want to know a test score and I would email that student individually. I can't even begin to think why a male teacher would be sending repeated text messages to a student, a young girl at that.

    I made it a habit in my department that if I saw what might be questionable situations (not an actual act of some sort, for that must be reported immediately), like a male teacher and a female student alone in a room, door shut even between classes (and it goes goes ways male teacher-male student, female teacher-male student, female teacher-female student) I would give them this advice: If someone makes an allegation today, tomorrow, the end of the week, next year,....... Who do you think is going to lose? Who stands the chance of losing everything?
    Teachers constantly put themselves at risk, even I occasionally broke my own rules in regards to the door closed between passing periods, but mostly because I didn't get the door locked open right away. In cases like that, it's nice to have a history of someone who hasn't even gone close to the line rather than occasionally walking it.

  • Kim Lee posted at 8:52 pm on Mon, Oct 3, 2011.

    Kim Lee Posts: 1798

    Erika Cuevas: You have a lot to learn.

  • Kim Lee posted at 5:16 am on Mon, Oct 3, 2011.

    Kim Lee Posts: 1798

    The article states... "According to the complaint, the victim did not consent to the abuse, which was described as Hartsock putting his hands on and between the girl's legs multiple times."

    Of course the child did not give consent. A child cannot give legal consent for sexual contact. Also, an 11 year old student should not be receiving text messages from a teacher.

  • Erika Cuevas posted at 6:23 pm on Sun, Oct 2, 2011.

    Erika Cuevas Posts: 2

    I also attend Ben Holt and I agree with Monique. My sister and I have had art classes with Mr. Hartsock and we would eat our lunch in his classroom almost every day. We have never experienced any kind of lewd misconduct with him. Also, I think that the wording used by the writers seems to already be taking a certain position on the matter. Another thing is that the quote used, "I love you," can be taken out of context. For example, the girl could have been saying "no one loves me" or "no one cares about me." Honestly, how could a child be taken off campus several times without parental consent? They would have known one way or another. The audience reading this article has no background information on the individuals involved.

  • Monique Hasbun posted at 11:22 am on Sun, Oct 2, 2011.

    callmemoe Posts: 1

    So, I attend BHCPA, and you guys painted a totally horrible picture of Mr. Merrit. Most of the teachers put "Student was a pleasure to have in class" as their feedback... It is an option in the system and almost everyone chooses it.... this has no meaning what so ever and does not make Mr. Merrit involved at all.



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists