Dan Evans/News-Sentinel
Lodi’s new mayor: Bob Johnson
Newly appointed mayor Bob Johnson hands exiting Lodi City Council member Susan Hitchcock a green belt to commemorate her work on the greenbelt separating Lodi and Stockton during the council meeting on Wednesday, Dec. 1, 2010.
Dan Evans/News-Sentinel
Lodi’s new mayor: Bob Johnson
Lodi City Council members Phil Katzakian, left, Alan Nakanishi, center, and Larry Hansen are sworn in during the Lodi City Council meeting on Wednesday, Dec. 1, 2010.
Dan Evans/News-Sentinel
Lodi’s new mayor: Bob Johnson
Newly appointed Mayor Bob Johnson, left, and re-elected Councilman Phil Katzakian laugh after the Lodi City Council meeting was adjourned Wednesday, Dec. 1, 2010.
Posted: Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:00 am
|
Updated: 5:59 am, Fri Dec 3, 2010.
Lodi’s new mayor: Bob Johnson
By Ross Farrow
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Lodinews.com
|
Bob Johnson was unanimously elected mayor by his Lodi City
Council colleagues before a packed house at Carnegie Forum on
Wednesday night. Johnson, a councilman since 2004 who also served
for 10 months in 1998 to fill a council vacancy, assumed the role
of mayor for the second time. He previously held the top position
in 2007 and was a real estate appraiser in Lodi for 18 years.
The council was anything but unified when JoAnne Mounce was
elected mayor pro tem by only a 3-2 vote. Johnson and Councilman
Larry Hansen cast the dissenting votes. No one else was nominated
for mayor pro tem.
An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety.
You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.
Login
Or, use your
linked account:
Current print subscribers
Need an account? Create one now.
Or, use your
linked account:
kAmp7E6C E96 >66E:?8[ y@9?D@?[ w2?D6? 2?5 |@F?46 564=:?65 E@
5:D4FDD E96 DA=:E G@E6]k^Am
kAm“x G@E65 ?@[” w2?D6? D2:5] “%92E’D 2== x’> 8@:?8 E@ D2J]”k^Am
kAmy@9?D@? 25565[ “x’5 C2E96C ?@E 2:C 5:CEJ =2F?5CJ :? AF3=:4]”k^Am
kAmx? 255:E:@? E@ G@E:?8 @? H9@ H:== =625 E96 4@F?4:=[ w2?D6?[
@FE8@:?8 |2J@C !9:= z2EK2<:2? 2?5 p=2? }2<2?:D9: H6C6 DH@C? :?E@
@77:46] w2?D6? 2?5 z2EK2<:2? H6C6 C6\6=64E65 :? E96 }@G] a
6=64E:@?[ H9:=6 }2<2?:D9: C6EFC?65 E@ E96 4@F?4:= 27E6C D:I J62CD
:? E96 DE2E6 pDD6>3=J]k^Am
kAmx? 9:D @A6?:?8 C6>2C<D 27E6C E2<:?8 E96 >2J@C’D 82G6=[ y@9?D@?
=:DE65 9:D E@A AC:@C:E:6D 7@C 9:D @?6\J62C E6C> 2D >2J@Cik^Am
kF=m
k=:mp “G6CJ D6C:@FD 5:D4FDD:@?” @? 9@H E96 4:EJ D9@F=5 92?5=6
A6?D:@? :DDF6D] xE :D?’E H@C<:?8 E96 H2J :E :D[ 96 D2:5]k^=:m
k=:m(@C< 5:=:86?E=J E@ 2EEC24E ;@3\4C62E:?8 3FD:?6DD6D E@ {@5:]
%92E :?4=F56D 4@?D:56C:?8 7:?2?4:2= :?46?E:G6D E@ 2EEC24E
3FD:?6DD6D]k^=:m
k=:ms:D4FDD H96E96C E96 4:EJ D9@F=5 :?G6DE :? 9:C:?8 2? 64@?@>:4
56G6=@A>6?E 5:C64E@C] y@9?D@? 25>:EE65 96 5@6D?’E <?@H H96E96C {@5:
?665D @?6 @C ?@E[ 3FE E96C6 D9@F=5 36 2 D6C:@FD 5:D4FDD:@?]k^=:m
k=:m%2<6 42C6 @7 6I:DE:?8 3FD:?6DD6D 2?5 6?4@FC28:?8 E96> E@ C6>2:?
:? {@5:]k^=:m
k=:mr@?D:56C:?8 @?6 @C EH@ E@H? 92== >66E:?8D E@ D:>A=J =:DE6? E@
H92E6G6C 4@?46C?D C6D:56?ED 92G6] y@9?D@? DF886DE65 @?6 >66E:?8 @?
E96 t2DED:56 2?5 @?6 @? E96 H6DE D:56 @7 E@H?]k^=:m
k^F=m
kAmr:EJ |2?286C #25 q2CE=2> 2=D@ AC6D6?E65 A=2BF6D @7 2AAC64:2E:@?
E@ z2EK2<:2? 7@C D6CG:?8 2D >2J@C :? a__h 2?5 E@ $FD2? w:E494@4<[
H9@ 49@D6 E@ C6E:C6 7C@> E96 4@F?4:= 27E6C `a J62CD] $96 2=D@
D6CG65 `b J62CD @? E96 !=2??:?8 r@>>:DD:@?]k^Am
kAmz2EK2<:2? D2:5 96 H2D?’E DFC6 2 J62C 28@ H96E96C 96 H2D C625J E@
D6CG6 2D >2J@C 3642FD6 E96C6 H2D 2 DE66A =62C?:?8 4FCG6[ 3FE ?@H 96
D2JD 96 H2D 8=25 96 5:5]k^Am
kAmp4<?@H=658:?8 E92E 96 ?66565 2 =@E @7 96=A H:E9 >2J@C2= 5FE:6D
2E E96 368:??:?8 @7 9:D E6C> 2 J62C 28@[ z2EK2<:2? D2:5 96 C646:G65
E92E 96=A 7C@> q2CE=2>[ 7@C>6C r:EJ |2?286C q=2:C z:?8 2?5 r:EJ
r=6C< #2?5: y@9=[ 2=@?8 H:E9 @E96C r:EJ r@F?4:= 2?5 DE277
>6>36CD]k^Am
kAmw:E494@4< ?@E65 E92E {@5:’D A@AF=2E:@? H2D be[hag H96? D96
;@:?65 E96 !=2??:?8 r@>>:DD:@? :? `hga 2?5 D2H E96 4:EJ 8C@H E@
eb[dch E@52J] $96 D6CG65 H:E9 7:G6 4:EJ >2?286CD 2?5 `` @E96C
4@F?4:= >6>36CD]k^Am
kAmw:E494@4<[ H9@ 6?5FC65 D6G6C2= 4@?E6?E:@FD 5632E6D H:E9 96C
4@F?4:= 4@==628F6D 5FC:?8 96C E9C66 E6C>D[ D2:5 D96 36=:6G6D :?
7F== 5:D4=@DFC6[ EC2?DA2C6?4J 2?5 @A6? 5632E6]k^Am
kAm“x 36=:6G6 5632E6 :D E96 7@F?52E:@? 7@C 56>@4C24J[” D96
D2:5]k^Am
kAm$96 FC865 E96 4@F?4:= E@ 4@?E:?F6 H@C<:?8 E@H2C5 2 “4@>>F?:EJ
D6A2C2E@C[” @C 8C66?36=E[ E@ D6A2C2E6 {@5: 7C@> $E@4<E@?]k^Am
kAm“%92?< J@F 7@C 2==@H:?8 >6 E@ D6CG6[” D96 4@?4=F565]k^Am
kAmw6C 9FD32?5[ y6CCJ v=6??[ H2D :? E62CD H96? 96 255C6DD65 E96
4@F?4:= 23@FE w:E494@4<] w6 ?@E65 E92E D96 :D 2 EC66\9F886C[ 4C:65
H96? E96?\r@F?4:=>2? z6:E9 {2?5 EC:65 E@ 86E w:E494@4< 46?DFC65 :?
a__b 7@C 5:D4=@D:?8 :?7@C>2E:@? 23@FE 2 G@E6 E2<6? :? 4=@D65
D6DD:@? C682C5:?8 8C@F?5H2E6C 4@?E2>:?2E:@? 2?5 4C:?865 H96? E96
4@F?4:= G@E65 282:?DE w:E494@4< @? :DDF6D E92E H6C6 :>A@CE2?E E@
96C]k^Am
kAm{2E6C :? E96 >66E:?8[ w2?D6? 4C65:E65 w:E494@4< 7@C D2G:?8 E96
4:EJ >:==:@?D @7 5@==2CD 3J 2D<:?8 92C5 BF6DE:@?D 23@FE E96
8C@F?5H2E6C 4@?E2>:?2E:@? :DDF6 2?5 A6CDF25:?8 E96 4@F?4:= E@
C6G6CD6 :ED 5:C64E:@? @? E96 4@?EC@G6CD:2= 42D6]k^Am
kAmv=6?? E96? 2??@F?465 E92E 7C@> ?@H @?[ E96 7:CDE 2?5 E9:C5
(65?6D52J @7 6249 >@?E9[ H96? 4@F?4:= >66E:?8D 2C6 96=5[ H:==
364@>6 E96:C “52E6 ?:89E]” w6 E@=5 w:E494@4< 7C@> E96 A@5:F> E92E
96 2=C625J 92D A=2?D 7@C 96C @? s64] `d]k^Am
kAmk6>mr@?E24E C6A@CE6C #@DD u2CC@H 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@iC@DD7o=@5:?6HD]4@>QmC@DD7o=@5:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^6>mk^Am
Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761.
You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.
Login
Or, use your
linked account:
Current print subscribers
Need an account? Create one now.
Posted in
News
on
Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:00 am.
Updated: 5:59 am.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days. You will see 10 articles for free before being asked to register, and then you can view 10 additional articles by registering or logging in. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) total free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You have viewed (%viewed%) of your 20 free pages in 30 days. Please login or register at this time and enjoy the next (%remaining%) articles free of charge. After your 20 free articles, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. Because you have already viewed this article, you may view it again as many times as you would like without subtracting from your remaining free article views.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for registering on Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days. This is your last free article this period. On your next article we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761.
darlene casella posted at 3:04 pm on Thu, Jan 20, 2011.
Bob Johnson, Mayor of Lodi!!! John Simon found you. He even found Janet. For years when we got together our first questions would be "Where is Janet?" Soon followed by has anyone heard from Bob Johnson?
Now it seems you have been prospering in Lodi hence these many years. Frank and I live in Southern California. John and Barbara in South Carolina.
Congratulations on your most recent political success.
Darlene
Bob Johnson posted at 2:35 pm on Fri, Dec 3, 2010.
Mr. Cheney:
Do youself a favor and check out my financial filings as required by the state and please explain to me where my "wealth levels" have "vastly increased" in the past several years.
roy bitz posted at 9:30 am on Fri, Dec 3, 2010.
There are no consequences for our three gentle councilmen when the mislead us with half truths in order to justify their pet projects. Consequences fall to rate payers.
The "treat and drink" water treatment plant and the twenty year Waste Management contract are two examples of how misleading information was used to justify their approval of very costly pet projects.
1.No competitive bid was considered for the twenty year WM contract---it was awarded on the condition WM "donate" one million dollars to pay for grape bowl upgrades. This was not a donation and it was not a good deal for rate payers.
2.The ground water over draft is 200,000 afa. The"treat and drink" water plant will treat 6,000 afa. It will not help resolve the over draft problem but rate payers have been lead to believe it will provide better quality drinking water and it is needed due to ground water over draft. Neither statement is true. The 6,000 afa of river water will be mixed with about 12,000 afa of ground water we use. The quality of the treated water may be better when it leaves the plant but not when it is used.
Josh Morgan posted at 7:03 am on Fri, Dec 3, 2010.
Roy, don't you think they are accountable every time they run for election? And believe me, I don't vote for many of the winners in this State.
Doug Chaney posted at 6:57 am on Fri, Dec 3, 2010.
Josh Morgan, listen up young pup. You could possibly learn something other than what the city spinners and their hush hush News-Sentinel spoon feed you. Are you reated to Haansen, Jonson, Katzakian, Hood, Bartlam or Sandelin? Just curious. .
roy bitz posted at 10:39 pm on Thu, Dec 2, 2010.
Our council members are "elected volunteers". These volunteers are not accountable--but they have the freedom to spend our tax dollars and our "rate payer dollars" pretty much as they choose.
For example, three gentle councilmen have committed rate payers to long term contracts to fund the "treat and drink" water treatment plant. This plant, the cost of operating it ,and the cost of the river water will cost rate payers over one hundred fifty million dollars over the next forty years. This is one example as to how much power---just three gentle councilmen have. They approved a multi-million dollar multi year contract for a project we do not need.
We were told we need this plant because our ground water is being over drafted by 200,000 afa. The plant will treat 6,000 afa. This is 3% of the over draft. Do the math.
Josh Morgan posted at 9:18 pm on Thu, Dec 2, 2010.
Doug, when are you going to come up with some new material? I know you believe that if you yell long and loud enough that someone is going to believe you. Unfortunately that hasn't happened over the past several years.
Doug Chaney posted at 8:23 pm on Thu, Dec 2, 2010.
Mr. know it all mayor Johnson, I'm surprised you didn't get your last licks of intimidation and smart alec remarkstoward Ms. Hitchcock that you've consistently made during nearly every council meeting open to the public and televised. Are you still a part time retired real estate appraiser? With those highball appraisals that helped tumble the RE industry here in this area? Nice to have a transplanted New Yorker mayor, I believe, and outgoing mayor Katzakian with a family deeply embroiled in real estate sales, brokerage building and development, city manager Bartlam being a get rich quick wannabe real estate broker and developer, I suspect your first item on the business front will be to pass redevelopment for your other RE business associates, friends and family to again line your pockets with those free government dollars for those same interests and burden Lodi with another $250 million plus debt to line your own pockets. This council, sadly, looks like just another batch of Lodi good old boys, and I do mean old. Just the 4 amigos will cost the taxpayers plenty in mediical plans and payments. I hope you three old, clueless fools will heed the words of the Honorable Alan Nakanishi and ex-mayor JoAnne Mounce and work for us taxpayers of Lodi and not the developers and RE industry, as your voting records from the past 4 years indicate. Haven't your wealth levels vastly increased in the last 4 years, 3 amigos? 3 amigos, please respond on these public blogs so Lodians can have statements from you besides the spin and BS and your city communications manager feed us?